Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide an estimate of the elasticity and cros-selasticities of demand for higher education facing an individual institution. The utility which a high school graduate derives from each educational option open to him is assumed to be a stochastic function of the attributes of that option. For certain types of utility functions the maximization of utility results in the logit probability model. This model is used to analyze the choices made by a sample of high school graduates in Hawaii. Estimates of the price elasticity and the cross-price elasticities of demand for enrollment at the University of Hawaii are obtained. It is found that the demand is quite inelastic with respect to both tuition and total cost of education. These estimates imply that changes in tuition will not affect enrollment appreciably.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alchian, Armen A. (1968). “The Economic and Social Impact of Free Tuition,” New Individualist Review 15.
Beesley, M. E. (1965). “The Value of Time Spent in Traveling: Some New Evidence,” Economica pp32.
Campbell, Robert and Barry Siegel (1967). “The Demand for Higher Education in the United States, 1919–1964,” The American Economic Review 57.
Charles River Associates Incorporated (1972). A Disaggrerated Behaviour Model of Urban Travel Demand. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
Feldman, P. and S. Hoenack (1969). “Private Demand for Higher Education in the United States,” in The Economics and Financing of Higher Education in the United States, U.S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington.
Friedman, Milton (1955). “The Role of Government in Education,” in Robert Solo (ed.) Economics and the Public Interest. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Hansen, W. Lee (1970). “Income Distribution Effects of Higher Education,” The American Economic Review 60.
Hawaii Employers Council (1970). Pay Rates in Hawaii, Special Publication No. 91, Honolulu.
Hoenack, Stephen A. (1967). “Private Demand for Higher Education in California,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Jones, Richard (1972). “Probability Estimation Using a Multinomial Logistic Function,” mimeographed, University of Hawaii.
Lave, Charles A. (1970). “The Demand for Urban Mass Transportation,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 52.
Lovejoy, Clarence E. (1970). Lovejoy's College Guide, New York: Simon and Schuster, 19th ed.
McFadden, Daniel (1968). “The Revealed Preference of a Government Bureaucracy,” Technical Report No. 17, Project for the Evaluation and Optimization of Economic Growth, Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
Nerlove, Marc (1972). “On Tuition and the Costs of Higher Education: Prolegomena to a Conceptual Framework,” Journal of Political Economy 80.
Quarmby, D. H. (1967). “Choice of Travel Mode for the Journey to Work,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1.
Radner, R. and L. S. Miller (1970). “Demand and Supply in U.S. Higher Education: A Progress Report,” The American Economic Review 60.
Radner, R., Miller, L., Adkins, D., and Balderston, F. (1975). Demand and Supply in U.S. Higher Education. The Carnegie Foundation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Theil, Henri (1969). “A Multinomial Extension of the Linear Logit Model,” International Economic Review 10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to express their appreciation to Arthur S. Goldberger, H. Laurence Miller, and Pan A. Yotopoulos for their comments on earlier drafts of the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghali, M., Miklius, W. & Wada, R. The demand for higher education facing an individual institution. High Educ 6, 477–487 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132530
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132530