Skip to main content
Log in

Petroleum bioremediation — a multiphase problem

  • Published:
Biodegradation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons is a multiphase reaction, involving oxygen gas, water-insoluble hydrocarbons, water, dissolved salts and microorganisms. The fact that the first step in hydrocarbon catabolism involves a membrane-bound oxygenase makes it essential for microorganisms to come into direct contact with the hydrocarbon substrate. Growth then proceeds on the hydrocarbon/water interface. Bacteria have developed two general strategies for enhancing contact with water-insoluble hydrocarbons: specific adhesion mechanisms and production of extracellular emulsifying agents. Since petroleum is a complex mixture of many different classes of hydrocarbons, of which any particular microorganism has the potential to degrade only part, it follows that the microorganisms must also have a mechanism for desorbing from used' oil droplets.

The major limitations in bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated water and soil is available sources of nitrogen and phosphorus. The usual sources of these materials, e.g. ammonium sulfate and phosphate salts, have a high water solubility which reduces their effectiveness in open systems because of rapid dilution. We have attempted to overcome this problem by the use of a new controlled-release, hydrophobic fertilizer, F-1, which is a modified urea-formaldehyde polymer containing 18% N and 10% P as P2O5. Microorganisms were obtained by enrichment culture that could grow on crude oil as the carbon and energy source and F-1 as the nitrogen and phosphorus source. The microorganisms and the F-1 adhered to the oil/water interface, as observed microscopically and by the fact that degradation proceeded even when the water phase was removed and replaced seven times with unsupplemented water — a simulated open system. Strains which can use F-1 contain a cell-bound, inducible enzyme which depolymerizes F-1.

After optimizing conditions in the laboratory for the use of F-1 and the selected bacteria for degrading crude oil, a field trial was performed on an oil contaminated sandy beach between Haifa and Acre, Israel, in the summer of 1992. The sand was treated with 5 g F-1 per kg sand and inoculated with the selected bacteria; the plot was watered with sea water and plowed daily. After 28 days the average hydrocarbon content of the sand decreased from 5.1 mg per g sand to 0.6 mg per g sand. Overall, there was an approx. 86% degradation of pentane extractables as demonstrated by dry weight, I.R. and GLC analyses. An untreated control plot showed only a 15% decrease in hydrocarbons. During the winter of 1992, the entire beach (approx. 200 tons of crude oil) was cleaned using the F-1 bacteria technology. The rate of degradation was 0.06 mg g-1 sand day-1 (10°C) compared to 0.13 mg g-1 sand day-1 during the summer (25°C).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atlas RM (1991) Microbial hydrocarbon degradation-bioremediation of oil spills. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechn. 52: 149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas RM & Bartha R (1973) Stimulated biodegradation of oil slicks using oleophilic fertilizers. Environ. Sci. & Technol. 7: 538–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartha R (1990) Bioremediation potential of terrestrial fuel spills. AEM 56: 652–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerniglia CE (1984) Microbial transformation of aromatic hydrocarbons. In: Atlas RM (Ed) Petroleum Microbiology (pp 98–128). Macmillan Publishing Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutcher SE & Geary PJ (1979) Properties of the iron-sulphur proteins of the benzene dioxygenase system from Pseudomonas putida. Biochem. J. 177: 393–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagley S (1971) Catabolism of aromatic compounds by microorganisms. Adv. Microbiol. Physiol. 6: 1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Foght JM, Gutnick DL & Westlake DWS (1989) Effect of emulsan on biodegradation of crude oil by pure and mixed bacterial cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55: 36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson DT (1968) Microbial degradation of aromatic compounds. Science 161: 1093–1097

    Google Scholar 

  • Giger W & Blumer M (1974) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the environment: Isolation and characterization by chromatography, visible, ultraviolet and mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 46: 1663–1671

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser JA (1991) Nutrient-enhanced bioremediation of oil-contaminated shoreline: The Valdez experience. In: Hinchee RE & Olfenbuttel RF (Eds) On Site Bioreclamation (pp 336–384). Butterworth-Heinemann, Stoneham, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisatsuka K, Nakahara T, Sano N & Yamada K (1971) Formation of rhamnolipid by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its function in hydrocarbon fermentation. Agric. Biol. Chem. 35 686–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh S & Suzuki T (1972) Effect of rhamnolipids on growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant deficient in n-paraffin utilizing ability. Agric. Biol. Chem. 36: 2233–2235

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappeli O & Finnerty WR (1980) Characteristics of hexadecane partition by the growth medium of Acinetobacter sp. Biotech. Bioeng. 22: 495–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovetz AJ (1971) Subterminal oxidation of aliphatic hydrocarbons by microorganisms. CRC Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 1: 225–238

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna EJ & Kallio RE (1965) The biology of hydrocarbons. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 19: 183–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RM & Bartha R (1989) Evidence from liposome encapsulation for transport-limited microbioal metabolism of solid alkanes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55: 269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakahara T, Hisatsuka K & Minoda Y (1981) Effect of hydrocarbon emulsification on growth and respiration of microorganisms in hydrocarbon media. J. Ferm. Technol. 59: 415–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry JJ (1984) Microbial metabolism of cyclic alkanes. In: Atlas RM (Ed) Petroleum Microbiology (pp 61–98). Macmillan Publishing Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard PH, Mueller JG, Rogers JC, Kremer FV & Glaser JA (1992) Oil spill bioremediation: experiences, lessons and results from the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska. Biodegradation 3: 315–335 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg E (1986) Microbial surfactants. CRC Crit. Rev. in Biotechnol. 3: 109–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg E (1991) Hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria. In: Ballows A (Ed) The Prokaryotes (pp 441–459). Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg M, Hayer EA, Delaria J & Rosenberg E (1982) Role of thin fimbriae in adherence and growth of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus RAG-1 on hexadecane. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44: 929–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg E, Kaplan N, Pines O, Rosenberg M & Gutnick D (1983) Capsular polysaccharides interfere with adherence of Acinetobacter. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 17: 157–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg M & Rosenberg E (1985) Bacterial adherence at the hydrocarbon-water interface. Oil & Petrochem. Pollution 2: 155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg E, Rosenberg M, Shoham Y, Kaplan N & Sar N (1989) Adhesion and desorption during growth of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus on hydrocarbons. In: Cohen Y & Rosenberg E (Eds) Microbial Mats (pp 218–226). ASM Publications, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer ME & Finnerty WR (1984) Microbial metabolism of straight-chain and branched alkanes. In: Atlas RM (Ed) Petroleum Microbiology (pp 1–60). Macmillan Publishing Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson FJ (1966) Lipids in soil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 43: 203–210

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenberg, E., Legmann, R., Kushmaro, A. et al. Petroleum bioremediation — a multiphase problem. Biodegradation 3, 337–350 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129092

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129092

Key words

Navigation