Skip to main content
Log in

Conditioned demand and professional response

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article draws attention to two basic features of British higher education which may influence the workability of certain Leverhulme proposals. These are vertical integration and professionalism. It is suggested that a consideration of these is crucial given the nature of the Leverhulme strategy. Many of the Leverhulme proposals are grounded in assumptions about the behaviour of institutions and actors in British higher education. An examination of vertical integration and professionalism in the system indicates that such assumptions may be unfounded. The discussion focuses both on how the proposals themselves are shaped by the professionalism of British higher education, and on how the feasibility of the proposals may be affected by the system's vertical integration and professionalism. Both the basic proposals of Leverhulme as a whole as well as of the monographs on access, teachers and learning, and institutional change are examined. In concluding it is noted that the treatment of vertical integration and professionalism provide policy makers and reformers with important levers of control to grasp in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, Stephen J. (1981). “Continuity and conflict in comprehensive schooling,” Universities Quarterly 35 (2): 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Paul and Sparkes, John (1982). “Teaching and learning,” in D. Bligh (ed.) Professionalism and Flexibility in Learning. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, Colin (1981). “Problems of articulation between secondary and higher education in England and Wales,” European Journal of Education 16 (2): 153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerych, Ladislav (1983). “International comparisons,” Appendix to Williams and Blackstone Response to Adversity. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Lex (1975). Policy and the Polytechnics. Farnborough, Hants: Saxon House/ Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, Lars (1983). “Upper Secondary School and Higher Education in Sweden: How do they Relate?” paper presented at the conference “The Relation Between Secondary and Higher Education: An International View” held at UCLA from July 25–28, 1983.

  • Elton, Lewis (1982). “Assessment for learning,” in D. Bligh (ed.) Professionalism and Flexibility in Learning. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J. and Wilson, J. (1977). Degrees of Excellence: The Academic Achievement Game. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Excellence in Diversity (1983). Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

  • Farrant, John H. (1981). “Trends in admissions,” in O. Fulton (ed.) Access to Higher Education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, Oliver (1981). “Principles and policies,” in O. Fulton (ed.) Access to Higher Education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Alan (1981). “The educational choices of young people,” in O. Fulton (ed.) Access to Higher Education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J., McPherson, A. and Raffe, D. (1983). Reconstructions of Secondary Education: Theory Myth and Practice Since the War. London: RKP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, Gordon E. and Ramagli, Howard J. (1980). “Alternatives to student ratings of college teaching,” Journal of Higher Education 51 (6): 673–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H., Heath, A. F. and Ridge, J. M. (1980). Origins and Destinations: Family, Class, and Education in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Robert H. and Abernathy, William J. (1980). “Managing our way to economic decline,” Harvard Business Review 58 (4): 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggart, Richard, Stephens, Michael, Taylor, John and Smethurst, Richard (1982). “Continuing Education Within Universities and Polytechnics,” in D. Bligh (ed.) Professionalism and Flexibility in Learning. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D. A. (1979). “Academic decision-making: The BEd degree in British universities,” Higher Education Review Spring, pp. 172\-41.

  • Hughes, Everett (1958). Men and Their Work. New York: Glencoe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Lauriston R. (1978). The Washington Lobbyists for Higher Education. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, Robert M. (1981). “The challenge of market imperatives,” in R. M. Lindley (ed.) Higher Education and the Labour Market. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lon Hefferlin, J. B. (1969). Dynamics of Academic Reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maden, Margaret (1983). “The Relation Between Secondary Education and Higher Education in England and Wales,” paper presented at the conference “The Relation Between Secondary and Higher Education: An International View” held at UCLA from July 25–28, 1983.

  • Moss, G. D. and Brew, A. (1981). “The contribution of the Open University to innovation in higher education,” Higher Education 10 (2): 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peston, Maurice (1981). “Higher education policy,” in R. M. Lindley (ed.) Higher Education and the Labour Market. Guilford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Peter (1982). “NABs 3 into 2,” editorial for Times Higher Education Supplement n. 522 November 5, 1982.

  • Silver, Harold (1981). “Teacher education: who are the conservatives?” Universities Quarterly 35 (2): 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, C. P. (1972). “Selective secondary education, social class and the development of adolescent subcultures,” British Journal of Educational Psychology 42 (1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, William (1982). “Change within a contracting system,” in L. Wagner (ed.) Agenda for Institutional Change in Higher Education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, Ulrich (1983). “The Relation Between Secondary and Higher Education in the Federal Republic of Germany” paper presented at the conference “The Relation Between Secondary and Higher Education: An International View” held at UCLA from July 25–28, 1983.

  • Times Higher Education Supplement (1982). 10/9/82 n. 514 p. 9.

  • Times Higher Education Supplement (1983). 27/5/83 n. 551 pp. i–iv.

  • Trow, Martin (1981). “Comparative perspectives on access,” in O. Fulton (ed.) Access to Higher Education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Gareth and Tessa Blackstone (1983). Response to Adversity: Higher Education in a Harsh Climate. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is a Postdoctoral Research Scholar with the Comparative Higher Education Research Group at the UCLA Graduate School of Education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rhoades, G. Conditioned demand and professional response. High Educ 13, 139–169 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129489

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129489

Keywords

Navigation