Skip to main content
Log in

When professors confront themselves: Towards a theoretical conceptualization of video self-confrontation in higher education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of video self-confrontation (VSC)Footnote 1 as a method to reinforce desired behaviors or induce changes in human behavior, has been increasing in recent years. The major reviewers of the literature on VSC in the last three decades point out that there is relatively little qualitative and quantitative research which explores the underlying processes of VSC and its theoretical conceptualization. Moreover, there is still a need to prove many of the claims advanced by practitioners about the effectiveness of VSC.

This article reviews two of the theoretical conceptualizations and tentative explanations of the VSC process. The first is based on affect, such as self-confrontation, dissonance, anxiety, stress, distress and eustress. The second explanation is based on a cognitive and information-processing approach and includes: feedback, self-concept, self-efficacy and attribution theories. The article describes an emerging integrated conceptualization which may provide better insight into the process which should be the focus of further studies.

The main purpose of VSC in higher education is to improve teaching-learning processes. Faculty's commitment to this purpose is determined by many factors, such as: their perception and attitudes towards the research/teaching dichotomy and the university's reward system; their motivation and concepts of self-efficacy and self-fulfillment; and their attribution mechanisms of success or failure in teaching. All these factors greatly influence their readiness to be motivated in VSC processes and the effectiveness of their VSC uses. VSC is a powerful technique which has a great potential in facilitating behavioral changes. It can cause harm or be wasted if not used properly. Suggestions for optimal uses are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Throughout the paper, the abbreviation VSC will be used for video self-confrontation.

References

  • Alger, I. and Hogan, P. (1969). “Enduring effects of videotaped playback experiences on family and marital relationships,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 39: 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, A. and Brunse, A. J. (1974). “Impact and possible casualty from video tape feedback in marital therapy,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42: 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. G. and Sowder, W. T. (1978). “Audiotape and videotape self-confrontation in psychotherapy,” Psychological Bulletin 74: 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977a). “Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change,” Psychological Review 84: 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977b). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1978a). “Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change,” Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy 1: 139–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1978b). “Reflections on self-efficacy,” Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy 1(6): 238–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belger, T. C. and Cooper, R. M. (eds.) (1950). The Preparation of Teachers. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M. M. (ed.) (1971). Videotape Techniques in Psychiatric Training and Treatment. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M. M. (ed.) (1978). Videotape Techniques in Psychiatric Training and Treatment (2nd ed.). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict Arousal and Curiosity. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bess, J. L. (ed.) (1982a). Motivating Professors to Teach Effectively. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bess, J. L. (1982b). University Organizations: A Matrix Analysis of the Academic Professions. New York: Human Sciences Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierschenk, B. (1974). “Perceptual evaluative and behavioral changes through externally mediated self-confrontation,” Didakometry 41.

  • Cammann, C. (1982). “Feedback systems for teachers,” in J. L. Bess (ed.), Motivating Professors to Teach Effectively. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. I. (1982). Confrontation Analysis: Theory and Practice. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danet, B. B. (1982). “Self-confrontation in psychotherapy reviewed,” American Journal of Psychotherapy 22: 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, G. (1951). “Some criteria for the timing of confrontation and interpretations,” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 32: 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewald, P. A. (1964). Psychotherapy, A Dynamic Approach. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). “A theory of social comparison processes,” Human Relations 7: 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, D. (1975). “Self-confrontation: A broader conceptual base?” British Journal of Teacher Education 1: 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryrear, J. L. and Fleshman, B. (1981). Video Therapy in Mental Health. Springfield, Ill.: Charles Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, F. F. and Manning, B. B. (1973). “Self-confrontation reviewed: A conceptualization for video playback in teacher education,” Review of Educational Research 43: 469–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, S. L. (1971). “Research on client variables in psychotherapy,” in A. E. Bergin and S. L. Garfield (eds.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change: An Empirical Analysis. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstma, R. and Mackie, J. B. (eds.) (1969). Studies in Self Cognition: Techniques of Video Self Observation in the Behavioral Sciences. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. M. and Brenman, M. (1959). Hypnosis and Related States. New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. T. and Bazerman, M. H. (1982). “Organization design and faculty motivation to teach,” in J. L. Bess (ed.), Motivating Professors to Teach Effectively. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1944). “Social perception and phenomenal causality,” Psychological Review 51: 358–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzman, P. S. (1969). “On hearing and seeing oneself,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 148(3): 198–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, J. H. F. and Rosenthal, T. L. (1978). “Therapeutic videotaped playback: a critical review,” Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy 1: 103–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, J. H. and Rosenthal, T. L. (1981). “Therapeutic videotaped playback,” in J. L. Fryrear and B. Fleshman (eds.), Videotherapy in Mental Health. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, Pubs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. (1981). “Invidious mirror? Ethical problems in the use of videorecordings,” in J. L. Fryrear and B. Fleshman, Videotherapy in Mental Health. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, Pubs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., Kanouse, D. I., Kelley, H. H., Nisbett, R. E., Valins, S. and Weiner, B. (eds) (1972). Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B. R. and Showers, B. (1980). “Improving in-service training: the messages of research,” Educational Leadership 37(5): 379–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B. R. and Showers, B. (1981a). “The coaching of teaching: ensuring transfer from training”. Unpublished paper, Booksend Laboratories, Palo Alto, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B. R. and Showers, B. (1981b). “Teacher training research: working hypotheses for program design and directions for future study”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles.

  • Kagan, N. (1978). “Interpersonal process recall: media in clinical and human interaction supervision,” in M. M. Berger (ed.), Videotape Techniques in Psychiatric Training and Treatment. New York: Brunner/ Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, F. (1970). “Self-monitoring: methodological limitations and clinical applications,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 35: 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaswan, J. and Love, L. R. (1969). “Confrontation as a method a psychological intervention,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 148(3): 224–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, H. C. and Cundick, B. F. (1977). “Emotional impact of videotape and reenacted feedback on subjects with high and low defenses,” Journal of Counseling Psychology 47: 377–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffman, M. L. (1978). “A study of the effects of videotape feedback and analyses on the classroom behavior and student achievement of university teaching assistants,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

  • Levinson-Rose, J. and Menges, R. J. (1981). “Improving college teaching: a critical review of research,” Review of Educational Research 51: 403–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1948). “Conduct knowledge and acceptance of new values,” in K. Lewin (ed.), Resolving Social Conflicts. New York: Harper & Brother.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G. (1976). “Self-confrontation revisited,” British Journal of Teacher Education 2: 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and Personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAleese, R. (1977). “An archtype of self-confrontation in teacher training,” Unpublished paper, University of Aberdeen.

  • Melnik, M. A. (1972). “The development and analysis of a clinic to improve university teaching,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

  • Merriam-Webster, Thomas Allan & Son Ltd. (1981). Webster New Collegiate Dictionary. Toronto: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielson, G. (1964). Studies in Self-Confrontation. Cleveland: Howard Allen, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. A. (1967). “Conflicting academic loyalties,” in C. B. J. Lee, Improving College Teaching. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noam, J. (1973). “Development and evaluation of a model for improving university teaching,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

  • Parsons, T. and Platt, G. (1968). “The American academic profession: A pilot study,” Unpublished manuscript, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Perlberg, A. (1976). “The use of laboratory systems in improving university teaching,” Higher Education 5: 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlberg, A. (1978). “When professors confront themselves: The use of video self-confrontation (VSC) in improving teaching in higher education,” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Improving University Teaching, Aachen.

  • Perlberg, A. (1981). “Towards a qualitative analysis of teaching learning processes,” Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Improving University Teaching, Tsukuba, Japan.

  • Perlberg, A. (1983a). “Towards a theoretical conceptualization of instructional evaluation,” Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Montreal.

  • Perlberg, A. (1983b). “Video self-confrontation in higher education: A theoretical conceptualization,” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Improving University Teaching, Dublin, Ireland.

  • Perlberg, A. (1983c). “When professors confront themselves: The use of video self-confrontation VSC in improving teaching in higher education,” in O. Zuber-Skerritt (ed.), Video in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page Ltd. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlberg, A. (1983d). “The use of video self-confrontation in psychological therapy,” in M. Hunter (ed.), Application of New Technology to Psychological Therapy. England: International Association of Applied Psychology (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlberg, A. (1984). “Instructional evaluation and the improvement of teaching-learning processes: Directions for a theoretical conceptualization,” Higher Education in Europe (UNESCO), accepted for publication.

  • Perlberg, A. and O'Bryant, D. C. (1970). “Videotaping and microteaching techniques to improve engineering instruction,” Journal of Engineering Education, 60: 741–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlberg, A., Peri, J., Weinrib, M., Nitzan, E. and Shimron, J. (1972). “Microteaching and videotaping recordings: A new approach to improving teaching,” Journal of Medical Education 47: 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlberg, A., Bar-On, E., Levin, R., Bar-Yam, M., Lewy, A. and Etrog, A. (1974). “Modification of teaching behavior through the combined use of microteaching techniques with the Technion Diagnostic System, T.D.S.,” Journal of Instructional Sciences 3: 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, M. S., Loeb, D. G., Gumpert, G., O'Hara, F. and Highie, I. S. (1967). “Family diagnosis and therapy using videotape playback,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 37: 900–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1942). “The use of electrically-recorded interviews in improving psychotherapeutic techniques,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 12: 229–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronchi, D. and Ripple, R. E. (1972). Video playback: To see ourselves as others see us. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Ill.

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). “Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement,” Psychological Monographs 80(1): (Whole No. 609).

  • Sanborn, D., Pyke, H. R. and Sanborn, C. J. (1975). “Videotape playback and psychotherapy: a review,” Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 12: 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H. (1956). The Stress of Life. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H. (1974). Stress Without Distress. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H. (1976). The Stress of Life (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H. (1978). “On the real benefits of eustress,” Psychology Today 2(10): 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H. (1980). “The stress concept today,” in I. L. Kutash, L. B. Schlesinger and Associates, Handbook on Stress and Anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivack, J. D. (1974). “Interpersonal process recall: implications for psychotherapy,” Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 11: 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, F. H. (1968). “Use of videotape (focused feedback) in group counselling and group therapy,” Journal of Research and Development in Education 1(2): 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1982). “An attribution theory of motivation and emotion,” in H. W. Krohne and L. Loux (eds.), Achievement, Stress and Anxiety. New York: Hemisphere Pub. Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. D. (1967). “Teach me and I will hold my tongue,” in Lee Calvin, B.T., Improving College Teaching. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. D. (1981). Student Learning in Higher Education. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perlberg, A. When professors confront themselves: Towards a theoretical conceptualization of video self-confrontation in higher education. High Educ 12, 633–663 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132422

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132422

Keywords

Navigation