Abstract
A comparison of Hong Kong and United States rate-of-return regulation indicates differences in the definition of the rate base and in the proportion of it permitted a fair rate of return. These differences imply that Hong Kong electric utilities utilize proportionately more fixed (less current) assets, and that these assets are financed proportionately more by equity (less by debt), than their United States counterparts. Our results support both these predictions, providing further evidence that since rate-ofreturn regulation is implemented by reference to “reported” results, comparatively minor differences in regulatory frameworks can have quite dramatic consequences for utilities' asset structure and financing mix.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Averch, H., and L.L. Johnson. 1962. “Behavior of the firm under regulatory constraint.” American Economic Review 52 (December): 1053–1069.
Berg, S.V., and J. Tschirhart. 1988. Natural Monopoly Regulation: Principles and Practice. Cambridge University Press: London.
Cameron, N. 1982. Power: The Story of China Light. Oxford University Press: London.
Coates, A. 1977. A Mountain of Light: The Story of Hong Kong Electric Co. Heinemann: London.
Fisher, F.M., P.S. Fox-Penner, J.E. Greenwood, W.G. Moss, and A. Phillips 1992. “Due diligence and the demand for electricity: A cautionary tale.” Review of Industrial Organization 7(2): 117–149.
Hogg, R.V., and A.T. Craig 1988. Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. Macmillan: New York.
Jarrell, G.A. 1979. “Pro-producer regulation and accounting for assets: The case of electric utilities.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 1 (August): 93–116.
Modigliani, F., and M. Miller. 1958. “The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment.” American Economic Review 48 (June): 261–297.
Myers, S.C. 1977. “Determinants of corporate borrowing.” Journal of Financial Economics 5 (November): 147–175.
Myers, S.C., and N.S. Majluf. 1984. “Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have.” Journal of Financial Economics 13(June): 187–221.
Sherman, R. 1989. The Regulation of Monopoly. Cambridge University Press: London.
Stein, J.L., and G.H. Borts 1972. “Behavior of the firm under regulatory constraint.” American Economic Review 62 (December): 964–970.
The Scheme of Control Agreement entered into by the Hong Kong Government and The Hong Kong Electric Company Limited and Hongkong Electric Holdings Limited (15 July 1993).
The Scheme of Control Agreement entered into by the Hong Kong Government and China Light and Power Company Ltd, Exxon Energy Ltd, Peninsula Electric Power Company Ltd, Kowloon Electricity Supply Company Ltd and Castle Peak Power Company Ltd (9 March 1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peles, Y.C., Whittred, G. Incentive effects of rate-of-return regulation: The case of Hong Kong electric utilities. J Regul Econ 10, 99–112 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133360
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133360