Advertisement

Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 161–175 | Cite as

Evolution, altruism, and the prisoner's dilemma

  • Ishtiyaque Haji
Article
  • 146 Downloads

Abstract

I first argue against Peter Singer's exciting thesis that the Prisoner's Dilemma explains why there could be an evolutionary advantage in making reciprocal exchanges that are ultimately motivated by genuine altruism over making such exchanges on the basis of enlightened long-term self-interest. I then show that an alternative to Singer's thesis — one that is also meant to corroborate the view that natural selection favors genuine altruism, recently defended by Gregory Kavka, fails as well. Finally, I show that even granting Singer's and Kavka's claim about the selective advantage of altruism proper, it is doubtful whether that type of claim can be used in a particular sort of sociobiological argument against psychological egoism.

Key words

Altruism evolution Prisoner's Dilemma sociobiology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, R.: 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Brandon, R.N. and R.M. Burian (eds.): 1984, Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies over the Units of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  3. Brandt, R.: 1979, A Theory of the Good and the Right, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Dawkins, R.: 1976, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Feldman, R.: 1988, ‘Rationality, Reliability, and Natural Selection’, Philosophy of Science 55, 218–227.Google Scholar
  6. Haji, I.: forthcoming, ‘Escaping or Avoiding the Prisoner's Dilemma?’, Dialogue.Google Scholar
  7. Kahane, H.: 1985, ‘Making the World Sale for Reciprocity’, in J. Feinberg (ed.), Reason and Responsibility, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California.Google Scholar
  8. Kavka, G.S.: 1986, Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  9. Lycan, W.: 1985, ‘Epistemic Value’, Synthese 64, 137–164.Google Scholar
  10. MacIntosh, D.: forthcoming, ‘Preference's Progress: Rational Self-Alteration and the Rationality of Morality’, Dialogue.Google Scholar
  11. Mackie, J.L.: 1978, ‘The Law of the Jungle: Moral Alternatives and Principles of Evolution’, Philosophy 53, 455–464.Google Scholar
  12. Parfit, D.: 1986, Reasons and Persons, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Ruse, M.: 1980, ‘Charles Darwin and Group Selection’, Annals of Science 37, 615–630.Google Scholar
  14. Sayre-McCord, G.: 1989, ‘Deception and Reasons to Be Moral’, American Philosophical Quarterly 26, 113–122.Google Scholar
  15. Singer, P.: 1981, The Expanding Circle, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Sober, E.: 1981, ‘The Evolution of Rationality’, Synthese 64, 137–164.Google Scholar
  17. Sober, E.: 1988, ‘What Is Evolutionary Altruism?’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supp. Vol. 14, 75–99.Google Scholar
  18. Trivers, R.: 1971, ‘The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism’, Quarterly Review of Biology 46, 35–57.Google Scholar
  19. Williams, G.C.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ishtiyaque Haji
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyBritish Columbia

Personalised recommendations