Skip to main content
Log in

Specification of objectives in decision problems

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If a decision problem is said to be difficult, one usually assumes that there is a very complicated relationship between the decision and the corresponding outcome. The problem is considered as solved when this relationship has been sorted out and described. This means that the probelm of selecting the best outcome from a set of possible outcomes, is taken as trivial. The main, or only difficulty is to find the decision which will lead to the best of the possible outcomes. The author argues that the real difficulty may often be to specify a preference ordering over the set of outcomes. He illustrates the point with examples from economics, and discusses some investment problems, in which the outcome of a decision naturally can be considered as a stochastic process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernoulli, D., ‘Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk’, Econometrica (1954) 23–46. (Translation of ‘Specimen Theoriae Novae de Mensura Sortis’, St. Petersburg 1738.)

  • Borch, K., ‘The Theory of Control Processes Applied to Insurance Companies’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance (1967a) 581–591.

  • Borch, K., ‘The Theory of Risk’, The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (1967b), 432–467.

  • Borch, K., ‘Decision Rules Depending on the Probability of Ruin’, Oxford Economic Papers (1968a) 1–10.

  • Borch, K., ‘The Optimal Portfolio of Assets in an Insurance Company’, Transactions of the 18th International Congress of Actuaries, Munich 1968b, Vol. II, pp. 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch, K., The Economics of Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, 1968c.

  • Cramér, H., ‘On the Mathematical Theory of Risk’, Skandia Jubilee Volume, 1930, pp. 7–84.

  • Neumann, J. von and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd Ed., Princeton University Press, 1947.

  • Pfanzagl, J., ‘A General Theory of Measurement: Application to Utility’, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly (1959) 283–294.

  • Redington, F., ‘Review of the Principles of Life-Office Valuation’, Journal of the Institute of Actuaries (1952) 14–73.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borch, K. Specification of objectives in decision problems. Theor Decis 1, 5–21 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132450

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132450

Keywords

Navigation