Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investor efficiency in the face of takings

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Governmental entities at all levels are empowered to acquire private property for the public's benefit, provided that “just compensation” is paid. The level of compensation typically viewed by courts as “just” is market value, but questions arise as to whether market value compensation motivates the private owner of land, potentially subject to a taking, to improve the property to a degree that is socially efficient. Earlier works have found market value to be a compensation level too high to promote efficiency. The present paper offers an analysis, based on a simple model of investor profit maximization, that provides a unified view of models presented in some important earlier works. In a special application of the general case, it is shown that market value can be too low a level of compensation to promote efficient behavior by the land owner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian, A., and H. Demsetz. “The Property Rights Paradigm.” Journal of Economic History 33 (March 1973): 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L., and D.L. Rubinfeld. “Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis.” California Law Review 72 (July 1984): 569–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L., D.L. Rubinfeld, and P. Shapiro. “The Taking of Land: When Should Compensation Be Paid?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99 (February 1984): 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callies, D.L., and R.H. Freilich. Cases and Materials on Land Use. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, P.F. “Privatization of Assessment, Zoning, and Eminent Domain.” ORER Letter 4 (Spring 1990), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R., and T. Ulen. “The Public Use of Private Property.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois, 1992.

  • Cunningham, R.A. “Inverse Condemnation as a Remedy for ‘Regulatory Takings.’” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 8 (Spring 1981): 517–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, D.A. “Economic Analysis and Just Compensation.” International Review of Law and Economics 12 (June 1992): 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, W.A. “The Offer/Ask Disparity and Just Compensation for Takings.” Unpublished working paper, Dartmouth College, 1993.

  • Fischel, W.A., and P. Shapiro. “Takings, Insurance, and Michelman: Comments on Economic Interpretations of ‘Just Compensation’ Law.” Journal of Legal Studies 27 (June 1988): 269–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, W.A., and P. Shapiro. “A Constitutional Choice Model of Compensation for Takings.” International Review of Law and Economics 9 (December 1989): 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.” Executive Order 12630 of March 15, 1988. Federal Register 53 (March 18, 1988): 8859–8862.

  • Kanner, G. “Condemnation Blight: Just How Just Is Just Compensation?” Notre Dame Lawyer 48 (April 1973): 765–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch, J.L., and T.E. Borcherding. “Expropriation of Private Property and the Basis for Compensation.” University of Toronto Law Journal 29 (Summer 1979): 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelker, D.R. “Land Use Takings: The Compensation Issue.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 8 (Spring 1981): 491–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, T.J. “Compensation for the Taking of Land Under Eminent Domain.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 147 (June 1991): 354–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelman, F.J. “Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of ‘Just Compensation’ Law.” Harvard Law Review 80 (April 1967): 1165–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munneke, H.J. “Eminent Domain: Lessons from the Past.” ORER Letter 5 (Spring 1991): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munzer, S.R. A Theory of Property. New York: Cambridge University Press (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollot, M.L. Grand Theft and Petit Larceny: Property Rights in America. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, J.L. “Takings, Private Property and Public Rights.” The Yale Law Journal 81 (December 1971): 149–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B.H., Jr. “A Comment on Economic Analysis and Just Compensation.” International Review of Law and Economics 12 (June 1992): 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, R.D. “A Comment on Economic Analysis and Just Compensation.” International Review of Law and Economics 12 (June 1992): 139–140.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Finance, Insurance, and Law, Illinois State University, 328 Williams Hall, 61761, Normal, IL, USA

    Joseph W. Trefzger

  2. Department of Finance, University of Illinois, 304 David Kinley Hall, 61801, Urbana, IL, USA

    Peter F. Colwell

Authors
  1. Joseph W. Trefzger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter F. Colwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trefzger, J.W., Colwell, P.F. Investor efficiency in the face of takings. J Real Estate Finan Econ 12, 23–35 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127764

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127764

Key Words

Search

Navigation