Skip to main content
Log in

Group graphs and computational symmetry on massively parallel architecture

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efficient space and time exploitation of symmetry in domains on highly parallel, distributed-memory architecture is, in certain cases, equivalent to routing along a labeled group action graph, with computation associated with each group element label, where the group of symmetries acts on the processors. The algebraic structure of the group can sometimes be analyzed to determine, a priori, space and time efficient routing schedules on the hardware network (which, in practice, is often another group action graph). The algorithms we develop were implemented on a 64K-processor CM-2 and used to solve certain natural classes of chess endgames, part of whose search space is invariant under a noncommutative crystallographic group. This program runs 400 times faster than any previous implementation, and discovered many interesting new results in the area; some of these results are not solvable in practice with current serial techniques because the time and space requirements are too large. It seems interesting that it was possible, albeit with difficulty, to implement efficiently certain irregular chess rules on the CM-2, which is optimized for regular data sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annexstein, F., Baumslag, M., and Rosenberg, A.L. 1987. Group action graphs and parallel architectures. COINS Tech. Rept. 87-133, Univ. of Mass.

  • Hillis, D., and Taylor, W. 1990. Exploiting symmetry in high-dimensional finite-difference calculations. J. Parallel and Distributed Computing, 8, 1 (Jan.), 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson, S.L. 1987. Communication efficient basic linear algebra computations on hypercube architectures. J. Parallel and Distributed Computing, 4, 2 (Apr.), 133–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massalin, H. 1987. Superoptimizer—A look at the smallest program. In Proc., Second Internat. Conf. on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (Palo Alto, Calif., Oct. 5–8), IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, pp. 122–126.

  • Michie, D., and Bratko, I. 1987. Ideas on knowledge synthesis stemming from the KBBKN endgame. Internat. Comp. Chess Assoc. J., 10, 1 (Mar.), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, E.H. 1966. Algebraic Topology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiller, L. 1988. Massively parallel retrograde endgame analysis. Tech. Rept. BU-CS TR88-014, Boston Univ., Comp. Sci. Dept.

  • Stiller, L. 1989. Parallel analysis of certain endgames. Internat. Comp. Chess Assoc. J., 12, 2 (June), 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thinking Machines. 1990. Connection Machine Model CM-2 Technical Summary. Thinking Machines Corp., Cambridge, Mass.

  • Thompson, K. 1986. Retrograde analysis of certain endgames. Internat. Comp. Chess Assoc. J., 9, 3 (Sept.), 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Herik, H.J., and Herschberg, I.S. 1985. The construction of an omniscient endgame database. Internat. Comp. Chess Assoc. J., 8, 2 (June), 66–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A.T. 1984. Graphs, Groups, and Surfaces. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Partially supported by NSF/DARPA Grant CCR-8908092.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stiller, L. Group graphs and computational symmetry on massively parallel architecture. J Supercomput 5, 99–117 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127839

Keywords

Navigation