Skip to main content
Log in

Placement as part of higher education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many students in Britain, especially those training for the professions, do parts of their courses in the form of placements in the field. Most such placements are compulsory. During placements students are the joint concern of their tutors on the campus and their mentors in the field. The placements on the different courses seem dramatically different. For example, some placements are in primary schools, some in hospital wards, some in factory pharmacies and some in electrical power stations. This study shows, however, that despite such obvious differences in the placement settings, student feelings about placement can be remarkably similar. For staff whose courses include placement there are issues which they could usefully discuss in common.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Department of Education and Science - DES (1984), Initial Teacher Training: Approval of Courses, Circular 3/84 (London: DES).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Department of Industry - DoI (1986), Engineering Our Future (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Editorial of Pharmaceutical Journal, 19 September 1987, pp. 343–344.

  4. United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting - UKCC (1986), Project 2000 “A new preparation for practice” (London: UKCC).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Napier Polytechnic Students' Association (1988), Placement Students 1987–1988, (Napier Polytechnic, Edinburgh, mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoste, R. (1977a), Semantic Differential Course Appraisal Scales, Colleges Curriculum Project (University of Leeds and N.F.E.R. mimeo).

  7. Hoste, R. (1977b), ‘Evaluating an In-service Course in Reading’, Brit. J. In-service Education4, pp. 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cameron-Jones, M. (1980), ‘Follow-up Note: The Usefulness of Hoste's Course Appraisal Scales’, Brit. J. In-service Education7, pp. 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoste, R. (1981), ‘Course Appraisal Using Semantic Differential Scales’, Education Studies7.3, pp. 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jarvis, P. and Gibson, S. (1985), The Teacher Practitioner in Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (London: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bennett, N. et al. (1984), ‘The Quality of Pupil Learning Experiences’ (London: Lawrence Erlbaum).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benne, K. D. (1976), ‘Educational Field Experiences as the negotiation of different cognitive worlds’ in Bennis, W. et al. (eds.), The Planning of Change (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kilbourn, B. (1986), ‘Situational Analysis of Teaching in Clinical Supervision’ in Smyth, W. J. (ed.), Learning about Teaching through Clinical Supervision (London: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cameron-Jones, M., O'Hara, P. Placement as part of higher education. High Educ 19, 341–349 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133897

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133897

Keywords

Navigation