Abstract
While Nominal Clauses in Japanese are similar to English nominalization in their argument-taking ability, they are unlike English in that they behave just like verbal clauses in the distribution of verbal Cases on the noun's arguments. In investigating the Nominal Clauses with deverbal nouns serving as their predicates, this paper will demonstrate that a set of licensing conditions must be imposed on the deverbal nouns: they need to satisfy categorial, argument-structural, and semantic requirements. I will propose, however, that these conditions are necessary but not sufficient in licensing a well-formed Nominal Clause, and that a further restriction must be added on the basis of prosodic evidence: I will claim that the deverbal noun must consist of at least four morae. This prosodic constraint provides further support for Poser's (1990) contention regarding the role of the bimoraic foot in Japanese.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dowty, David: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Grimshaw, Jane: 1988, ‘Adjuncts and Argument Structure’, Lexicon Project Working Papers 21, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Grimshaw, Jane: 1990, Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Grimshaw, Jane and Armin Mester: 1988, ‘Light Verbs and θ-Marking’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 205–232.
Halle, Morris and J.-R. Vergnaud: 1987, An Essay on Stress, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Hammond, Michael: 1987, ‘Hungarian Cola’, Phonology Yearbook 4, 267–269.
Iida, Masayo: 1987, ‘Case-Assignment by Nominals in Japanese’, in M. Iida, S. Wechsler and D. Zec (eds.), Working Papers in Grammatical Theory and Discourse Structure, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, pp. 93–138.
Ito, Junko: 1990, ‘Minimality and Directionality’, paper presented at CLS 26.
Ito, Junko and Armin Mester: 1986, ‘The Phonology of Voicing in Japanese’, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 49–73.
Kageyama, Taro: 1977, ‘Incorporation and Sino-Japanese Verbs’, Papers in Japanese Linguistics 5, 117–156.
Kageyama, Taro: 1982, ‘Word Formation in Japanese’, Lingua 67, 215–258.
Kawakami, S.: 1973, ‘Doosi kara no tensei meisi no akusento, (Accentuation of deverbal nouns)’, in Imaizumi Hakase Koki Kinen Kokugogaku Ronsoo, pp. 50–70.
Lasnik, Howard: 1988, ‘Subjects and the θ-Criterion’, NLLT 6, 1–17.
McCawley, James: 1968, The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese, Mouton, The Hague.
Martin. Samuel: 1975. A Reference Grammar of Japanese, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Miyagawa, Shigeru: 1986, ‘Restructuring in Japanese’, in T. Imai and M. Saito (eds.), Issues in Japanese Linguistics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 273–300.
Mester, Armin and Junko Ito: 1989, ‘Feature Predictability and Underspecification: Palatal Prosody in Japanese Mimetics’, Language 65, 258–293.
Miyagawa, Shigeru: 1989, ‘Light Verbs and the Ergative Hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 659–668.
Miyagawa, Shigeru: 1990, ‘Functional Categories and Case Assignment’, unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University.
Mohanan, Tara: 1989, ‘Syllable Structure in Malayalam’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 589–625.
Nakayama, Mineharu and Wako Tawa: 1989, ‘Implicit Arguments and Subjects of Rationale Clauses in Japanese Passives’, unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University and Amherst College.
Nespor, Marina and Irene Vogel: 1986, Prosodic Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht.
Otsu, Yukio: 1980, ‘Some Aspects of Rendaku in Japanese and Related Problems’, in Y. Otsu and A. Farmer (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 207–227.
Poser, William: 1984, ‘The Phonetics and Phonology of Tone and Intonation in Japanese’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Poser, William: 1990, ‘Evidence for Foot Structure in Japanese’, Language 66, 78–105.
Poser, William: in press, ‘Blocking of Phrasal Constructions by Lexical Items’, in I. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Rappaport, Malka: 1983, ‘On the Nature of Derived Nominals’, in L. Levin, M. Rappaport and A. Zaenen (eds.), Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, pp. 113–142.
Rappaport, Malka and Beth Levin: 1989, ‘Is There Evidence for Deep Unaccusativity in English? An Analysis of Resultative Construction’, unpublished manuscript, Bar Ilan University and Northwestern University.
Saiki, Mariko: 1987, ‘Grammatical Functions in the Syntax of Japanese Nominals’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Sells, Peter: 1990, ‘More on Light Verbs and Theta-Marking’, unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Shibatani, Masayoshi and Taro Kageyama: 1988, ‘Word Formation in a Modular Theory of Grammar’, Language 64, 451–484.
Simpson, Jane: 1983, ‘Resultatives’, in L. Levin, M. Rappaport and A. Zaenen (eds.), Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, pp. 143–157.
Stowell, Timothy: 1979, ‘Stress Systems of the World, Unite!’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics I, 51–76.
Sugioka, Yoko: 1986, Interaction of Derivational Morphology and Syntax in Japanese and English, Garland, New York.
Tateishi, Koichi: 1989, ‘Theoretical Implications of Japanese Musicians' Language’, WCCFL 8, 384–398.
Tenny, Carol: 1987, Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Tsujimura, Natsuko: 1989, ‘Some Accentuation Properties in Japanese and Lexical Phonology’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 334–338.
Tsujimura, Natsuko: 1990a, ‘Ergativity of Nouns and Case Assignment’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 277–287.
Tsujimura, Natsuko: 1990b, ‘Unaccusative Hypothesis and Noun Classification’, Linguistics 28, 929–957.
Vendler, Zeno: 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Williams, Edwin: 1985, ‘PRO and Subject of NP’, NLLT 3, 297–315.
Zec, Draga and Sharon Inkelas: 1990, ‘Prosodically Constrained Syntax’, in S. Inkelas and D. Zec (eds.), The Phonology Syntax Connection, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 365–378.
Zubizaretta, Maria Luisa: 1987, Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank Clancy Clements, Stuart Davis, Masayo Iida, Beth Levin, Shigeru Miyagawa, Mineharu Nakayama, Ljiljana Progovac, and Yoshiko Uchida for their comments on earlier versions of this paper. The current version benefited greatly from the insightful comments and challenging questions of three anonymous NLLT reviewers. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at Indiana University, University of Rochester, and the 1991 annual meeting of the LSA in Chicago, and I am indebted to the people in attendance for their comments and discussions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsujimura, N. Licensing nominal clauses: The case of deverbal nominals in Japanese. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 10, 477–522 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133371
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133371