Skip to main content
Log in

A corpus-based analysis of Mandarin nominal root compound

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Mandarin has many compound-like expressions which seem to be derived directly from (non-word) roots. For example, yi, the root of the word ma yi ‘ant’, occurs in many derived words, including gong yi ‘worker ant’. It seems reasonable to analyze these constructions as compounds, yet traditional theories of compounding as well as recent work on Mandarin morphology (Dai (1992)) have assumed that true compounding is word-based. Dai further implies that only true compounding is productive and that what we shall term ‘root compounding’ is unproductive, thus apparently strengthening the distinction between the two types.

We show, using a corpus-based measure of morphological productivity due to Baayen (1989), that many nominal roots in fact productively form root compounds; thus, at least on the basis of productivity, there is no compelling reason to consider word and root compounding as distinct morphological processes. The question arises of why root compounds (as opposed to word compounds) are formed. As a partial answer we provide a preliminary analysis of the semantics of nominal roots, arguing that they represent kinds (Carlson (1977)); root compounds are formed when the ‘kind’ interpretation is appropriate, though stylistic issues are argued also to be involved. We also consider a prosodic constraint on (root) compounding proposed by Lu and Duanmu (1991) and show that this constraint can be overridden when semantic or stylistic considerations demand it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Stephen (1992) A-Morphous Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, Harald (1989) A Corpus-Based Approach to Morphological Productivity: Statistical Analysis and Psycholinguistic Interpretation, PhD dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, Harald (1993) “On Frequency, Transparency and Productivity,” Yearbook of Morphology 1992, 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, Harald and Rochelle Lieber (1991) “Productivity and English Derivation: a Corpus-Based Study,” Linguistics 29, 801–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, Leonard (1933) Language, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Gregory (1977) Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst; distributed by GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Yuen-Ren (1968) A Grammar of Spoken Chinese, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, Kenneth and William Gale (1991) “A Comparison of the Enhanced Good-Turing and Deleted Estimation Methods for Estimating Probabilities of English Bigrams,” Computer Speech and Language 5, 19–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, John X.-L. (1992) Chinese Morphology and its Interface with the Syntax, PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.

  • Duanmu, San (to appear) Wordhood in Chinese, ms., University of Michigan; to appear in J. Packard (ed.) Word Formation in Chinese, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

  • Good, I. (1953) “The Population Frequencies of Species and the Estimation of Population Parameters,” Biometrica V 40, 237–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Chu-Ren, Kathleen Ahrens and Keh-jiann Chen (1993) “A Data-Driven Approach to Psychological Reality of the Mental Lexicon: Two Studies on Chinese Corpus Linguistics,” paper presented at the Conference on Language and its Psychobiological Bases, 1990; ms. Academia Sinica, Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S.-S. (1987) “Shi Lun Chengci Yusu long Buchengci Yusu de Qufen [A Discussion on the Distinction between Wordlike and Non-Wordlike Morphemes],” Xiandai Yuyanxue 10, 122–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.-H. Audrey (1991) Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Bingfu and San Duanmu (1991) “A Case Study of the Relation between Rhythm and Syntax in Chinese,” paper presented at the Third North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, Cornell University.

  • McCarthy, John and Alan Prince (to appear) Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction, ms. Rutgers University; to appear MIT Press, Cambridge.

  • Packard, Jerome (1990) “A Lexical Morphology Approach to Word Formation in Mandarin,” Yearbook of Morphology 1989, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky (1993) Optimality Theory, Technical Report 2, Rutgers University.

  • Selkirk, Elizabeth (1982) The Syntax of Words, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, Richard and Chilin Shih (1993) “Why Mandarin Morphology is not Stratum-Ordered,” Yearbook of Morphology 1992, 185–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, Richard, Chilin Shih, William Gale and Nancy Chang (1994) “A Stochastic Finite-State Word-Segmentation Algorithm for Chinese,” in Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of 32nd Annual Meeting, pp. 66–73.

  • Tang, Ting-chi (1994) “More on the Relation between Word-Syntax and Sentence-Syntax,” paper presented at the Sixth North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, University of Southern California.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sproat, R., Shih, C. A corpus-based analysis of Mandarin nominal root compound. J East Asian Linguis 5, 49–71 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129805

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129805

Keywords

Navigation