Skip to main content
Log in

Ordinal utility models of decision making under uncertainty

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies two models of rational behavior under uncertainty whose predictions are invariant under ordinal transformations of utility. The ‘quantile utility’ model assumes that the agent maximizes some quantile of the distribution of utility. The ‘utility mass’ model assumes maximization of the probability of obtaining an outcome whose utility is higher than some fixed critical value. Both models satisfy weak stochastic dominance. Lexicographic refinements satisfy strong dominance.

The study of these utility models suggests a significant generalization of traditional ideas of riskiness and risk preference. We define one action to be riskier than another if the utility distribution of the latter crosses that of the former from below. The single crossing property is equivalent to a ‘minmax spread’ of a random variable. With relative risk defined by the single crossing criterion, the risk preference of a quantile utility maximizer increases with the utility distribution quantile that he maximizes. The risk preference of a utility mass maximizer increases with his critical utility value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K.: 1951, ‘Alternative Approaches to the Theory of Choice in Risk Taking Situations’, Econometrics 19, 404–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, H.: (1930), ‘On the Mathematical Theory of Risk’, Forsakring-saktiebolaget Skandias Festskrift, Stockholm: Centraltryckeriet, 7–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J.: 1974, ‘Axiomatic Theories of Choice, Cardinal Utility and Subjective Probability: A Review’, in J. Drèze (ed.), Allocation Under Uncertainty: Equilibrium and Optimally, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.: 1981, ‘Subjective Expected Utility: A Review of Normative Theories’, Theory and Decision 13, 139–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fréchet, M.: 1951, ‘Sur les tableaux de corrélation dont les marges sont données’, Annals de Université de Lyon A, Séries 3, 14, 53–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: 1979, ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk’, Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.: 1982, ‘“Expected Utility” Analysis Without the Independence Axiom’, Econometrica 50, 277–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J.: 1950, ‘Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility’, Econometrica 18, 111–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W. and Powell, J.: 1987, ‘Asymmetric Least Squares Estimation and Testing’, Econometrica 55, 819–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ord, J.: 1972, Families of Frequency Distributions, Griffin's Statistical Monographs & Courses No. 30, New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J.: 1970, ‘Increasing Risk I: A Definition’, Journal of Economic Theory 2, 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.: 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manski, C.F. Ordinal utility models of decision making under uncertainty. Theor Decis 25, 79–104 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129169

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129169

Keywords

Navigation