Landscape Ecology

, Volume 4, Issue 2–3, pp 133–155

Influence of landscape structure on local and regional climate

  • R. A. Pielke
  • R. Avissar


This paper discusses the physical linkage between the surface and the atmosphere, and demonstrates how even slight changes in surface conditions can have a pronounced effect on weather and climate. Observational and modeling evidence are presented to demonstrate the influence of landscape type on the overlying atmospheric conditions. The albedo, and the fractional partitioning of atmospheric turbulent heat flux into sensible and latent fluxes is shown to be particularly important in directly affecting local and regional weather and climate. It is concluded that adequate assessment of global climate and climate change cannot be achieved unless mesoscale landscape characteristics and their changes over time can be accurately determined.


land use climate climate change land use alteration landscape patterns weather 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anthes, R.A. 1984. Enhancement of convective precipitation by mesoscale variations in vegetative covering in semiarid regions. J. Climate Appl. Meteor. 23: 541–554.Google Scholar
  2. Avissar, R. and Mahrer, Y. 1988a. Mapping frost-sensitive areas with a three-dimensional local scale numerical model. Part I: Physical and numerical aspects. J. Appl. Meteor. 27: 400–413.Google Scholar
  3. Avissar, R. and Mahrer, Y. 1988b. Mapping frost-sensitive areas with a three-dimensional local scale numerical model. Part II: Comparison with observations. J. Appl. Meteor. 27: 414–420.Google Scholar
  4. Avissar, R. and Pielke, R.A. 1989. A parameterization of heterogeneous land surfaces for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology. Mon. Wea. Rev. 117: 2113–2136.Google Scholar
  5. Carson, D.J. and Sangster, A.B. 1981. The influence of landsurface albedo and soil moisture on general circulation model simulations. GARP/WCRP: Research Activities in Atmospheric and Oceanic Modeling. (Ed. I.D. Rutherford). Numerical Experimentation Programme, Report No. 2, 5.14–5.21.Google Scholar
  6. Charney, J.G., Quirk, W.J., Chow, S.H. and Kornfield, J. 1977. A comparative study of the effects of albedo change on drought in semi-arid regions. J. Atmos. Sci. 34: 1366–1385.Google Scholar
  7. Chervin, R.M. 1979. Response of the NCAR general circulation model to changed land surface albedo. Report of the JOC Study Conference on Climate Models: Performance, Intercomparison, and Sensitivity Studies, Washington.D.C. 3–7 April, 1978. GARP Publ. Series, No. 22, Vol. 1, pp. 563–581.Google Scholar
  8. Cramer, Capt. James, 1988, M.S. Thesis: Observational Evaluation of Snow Cover on the Generation and Modification of Mesoscale Circulations. Colorado State University, 144 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Dalu, G.A., Pielke, R.A., Avissar, R., Kallos, G. and Guerrini, A. 1990. Impact of terrain thermal inhomogeneities on mesoscale atmospheric flow: Theory of the subgrid-scale parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci, (submitted).Google Scholar
  10. Dickinson, R.E. and Henderson-Sellers, A. 1988. Modelling tropical deforestation: A study of GCM land-surface parameterizations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 114: 439–462.Google Scholar
  11. Garrett, A.J. 1982. A parameter study of interactions between convective clouds, the convective boundary-layer, and forested surface. Mon. Wea. Rev. 110: 1041–1059.Google Scholar
  12. Henderson-Sellers, A. 1980. Albedo changes Surface surveillance from satellites. Climatic Change. 2: 275–281.Google Scholar
  13. Henderson-Sellers, A. and Gornitz, V. 1984. Possible climatic impacts of land cover transformations with particular emphasis on tropical deforestation. Climatic Change. 6: 231–257.Google Scholar
  14. Henderson-Sellers, A., Dickinson, R.E. and Wilson, M.F. 1988. Tropical deforestation: Important processes for climate models. Climatic Change. 13: 43–67.Google Scholar
  15. Kurbatkin, G.P., Manabe, S. and Hahn, D.G. 1979. The moisture content of the continents and the intensity of summer monsoon circulation. Met. Gid. 1–6.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, R. 1978. Forest micrometeorology Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Lovelock, J.E. 1986. Geophysiology: A new look at earth science. Bull. Amer. Met. Soc. 67: 392–397.Google Scholar
  18. Mahfouf, J.F., Richard, E. and Mascart, P. 1987. The influence of soil and vegetation on the development of mesoscale circulation. J. Climate Appl. Meteor. 26: 1483–1495.Google Scholar
  19. Manabe, S. 1975. A study of the interaction between the hydrological cycle and climate using a mathematical model of the atmosphere. Proc. Conf. on Weather and Food, Endicott House, Mass. Inst. Tech., Cambridge, Mass., 9–11 May 1975, 10 pp.Google Scholar
  20. McCumber, M.C. 1980. A numerical simulation of the influence of heat and moisture fluxes upon mesoscale circulations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia. 255 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Mintz, Y. 1984. The sensitivity of numerically simulated climates to land-surface conditions. The Global Climate, J. Houghton, Ed., Cambridge University Press, 79–105.Google Scholar
  22. Miyakoda, K. and Strickler, R.F. 1981. Cumulative results of extended forecast experiment. Part III: Precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev. 109: 830–842.Google Scholar
  23. Oke, T.R. 1978. Boundary layer climates. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  24. Pielke, R.A. 1984. Mesoscale meteorological modeling. Academic Press, New York, N.Y. 612 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Pielke, R.A. and Zeng, X. 1989. Influence on severe storm development of irrigated land. Nat. Wea. Dig. 14: 16–17.Google Scholar
  26. Rosenberg, N. 1974. Microclimate: The biological environment. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Rowntree, P.R. and Bolton, J.A. 1978. Experiments with soil moisture anomalies over Europe. The GARP Programme on Numerical Experimentation: Research Activities in Atmospheric and Oceanic Modeling (Ed. R. Asselin). Report No. 18. WMO/ICSU, Geneva, August 1978, p. 63.Google Scholar
  28. Segal, M., McNider, R.T., Pielke, R.A. and McDougal, D.S. 1982. A numerical model simulation of the regional air pollution meteorology of the greater Chesapeake Bay area summer day case study. Atmos. Environ. 16: 1381–1397.Google Scholar
  29. Segal, M., Avissar, R., McCumber, M.C. and Pielke, R.A. 1988. Evaluation of vegetation effects on the generation and modification of mesoscale circulations. J. Atmos. Sci. 45: 2268–2292.Google Scholar
  30. Segal, M., Schreiber, W., Kallos, G., Pielke, R.A., Garratt, J.R., Weaver, J., Rodi, A. and Wilson, J. 1989. The impact of crop areas in northeast Colorado on midsummer mesoscale thermal circulations. Mon. Wea. Rev. 117: 809–825.Google Scholar
  31. Shukla, J. and Mintz, Y. 1982. Influence of land-surface evapotranspiration on the Earth's climate. Science. 215: 1498–1501.Google Scholar
  32. Sud, Y.C. and Smith, W.E. 1985a. The influence of surface roughness of deserts on July circulation a numerical study. Bound.-Layer Meteor. 33: 1–35.Google Scholar
  33. Sud, Y.C. and Smith, W.E. 1985b. Influence of local land surface processes on the Indian Monsoon: A numerical study. J. Climate Appl. Meteor. 24: 1015–1036.Google Scholar
  34. Sud, Y.C., Shukla, J. and Mintz, Y. 1988. Influence of land surface roughness on atmospheric circulation and precipitation. A sensitivity study with a general circulation model. J. Appl. Meteor. 27: 1036–1054.Google Scholar
  35. Walker, J. and Rowntree, P.R. 1977. The effect of soil moisture on circulation and rainfall in a tropical model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 103: 29–46.Google Scholar
  36. Watson, A.J. and Lovelock, J.E. 1983. Biological homeostasis of the global environment: The parable of daisyworld. Tellus. 35B: 284–289.Google Scholar
  37. Whittaker, R.H. and Niering, W.A. 1965. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: A gradient analysis of the south slope. Ecology. 46: 429–452.Google Scholar
  38. Yamada, T. 1982. A numerical model simulation of turbulent airflow in and above canopy. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan. 60: 439–454.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SPB Academic Publishing bv 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Pielke
    • 1
  • R. Avissar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric ScienceColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Department of Meteorology and Physical OceanographyRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations