Skip to main content
Log in

A note on the relationship of interdependent action to the optimality of certain voting decisions

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the theory of public goods points to socially suboptimal contributions by agents acting under Cournot assumptions, this externality can be rectified by the introduction of positive interdependence of actions to the individual's choice calculus. This paper draws attention to the fact that the institution of democratic voting is itself a means of transforming the individual calculus in such a way that parameter changes are evaluated as simultaneous adjustments by the group, on the side of benefits, but by the individual only, on the side of costs, thus generating optimal parameter preference in the case of identical agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chamberlin, John: 1974, ‘Provision of collective Goods as a Function of Group Size’, American Political Science Review 68, 707–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. and Laffont, J. -J.: 1977, ‘Characterization of Satisfactory Mechanisms for the Revalation of Preferences for Public Goods’, Econometrica 45, 427–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, T. and Ledyard, J.: 1977, ‘Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the “Free Rider” Problem’, Econometrica 45, 783–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, Joel M.: 1978, ‘Understanding Collective Action: Matching Behavior’, American Economic Review 68, 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Ethics, Translated by T. K. Abbott, 3rd Edition, Longmans, London.

  • Kramer, G. H.: 1973, ‘On a Class of Equilibrium Conditions for Majority Rule’, Econometrica 41, 285–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur: 1965, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C. R.: 1967, ‘A Notion of Equilibrium and its Possibility Under Majority Rule’, American Economic Review 57, 787–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul: 1954, ‘The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure’, Review of Economics and Statistics 36, 387–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K.: 1969, ‘A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Theories of Collectivism in Allocation’, pp. 1–77 in T. Majumdar (ed.), Growth and Choice, Oxford University Press, Calcutta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K.: 1973, ‘Behavior and the Concept of Preference’, Economica 40, 241–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K.: 1974, ‘Choice, Orderings and Morality’, in Stephen Körner, (ed.), Practical Reason, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Putterman, L. A note on the relationship of interdependent action to the optimality of certain voting decisions. Theor Decis 17, 257–265 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132610

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132610

Keywords

Navigation