Skip to main content
Log in

Louis Agassiz (1807–1873) and the reality of natural groups

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The philosophy of “pattern cladism” has been variously explained by reference to the work of Louis Agassiz. The present study analyzes Agassiz's attempt to combine an empirical approach to the study of nature with an idealistic philosophy. From this emerges the problem of empiricism and of the isomorphy between the order of nature and human thinking. The analysis of the writings of Louis Agassiz serves as the basis for discussion of the “reality” of natural groups as postulated by pattern cladists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agassiz, L.: 1833–1843, Recherches sur les Poissons fossiles, Petitpierre, Neuchätel, Vol. 1.

  • Agassiz, L.: 1841, De la Succession et du Développement des Etres Organisés à la Surface du Globe Terrestre dans les Différens Ages de la Nature, Imprimerie Wolfrath, Neuchatel.

  • Agassiz, L.: 1844, Monographie des Poissons Fossiles du Vieux Grès Rouge ou Système Dévonien (Old Red Sandstone) de lles Britanniques et de Russie, Jent et Gassmann, Soleure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassiz, L.: 1845, Iconographie des Coquilles Réputées identiques avec les Espèces Vivantes ou dans Différens Terrains de l'Epoque Tertiaire, Accompagnée de la Description des Espèces Nouvelles, Imprimerie Wolfrath, Neuchatel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassiz, L.: 1859, An Essay on Classification, Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans and Roberts, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassiz, L.: 1874 [1973], ‘Evolution and the Permanence of Type’, in D. L. Hull (ed.), Darwin and his Critics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 430–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiton, E. J.: 1985, Leibniz. A Biography, Adam Hilger Ltd., Bristol and Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberch, P.: 1985, ‘Problems with the Interpretation of Developmental Sequences’, Systematic Zoology 34: 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1982, ‘Classes and Cladists’, Systematic Zoology 31: 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, R. H.: 1982, ‘Theoretical Issues and “Pattern Cladistics”’, Systematic Zoology 31: 286–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, R. H.: 1983, ‘Parsimony, hierarchy, and biological implications’, in Platnick, N. and V. A. Funk (eds.), Advances in Cladistics, Vol. 2, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, R. H.: 1985, ‘On the Independence of Systematics’, Cladistics 1: 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. H.: 1985, ‘Modes of subsistence and folk biological taxonomy’, Current Anthropology 26: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daudin, H.: 1926, Cuvier et Lamarck. Les Classes Zoologiques et l'ldée de Série Animale (1790–1830), Félix Alcan, Paris, Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • deQueiroz, K.: 1985, ‘The Ontogenetic Method for Determining Character Polarity and its Relevance to Phylogenetic Systematics’, Systematic Zoology 34: 280–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N.: 1985, Unfinished Synthesis. Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and S. J. Gould: 1972, ‘Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism’, in T. J. M. Schopf, Models in Paleobiology, Freeman, Cooper & Co., San Francisco, pp. 82–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, W. L.: 1982, ‘The Conceptual Relationship between Ontogeny and Phylogeny’, Paleobiology 8: 254–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forey, P.: 1985, ‘(Review of) W. Arthur. Mechanisms of Morphological Evolution’, Cladistics 1: 396–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, E. S.: 1979, ‘An Introduction to the Logic of Phylogeny Reconstruction’, in J. Cracraft and N. Eldredge, Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 79–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.: 1974, ‘A Radical Solution to the Species Problem’, Systematic Zoology 24: 536–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J.: 1977, Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W.: 1967, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1976, ‘Are Species really Individuals?’, Systematic Zoology 25: 174–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. J. and D. M. Lambert: 1984, ‘Functionalism, Structuralism, and “Ways of Seeing”’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 111: 787–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A. G.: 1985, ‘Ontogeny and Phylogenetic Systematics’, Cladistics 1: 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn-Schnyder, E.: 1973, ‘Louis Agassiz als Paläontologe’, Denkschriften der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 89: 21–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, E.: 1960, Louis Agassiz. A Life in Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løvtrup, S.: 1977, The Phylogeny of Vertebrata, John Wiley & Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løvtrup, S.: 1978, ‘On von Baerian and Haeckelian Recapitualtion’, Systematic Zoology 27: 348–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löw, R.: 1983, ‘Evolution und Erkenntnis — Tragweite und Grenzen der evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie in philosophischer Absicht’, in K. Lorenz and F. M. Wuketits (eds.), Die Evolution des Denkens, Piper, München, pp. 331–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcou, J.: 1896, Life, Letters and Works of Louis Agassiz, MacMillan, New York, Vols. 1 and 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1969, Principles of Systematic Zoology, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, The Belknap Press at Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G.: 1978, ‘Ontogeny, Phylogeny, Paleontology, and the Biogenetic Law’, Systematic Zoology 27: 324–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. and N. Platnick: 1981, Systematics and Biogeography. Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. and N. Platnick: 1984, ‘Systematics and evolution’, in M.-W. Ho and P. T. Saunders (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Academic Press, London and New York, pp. 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C.: 1977, ‘The Contribution of Paleontology to Teleostean Phylogeny’, in M. K. Hecht, P. C. Goody and B. R. Hecht (eds.), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution, Plenum, New York, p. 579–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C.: 1981a, ‘Agassiz, Darwin, Huxley, and the Fossil Record of Teleost Fishes’, Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology 35: 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C.: 1981b, ‘Significance of Fossils in Determining Evolutionary Relationships’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 195–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C.: 1982a, ‘Classes and Cladists or Individuals and Evolution’, Systematic Zoology 31: 284–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C.: 1982b, ‘Morphological Characters and Homology’, in K. A. Joysey and A. E. Friday (eds.), Problems in Phylogenetic Reconstructuion, Academic Press, London and New York, pp. 21–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platnick, N. I.: 1982, ‘Defining Characters and Evolutionary Groups’, Systematic Zoology 31: 282–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R.: 1975, Die Ordnung des Lebendigen. Systembedingungen der Evolution, Paul Parey, Hamburg und Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R.: 1983, ‘The Role of Morphology in the Theory of Evolution’, in M. Grene (ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 205–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R.: 1985, Die Spaltung des Weltbildes. Biologische Grundlagen des Erklärens und Verstehens, Paul Parey, Hamburg und Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R.: 1986, Begriff und Welt. Biologische Grundlagen des Erkennens und Beerifens, Paul Parey, Hamburg und Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M.: 1986, Evolution and Classification, Longman, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel, O.: 1979, ‘Ontogeny and the recognition of primitive character states’, Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 17: 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel, O.: 1983, Kladismus oder die Legende vom Stammbaum, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel, O.: 1984, ‘Atomism, Transformism, and the Fossil Record’, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel, O.: 1985, ‘Ontogeny and the Hierarchy of Types’, Cladistics 1: 234–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D. E., P. L. Forey, B. Gardiner, and C. Patterson: 1981, ‘Lungfishes, Tetrapods, Paleontology, and Plesiomorphy’, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 167: 159–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubin, N. H. and P. Alberch: 1986, ‘A Morphogenetic Approach to the Origin and Basic Organization of the Tetrapod Limb’, in M. K. Hecht, Wallace. B. and G. T. Prance (eds.), Evolutionary Biology 20, Plenum, New York, pp. 319–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G.: 1961, Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Baer, K. E.: 1866, ‘Über den Zweck in den Vorgängen der Natur’, in K. E. von Baer (ed.), Reden gehalten in Wissenschaftlichen Versammlungen und kleine Aufsätze vermischten Inhalts, 2. Theil, Friedrich Vieweg, Braunschweig, pp. 51–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watrous, L. E. and Q. D. Wheeler: 1981, ‘The Out-Group Comparison Method of Character Analysis’, Systematic Zoology 30: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsor, M. P.: 1979, ‘Louis Agassiz and the Species Question’, Studies in the History of Biology 3: 89–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O.: 1981, Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, Wiley, Chichester and New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rieppel, O. Louis Agassiz (1807–1873) and the reality of natural groups. Biol Philos 3, 29–47 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127627

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127627

Key words

Navigation