Skip to main content
Log in

Reconciling university autonomy with public accountability: The state, University Grants Committee and higher education in New Zealand

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes the contemporary role of the University Grants Committee (UGC) vis-à-vis New Zealand's universities and the Department of Education. Emphasis is given to the historical and political factors which resulted in devolution of the University of New Zealand in the early 1960s and brought the UGC into being. Established to guide the development of the university system in a period of budgetary expansion, the UGC assesses the financial needs of the universities and the national need for new academic programs. Recent financial exigency prompted the government to introduce restrictions on the financial autonomy of the universities. The UGC has lost some of its autonomy in consequence, but a fundamental change in its relationship to government or in its protective role with respect to the universities is considered unlikely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby, E. (1966). Universities: British, Indian, African. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Commonwealth Universities (1963). Commonwealth Universities Yearbook. London: ACU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdhal, R. (1982). “Co-ordinating Structures: The UGC and U.S. State Coordinating Agencies.” Unpublished manuscript.

  • Berdhal, R. O. (1959). British Universities and the State. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdhal, R. (1982). “Cutting the budget, resetting the priorities,” Change August: 38–43.

  • Dalziel, P. (1981). “The politics of settlement,” in W. H. Oliver, (ed.), The Oxford History of New Zealand. Wellington: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (1980). Education Statistics of New Zealand. Wellington: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisemon, T. O. (1984). “The political economy of New Zealand's scientific development,” Pacific Viewpoints 25: 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of New Zealand, (1981). Estimates of the Expenditures of the Government of New Zealand. Wellington: GNZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, H. (1979). The University of New Zealand. Dunedin: John McIndoe Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, A. (1962). Anatomy of Britain. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. M. Treasury (1919). Treasury Minutes of July 14, 1919. London: HMT.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1982). Statistical Yearbook. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee (1921). Report, February 3, 1921. London: UGC.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee (1978). Universities Act 1961, Revised to January 1976. Wellington: UGC.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee (1980). Reports of the University Grants Committee and University Institutions, 1979. Wellington: UGC.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee (1982). Reports of the University Grants Committee and University Institutions, 1981. Wellington: UGC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eisemon, T.O. Reconciling university autonomy with public accountability: The state, University Grants Committee and higher education in New Zealand. High Educ 13, 583–594 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128567

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128567

Keywords

Navigation