Skip to main content
Log in

Chinese is a VO language

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigating some word order phenomena in Chinese, we will arrive at the conclusion that Chinese has to be characterised as a VO language. The evidence is drawn mainly from the behaviour of locative PPs. Making extensive comparisons with the behaviour of locative PPs in Dutch, we show that in Chinese, all locative adjunct PPs appear on the left-hand side of the verb, whereas predicative complements follow the verb. Contrary to the communis opinio, we claim that this generalization holds unconditionally.

We briefly touch upon some consequences of this result for the theory of directionality. One of these consequences is that the OV/VO distinction can and should be cast in terms of a Theta Directionality parameter. Other parameters that have been proposed in the literature, especially Headedness, are irrelevant to accounting for the Chinese word-order facts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abney, S. P.: 1986, The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beukema, F. and T. Hoekstra: 1984, ‘Extractions from with-Constructions’, Linguistic Inquiry 15, 689–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouman, J.: 1989, Deverbale Nomina, Light Verbs en Denominale Verba, MA Thesis, University of Leiden.

  • Chao, Y. R.: 1968, A Grammar of Spoken Chinese, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culicover, P. W. and M. S. Rochemont: 1990, ‘Extraposition and the Complement Principle’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D.: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J. and A. Mester: 1988, ‘Light Verbs and Theta Marking’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 205–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, T.: 1984, Transitivity, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, T.: 1988, ‘Small Clause Results’, Lingua 74, 101–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, T., M. Lansu and M. Westerduin: 1988, ‘Complexe Verba’, Glot 10, 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, T. and R. Mulder: 1990, ‘Unergatives as Copular Verbs: Locational and Existential Predication’, The Linguistic Review 7, 1–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M.: 1990, Movement, Traces and Incorporation in the Lexicon, Paper read at the Second Leiden Conference for Junior Linguists.

  • Huang, J. C. T.: 1982, Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. C. T.: 1987, ‘Existential Sentences in Chinese and (In)definiteness’, in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 226–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. S.: 1974, ‘A Deep Structure Projection Rule’, Linquistic Inquiry 5, 481–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1984, Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1985, Principles of Particle Constructions, in J. Guéron, H.-G. Obenauer and J.-Y. Pollock (eds.), Grammatical Representation, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H.: 1984, The Syntax of Verbs, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, J.: 1975, ‘Dutch as an SOV Language’, Linguistic Analysis 1, 111–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, S.-Y.: 1988, ‘Whether We Agree or Not’, Linguisticae Investigationes 12, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.-H. Audrey: 1985, Abstract Case in Chinese, Ph.D. dissertation, USC.

  • Li, Y.-H. Audrey: 1990, Order and Constiuency in Mandarin Chinese, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. and S. Thompson: 1974, ‘An Explanation of Word Order Change SVO → SOV’, Foundations of Language 12, 201–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. and S. Thompson: 1975, ‘The Semantic Function of Word Order: A Case Study in Mandarin’, in C. Li (ed.), Word Order and Word Order Change, University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 165–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. and S. Thompson: 1981, Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, T.: 1979, ‘Word Order and Word Order Change in Mandarin Chinese’, Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7, 149–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Xiwen: 1987, ‘Yu Dongjieshi Dongci Youguan de Mouxie Jushi’, Zhongguo Yuwen 1987, 424–41.

  • Mei, K.: 1980, ‘Is Modern Chinese Really an SOV Language?’, Cah. de Ling. Asie Orientale 7, 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro, A.: 1990, ‘There-raising: Principles Across Levels’, Paper read at GLOW 1990, Cambridge, UK.

  • Mulder R. and P. Wehrmann: 1989, ‘Locational Verbs as Unaccusatives’, Linguistics in the Netherlands 1989, pp. 111–22.

  • Mullie, J.: 1932, The Structural Principles of the Chinese Language, Vol. 1, The Bureau of Engraving and Printing, Peking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemsdijk, H. van: 1978, A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness: The Binding Nature of Prepositional Phrases, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J.: 1983, ‘Resultatives’, in B. Levin, M. Rappaport and A. Zaenen (eds.), Papers in Lexical Functional Grammar, reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T.: 1981, Origins of Phrase Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Tai, J. H. Y.: 1973, ‘Chinese as a SOV Language’, in C. Corum et al. (eds.), Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 659–71.

  • Tai, J. H. Y.: 1976, ‘On the Change from SVO to SOV in Chinese’, in S.B. Steever et al. (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, CLS, pp. 291–304.

  • Travis, L.: 1984, Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Zhou, X. P.: 1989, ‘Is Chinese a Head-Final Language?’, in M. K. M. Chan and T. Ernst (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Ohio State University Conference on Chinese Linguistics 1988, reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulder, R., Sybesma, R. Chinese is a VO language. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 10, 439–476 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133370

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133370

Keywords

Navigation