Skip to main content
Log in

On the relative complexity of active vs. passive visual search

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Here, this author attempts to tie the concept of active perception to attentive processing in general and to the complexity level analysis of visual search described previously; the aspects of active vision as they have been currently described form a subset of the full spectrum of attentional capabilities. Our approach is motivated by the search requirements of vision tasks and thus we cast the problem as one of search preceding the application of methods for shape-from-X, optical flow, etc., and recognition in general. This perspective permits a dimension of analysis not found in current formulations of the active perception problem, that of computational complexity. This article describes where the active perception paradigm does and does not provide computational benefits along this dimension. A formalization of the search component of active perception is presented in order to accomplish this. The link to attentional mechanisms is through the control of data acquisition and processing by the active process. It should be noted that the analysis performed here applies to the general hypothesize-and-test search strategy, to time-varying scenes as well as to the general problem of integration of successive fixations. Finally, an argument is presented as to why this framework is an extension of the behaviorist approaches to active vision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, A., and Ahuja, N. 1988. Surface reconstruction by dynamic integration of focus, camera vergence and stereo. Proc. 2nd Intern. Conf. Comput, Vision, December, Tarpon Springs FL, pp. 532–543.

  • Aloimonos, J., Weiss, I., and Bandyopadhyay, A. 1987. Active vision, Proc. Ist Intern. Conf. Comput. Vision, London, pp. 35–54.

  • Bajcsy, R. 1985. Active perception vs. passive perception. Proc. IEEE Workshop on Computer Vision: Representation and Control, October, Bellaire MI, pp. 55–62.

  • Ballard, D. 1985. Task frames in visuo-motor coordination. Proc. IEEE Workshop on Computer Vision: Representation and Control, October, Bellaire MI, pp. 3–10.

  • Ballard, D. 1987. Eye movements and visual cognition. Proc. IEEE Workshop Spatial Reasoning and Multi-sensor Fusion, St. Charles IL, October, pp. 188–200.

  • Ballard, D. 1989. Animate vision. Proc. 11th Intern. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell., Detroit

  • Ballard, D., and Ozcandarli, A. 1988. Eye fixation and early vision: Kinetic depth. Proc. 2nd Intern. Conf. Comput. Vision, Tarpon Springs, FL, pp. 524–531.

  • Bandyopadhyay, A., Chandra, B., and Ballard, D. 1986. Active navigation: Tracking an environmental point considered beneficial. Proc. IEEE Workshop on Motion: Representation and Analysis, Charleston, SC, May, pp. 23–28.

  • BrooksR. 1986. A layered intelligent control system for a mobile robot. IEEE J. Robot. Autom. RA-2: 14–23, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.J., and Ferrier, N. 1988. Modal control of an attentive vision system. Proc. 2nd Intern. Conf. Comput. Vision, December, Tarpon Springs, FL, pp. 514–523.

  • Connell, J. 1989. “A Colony Architecture for an Artificial Creature.” MIT AI Lab, Ph.D. Thesis, AI-TR1151.

  • Freuder, E. 1976. “A Computer System for Visual Recognition Using Active Knowledge.” Ph.D. thesis; also AI-TR-345, MIT AI Lab, June.

  • GareyM., and JohnsonD. 1979. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • GibsonJ.J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimson, E. 1988. The combinatorics of object recognition in cluttered environments using constrained search. Proc. 2nd Intern. Conf. Comput. Vision, Tampa, FL, pp. 218–227.

  • HelmholtzH.von, 1910. Hanbuch der physiologischen detlk. English translation, J. Southall, Dover: New York, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • KrotkovE. 1987. Focusing, Intern. J. Comput. Vision 1: 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBergeD. 1990. Attention. Psychological Science 1–3, 156–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeeperR. 1935. A study of a neglected portion of the field of learning: The development of sensory organization. J. Genet. Psychol. 46: 41–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • MarrD. 1982. Vision. W.H. Freeman: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MetzgerW. 1974. Consciousness, Perception and Action. Handbook of Perception, vol. 1, Historical and Philosophical Roots of Perception. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • NakayamaK., and MackebenM. 1989. Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research 29(11): 1631–1647.

    Google Scholar 

  • ParasuramanR., and DaviesD., (editors). 1984. Varieties of Attention. Academic Press: Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R., Bajcsy, R., et al. 1987. The integration of sensing with actuation to form a robust intelligent control system. GRASP LAB 97, Dept. of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, March.

  • RabbittP. 1978. Sorting, categorization and visual search. In The Handbook of Perception: Perceptual Processing, Vol.IX, edited by E.Carterette and M.Freidman. Academic Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • SteinmanR. 1986. Eye movement. Vision Research 26(9):1389–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  • TreismanA. 1988. Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 40A(2):201/237.

    Google Scholar 

  • TsotsosJ.K. 1988. A ‘complexity level’ analysis of immediate vision. Intern. J. Comp. Vision 1(4):303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsotsos, J.K. 1989. The complexity of perceptual search tasks. Proc Ilth Intern. Conf. Artif. Intell., pp. 1571–1577, Detroit.

  • TsotsosJ.K. 1990a. A complexity level analysis of vision. Behav. Brain Sci. 13(3):423–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • TsotsosJ.K. 1990b. A little complexity analysis goes a long way. Behav. Brain Sci. 13(3):459–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • TsotsosJ.K. 1991. Is complexity analysis appropriate for analyzing biological systems? Behav. Brain Sci. 14(4):770–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • UhrL. 1990. Some important constraints on complexity. Behav. Brain Sci. 13(3):455–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • VervilleE., and CameronN. 1946. Age and sex differences in the perception of incomplete pictures in adults. Pedagogical Seminary 68:149–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsotsos, J.K. On the relative complexity of active vs. passive visual search. Int J Comput Vision 7, 127–141 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128132

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128132

Keywords

Navigation