Skip to main content
Log in

Course evaluation and attitudes toward college teaching

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research suggests that attitudes may be one category of personal (student) variables that students bring to the task of evaluating college courses and their instructors. In a previous study, attitudes toward college teaching, in general, and the perceived progessivism of instructors, in particular, were associated with students' evaluations of courses. Perceived attitudes were a kind of evaluation. The results of the study raised the question as to when the attitude-evaluation relation was first formed in the course of a semester and whether a causal order between them could be established. The present study, using a repeated-measures design, replicated the major findings of the previous study on a cross-section of University of Haifa students attending 22 courses. While there is no clear evidence for the priority of either attitudes or evaluation, the findings indicate that their association is formed early in the course, with some further consolidation later on. Both attitudes and evaluations are remarkably stable during the course. In view of these findings it is suggested that classroom evaluations might be moved back to one of the first meetings of the course to allow for feedback and changes in the instructor's presentation. Moreover, perceived attitude measures could be developed into an indirect measure of teacher performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrami, P. C. and Mizener, D. A. (1983). “Does the attitude similarity of college professors and their students produce ‘bias’ in course evaluations?” American Educational Research Journal 20: 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1977). “Student ratings of instruction and their relationship to learning,” American Educational Research Journal 14: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. A. (1980). “Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction - A meta-analysis of findings,” Research of Higher Education 13: 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, F., Greenough, W. T. and Menges, R. J. (1971). “Student rating of college teaching: reliability, validity, and usefulness,” Review of Educational Research 41: 511–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K. O. and Whitely, S. E. (1974) “Student ratings as criteria for effective college teaching,” American Educational Research Journal 11: 259–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, J. E. and Kremer, L. (1978). “Course evaluation, expected grades, and attitudes toward higher education,” Studies in Education 20: 175–182 (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, J. E. and Kremer, L. (1980). “Attitudes toward higher education and course evaluation,” Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 610–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. and Gerard, H. B. (1967). Foundations of Social Psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. and Goethals, G. R. (1972). “Order effects in impression formation: attribution context and the nature of the entity,” in E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valings, and B. Weiner (eds.) Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (1973). “Cross-lagged and synchronous common factors in panel data,” in A. S. Goldberger (ed.) Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. New York: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1958). “Progressivism and traditionalism: basic factors of educational attitudes,” Journal of Social Psychology 48: 111–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. and Kulik, C. (1974). “Student ratings of instruction,” Teaching of Psychology 1: 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, L., Abrami, G. C. and Perry, R. P. (1976). “Do teacher rating forms reveal as much about students as about teachers?” Journal of Educational Psychology 68: 441–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1980). “The influence of student, course, and instructor characteristics in evaluations of university teaching,” American Educational Research Journal 17: 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Fleiner, H. and Thomas, C. S. (1975). “Validity and usefulness of student evaluations of instructional quality,” Journal of Educational Psychology 67: 833–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, T. M. (1958). “The position of persons as cognizers,” In R. Tagiuri and L. Petrullo (eds.) Person Perception and Interpersonal Behavior. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. and Bent, D. H. (eds.) (1975). Statistical Package for the Behavioral Sciences. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J. and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, T. H. (1976). “The prediction of teacher evaluation scores from knowledge of student variables,” Paper presented at the annual convention AERA, New York.

  • Rayder, N. F. (1968). “College students' ratings of instruction,” East Lansing, Mich.: Michigan State University. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. M. and Skanes, G. R. (1974). “Validity of student evaluation of teaching and the characteristics of successful instructors,” Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 584–590.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hofman, J.E., Kremer, L. Course evaluation and attitudes toward college teaching. High Educ 12, 681–690 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132424

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132424

Keywords

Navigation