Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The British University Grants Committee 1919–83: Changing relationships with government and the universities

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since its creation in 1919 the University Grants Committee (UGC) has been seen in Britain and many other countries as a model piece of machinery for channelling funds from Government to universities. Over these 60 years there have been many changes and fluctuations in its relationships both with Government and universities, and its effectiveness has varied, depending on the circumstances of the period.

Up till World War II the UGC achieved its purpose of serving as “a buffer or shock absorber” (UGC, 1968). These metaphors picture a largely reactive body responding to initiatives either by Government or the universities. After the Second World War there were calls for the UGC to play a more positive role in university development and national planning and its terms of reference were changed. The UGC's response to this change has been variable and only in the period post 1979 has it consistently played the broader role envisaged for it in 1946 although its rhetoric claimed this role for it in the 1960s. This more active role in the 1980s has brought mixed reactions: more respect from the Government but more criticism from the universities.

Insofar as this criticism relates to the processes used by the UGC during its selective retrenchment activities (1981–83), these could be improved by a strengthened UGC; insofar as the criticisms relate to the basic idea of a committee composed primarily of academics apparently aiding and abetting a Government's policy to cut back higher education, the future viability of the UGC idea itself is called into question.

Another variable in the UGC's future is connected with the recently created National Advisory Board for Local Authority Higher Education (NAB). Discussions have ranged widely over the future options for the coordination of higher education: a merger of the two bodies, their separate development or creation of an overarching body over both sectors and their respective agencies. For the moment, however, the continued existence of the UGC represents an extraordinary example of institutional longevity over a period when immense changes have occurred in British society, the machinery of Government, and the British education system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby, Eric and Andersen, Mary (1974). Portrait of Haldane, London: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • AUT (September 1982). “Not the UGC,” AUT Bulletin No. 101, p. 7.

  • AUT (March 1983). Submission to the Select Committee on Education, Science and Arts, AUT.

  • Berdahl, R. O. (1959). British Universities and the State. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. O. (1963). “University-state relations reexamined,” Sociological Review, Monograph No. 7, University of Keele.

  • Berdahl, R. O. (1972). “The Changing Role of the University Grants Committee in Britain,” Lancaster Higher Education Conference.

  • Berdahl, R. O. (1983). “Coordinating structures: The UGC and US coordinating agencies” in M. L. Shattock (Ed.) The Structure and Governance of Higher Education, SRHE.

  • Boyle, Lord E. (9 May 1978). “Government, Parliament and the Robbins Report,” Address to the Reading Education Society.

  • Boyson, Rhodes (1980). Evidence to the Select Committee on Foreign Affairs, published in Third Report of the Foreign Affairs Committee Session 1979–80, H.C. 553, Q. 393,16 January 1980.

  • Boyson, Rhodes (30 March 1981). “Pruning in pursuit of excellence,” Guardian.

  • Brooke, Henry (14 March 1962). Hansard Vol 655, Cols. 164–166.

  • Crowther-Hunt, Lord (1983). “Policy making and accountability in higher education,” in M. L. Shattock (Ed.) The Structure and Governance of Higher Education, SRHE.

  • Churchill, Sir Winston (19 June 1953). Hansard, Vol. 516, Cols. 95–96.

  • Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (1957). A Note on University Policy 1947–1956. C.V.C.P.

  • Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (1967). Report on the Quinquennium 1962–67. C.V.C.P.

  • Committee on Scientific Manpower (The Barlow Report) (1946). Cmnd. 6824. HMSO.

  • Crosland, Rt. Hon. Antony (26 July 1967). Hansard, Vol. 751, pp. 749–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science (DES) (1970). Student Numbers in Higher Education. Education Planning Paper No. 2, DES.

  • DES (1972). Education: A Framework for Expansion. Cmnd. 5174. HMSO.

  • DES/SED Higher Education into the 1990s. A Discussion Document, DES.

  • DES (1980). Evidence to the Select Committee on Education, Science and Arts, published in Vol. II, page 23, para. 39 of The Funding and Organisation of Courses in Higher Education. Fifth Report, H.C. 787-11

  • Education, Science and Arts Committee (1980). The Funding and Organisation of Courses in Higher Education: Interim Report on Overseas Student Fees Vol. II, Minutes of Evidence, para 39, H.C. 363.

  • Estimates Committee (1965). Grants to Universities, Fifth Report, 1964–5. H.C. 283.

  • Expenditure Committee (1976). Policy Making in the Department of Education and Science, Tenth Report, 1975–6. H.C. 621.

  • Ferns, H. S. (1982). How Much Freedom for Universities? Institute for Economic Affairs.

  • Hetherington, Sir Hector (1954). The British University System 1914–1954. Aberdeen University Studies, No. 133.

  • Hill, Graham (3 June 1983). “Developing individually,” Times Higher Education Supplement, No. 552.

  • Hutchinson, Enc. (1974) “The origins of the UGC,” Minerva.

  • Kogan, M. (1971). The Politics of Education. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M. and Kogan, D. (1983). The Attack on Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labour Party (1982). Education After 18: Expansion with Change. Labour Party.

  • Lindsay, Lord (14 May 1947). Parliamentary Debates (Lords), 5th Series, Vol. 147, Col. 742.

  • Moodie, G. C. (1983). “Buffer, coupling and brake: Reflections on 60 years of the UGC,” Higher Education 12: 331–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. (21 July 1972). “The UGC and the mysterie of the quinquennial cake,” Times Higher Education Supplement.

  • Owen, Tom (1980). “The University Grants Committee,” Oxford Review of Education 6(3): 255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, Tom (1981). “Financing University Education.” Unpublished.

  • Parkes, Sir Edward (1982). Address to the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee, Science in Parliament, Vol. 40, No. 73.

  • Public Accounts Committee (1967). Parliament and Control of University Expenditure, Special Report 1966–67. H.C. 290.

  • Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Engineering Profession (The Finniston Report) (1980). Engineering our Future HMSO Cmnd. 7794.

  • Report of the General Board on the Long-Term Development of the University (1975). “The Universities in a Steady State: The Prospect from Cambridge.” Minerva, XIII(2): 270–296, Summer.

  • Royal Commission on Medical Education, Report(TheToddReport)(1968). HMSO Cmnd. 3569.

  • Shattock, Michael (1983). The Structure and Governance of Higher Education. SRHE.

  • Shattock, Michael and Rigby, Gwynneth (1983). Resource Allocation in British Universities. SRHE.

  • Social Democratic Party (1982). Education and Training. Policy Document No. 7. S.D.P.

  • University Grants Committee (UGC) (1948). University Development from 1935–47.

  • UGC (1957). University Development, Interim Report on the Years 1952 to 1956. Cmnd. 79. HMSO.

  • UGC (13 November 1967). Memorandum of General Guidance.

  • UGC (1968). University Development 1962–67. Cmnd. 532, para. 552.

  • UGC (8 October 1970). Preliminary Memorandum of General Guidance on Quinquennial Planning 1972–77.

  • UGC (15 January 1973). Memorandum of General Guidance.

  • UGC (1974). University Development 1967–72. Cmnd. 5728, para. 181. HMSO.

  • UGC (28 November 1978). Admissions for 1979–80.

  • UGC (1979). Report on Russian and Russian Studies.

  • UGC (18 May 1980). Planning for 1980–81.

  • UGC (24 October 1980). Address by the Chairman of the UGC to the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals.

  • UGC (24 July 1981). Evidence to Select Committee on Education, Science and Arts, H.C. 449-i, Session 1980–81.

  • UGC (23 February 1983). Recurrent grant and student numbers.

  • Wilson, Sir Harold (1974). The Labour Government. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenden, Sir John (1970). “The economic and academic freedom of universities,” Jephcott Lecture, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. Vol. 63, August.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Warwick, CV47, Coventry, AL, UK

    Michael Shattock

  2. Institute for Research in Higher and Adult Education, University of Maryland, 20742, College Park, MD, USA

    Robert Berdahl

Authors
  1. Michael Shattock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Berdahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shattock, M., Berdahl, R. The British University Grants Committee 1919–83: Changing relationships with government and the universities. High Educ 13, 471–499 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128560

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128560

Keywords

Search

Navigation