Abstract
From 1970 to 1974 an Individualized Study System (ISS) for mathematics courses for first year engineering students was developed. Because of changes in the curriculum, new courses had to be developed from August 1974. The context evaluation of these new courses (ISS-calculus) consisted mainly of the evaluation of the mathematics courses developed during the preceding years. After a year the Department decided to suspend ISS as a teaching system for calculus partly because of dissatisfaction of the teachers with ISS-calculus.
This paper consists of two parts. Part one (sections 1,2) is a case study and summarizes the development of the system from 1970 to 1975. It examines in detail the problems encountered in this development with special attention to the role of the executive teacher. The organization of an ISS-course and the planning decisions to be taken become more complex according to the number of executive teachers. In part two (sections 3,4) we provide a classification of ISS courses to illustrate the complexity of the system and we offer some general advice on the management of individualized study systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Braak, L. H. (1974). Geïndividualiseerde onderwijssystemen: konstruktie en besturing, Eindhoven (Neth.): dissertation.
Donders, J. M. (1974). Invoering ISSystemen in het curriculum. Enschede: Technische Hogeschool Twente, CDO.
Gallup, H. F. (1971). “Problems in the implementation of a course in personalized instruction.” Paper presented at “Personalized Instruction: a symposium in honor of Fred Keller”, American Psychological Association Meeting. Also in Sherman, J. G., ed., (1974).
Green, B. A. (1971). “Physics teaching by the Keller-plan at M.I.T.,” Am. J. Phys. 39: 764–775. Also in Sherman, J. G., ed., (1974).
Green, B. A. (1972). “Fifteen reasons not to use the Keller Plan,” presented at the Keller Method Workshop Conference at Rice University, Houston, Texas. Also in J. G. Sherman, ed., (1974).
Hess, J. H. (1971). “Keller-plan instruction: implementation problems.” Paper presented at Keller Plan Conference at M.I.T., Cambridge (Mass.). Also in Sherman, J. G., ed., (1974).
Klauw, C. F. van der and Plomp, Tj. (1974a). “The construction and evaluation of a feedback system,” in Verreck, W. A., ed., Methodological Problems in Research and Development in Higher Education, pp. 237–258. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Klauw, C. F. van der and Plomp, Tj. (1974b). “Individualized Study Systems in Theory and Practice,” Higher Education 3(2), 213–230.
Meer, A. van der (1975). Rapport van de begeleidingskommissie evaluatie ISS. Enschede (Neth.): T. H. Twente, Dept. of Applied Mathematics.
Meer, A. van der and Plomp, Tj. (1977). “Kontekstevaluatie van Individuele Studie Systemen,” Pedagogische Studiën 54 (July/August).
Nedelsky, L. (1954). “Absolute grading standards for objective tests,” Educ. Psychol. Meas. 14.
Pilot, A. and Kramers-Pals, H. (1973). “De constructie van een individueel studiesysteem materiaalkunde voor eerstejaars aan de T. H. Twente,” in van Woerden, W. M., et al., ed., Onderwijs in de maak. Utrecht: Spectrum, Aula 508.
Plomp, Tj. (1974). De ontwikkeling van een Individueel Studie Systeem. Groningen (Neth.): Tjeenk Willink.
Sherman, J. G., ed. (1974). Personalized System of Instruction: 41 Germinal Papers. Menlo Park (Calif.): W. A. Benjamin.
Stufflebeam, D. J., et al. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca (Ill.): F. E. Peacock Publ.
Verreck, W. A. (1973). Individualisering in het wetenschappelijk technisch onderwijs. Eindhoven: dissertation.
Vroon, A. G. (1975). “Onderwijsverbetering, een zaak van onderwijskundigen?” Universiteit en Hogeschool 22(2), 92–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plomp, T., Van Der Meer, A. Problems in the context evaluation of individualized courses. High Educ 6, 437–452 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132528
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132528