Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of three granular support materials for anaerobic fluidized bed systems

  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Three different materials, kaolin, pozzolana and biolite (a material used in a commercial anaerobic fluidized bed treatment process) when tested as supports for an anaerobic fluidized bed system had similar physical and fluidization properties but behaved differently towards the biomass hold-up. However, all three systems attained similar removal efficiency rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

U:

Fluidization velocity (m/s)

U1 :

Terminal fluidization velocity (m/s)

g:

Local acceleration due to gravity (m/s2)

ϱ s :

Solid density (kg/m3)

ϱ f :

Fluid density (kg/m3)

ΔP:

Pressure drop (Pa)

HRT:

Hydraulic retention time (days)

Hmf :

Height of bed at minimum fluidization (m)

H:

Height of bed (m)

Cd :

Drag coefficient (dimensionless)

W:

Mass of solids in bed (kg)

dp:

Particle diameter (m)

A:

Cross-sectional area of column (m2)

h:

column height (m)

Rct :

Terminal Reynolds no.

ɛ:

Voidagc (fractional free volume, dimensionless)

ɛmf :

Voidage (fractional free volume) at minimum of fluidization (dimensionless)

References

  • Andrews, G. (1988) In: Handbook of Anaerobic Fermentations; L. Erickson & D. Yee-Chak eds. 766–775. NY: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaguer, M. D., Paris, D. and J.M. Paris (1993) Ingeniería Química. 25, 173–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borja, R., Duran, M. and A. Martin (1993) Biores. Technol. 4, 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büttgenbach, L. and P. Weilan, (1989) Dechema Biotechnology Conferences 3, 99, 829–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, P., Suidan, M. T. and J. Band, (1990) Wat. Res. 24, 827–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancher, C., Taylor, P. and J. Napier (1978) Biotechnol. Bioeng. 8, 361–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijnen, J., Mulder, A., Enger, W. and F. Hoeks (1989) Chem.Eng. J. 41, B37-B50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iza, J., Garcia, P., Sanz, I., Hernando, S. and F. Fdz-Polanco (1988) Proc. of the 5th Int. Conference on anaerobic Digestion. 155–163.

  • Murray, W. and L. van der Berg (1981) J. Appl. Bacteriol. 51, 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirbarazi, M., Voice, T. and W. Weber (1990) Haz. Was. and Haz. Mat. 7, 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi, A. (1988) In: III Seminario de Depuración Anaerobia de Aguas Residuales. Universidad de Valladolid, 11–20. Valladolid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakiadis, B. (1984) In: Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook. D. W. Green and J. O. Maloney, eds. 5-63 – 5-65, Mc Graw-Hill Inc.

  • Setiadi, T. (1995) Wat. Sci. Tech. 31, No. 9, 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, P. (1980) Adv. in Biotech. Vol. II: Fuels, Chemicals and Wastetreatment. M. Murray, ed. 607–613, Pergamon Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García-Calderón, D., Buffière, P., Moletta, R. et al. Comparison of three granular support materials for anaerobic fluidized bed systems. Biotechnol Lett 18, 731–736 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130774

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130774

Key words

Navigation