Skip to main content
Log in

Approaches, assaults, attractions, affairs: Policy implications of the sexualization of the workplace

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is an analysis of the relationship between, on the one hand, empirical findings and theoretical perspectives on the sexualization of the workplace and, on the other, changes in public policy intended to prevent and eliminate sexual harassment as a problem for employed women. The sexualization on the workplace is conceptualized as all consensual and coerced sexual interactions at work, that is, both sexual harassment and sexual relationships. A summary of the evidence regarding both types of behaviors reveals that sexual harassment is experienced quite often by women workers; occasionally, women engage in sexual relationships with persons met at work. Harassment has significant negative consequences for the economic, emotional and physical condition of women, delimiting further an economic position for women which has already been affected severely by occupational segregation and employment discrimination. In assessing the impact of guidelines of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission defining sexual harassment as sexual discrimination, issues are raised concerning the use and effectiveness of the guidelines by women workers, courts, and employers. It is argued that public policy on harassment is necessary and progressive but limited in its impact; the bulk of the problem, especially with regard to co-worker behavior, and the structural context of inequality are left relatively untouched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, J. (1980). “Women and stratification: a review of recent literature,” Contemporary Sociology 9: 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alliance Against Sexual Coercion (1979). “Men who harass,” Cambridge, Massachusetts: Alliance Against Sexual Coercion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alliance Against Sexual Coercion (1981). “Organizing against sexual harassment,” Radical America 15: 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, R.D. and G.M. Norris (1976). “Sexual divisions and the dual labor market,” in D. Barker and S. Allen (eds.), Dependence and Exploitation in Work and Marriage. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beechey, V. (1977). “Some notes on female wage labour in capitalist production,” Capital and Class 3: 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, D. and G.E. Thomson (1982). “Sexual harassment on a university campus: the confluence of authority relations, sexual interest, and gender stratification,” Social Problems 29: 236–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1981). “The good-provider role: its rise and fall,” American Psychologist 36: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Globe (1981). “Senate looks at harassment on job,” April 22: 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, D.I., A.G. Sargent, and M.S. Sprague (1975). “The executive man and woman: the issue of sexuality,” in F. Gordon and M. Strober (eds.), Bringing Women Into Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, C. (1976). “Rape at work,” in M. Walker and S. Brodsky (eds.), Sexual Assault: The Victim and the Rapist. Lexington, Massachusetts: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulzarik, M. (1978). “Sexual harassment at the workplace: historical notes,” Radical America 12: 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J.R. (1978). “The economics of women's victimization,” in J.R. Chapman and M. Gates (eds.), The Victimization of Women. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavkin, W. (1984). Double Exposure: Women's Health Hazards on the Job and at Home. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, E.G.C. and T. Blodgett (1981). “Sexual harassment: some see it, some won't.” Harvard Business Review, 59: 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, P. (1983). “An analysis of university definitions of sexual harassment,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 8: 696–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crull, P. (1982). “The stress effects of sexual harassment on the job: implications for counseling,” American Journal of Othropsychiatry 52: 539–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crull, P. (1984). “Sexual harassment and women's health,” in W. Chavkin (ed.), Double Exposure: Women's Health Hazards on the Job and at Home. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMoro, D. (1984). “Sexual harassment, hegemony, and labor process control,” unpublished MA thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (1979). Contested Terrain. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Z. (1981). The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1980). “Discrimination because of sex under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended: adoption of interim interpretive guidelines,” Federal Register 29: 1604. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, L. (1978). Sexual Shakedown: The Sexual Harassment of Women on the Job. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M.R. and A. Levenstein (1982). “Sex and romance in the office,” Wall Street Journal (November 29).

  • Freeman, J. (1982). “Women and public policy: an overview,” in E. Boneparth (ed.), Women, Power and Policy. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, J. and M.L. Palley (1982). Women and Public Policies. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. (1982). “Why men resist,” in B. Thorne and M. Yalom (eds.), Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. (1981). “The politics of sexual harassment,” Radical America 15: 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J.E. and L. Bjorn (1983). “Blue collar blues: the sexual harassment of women autoworkers,” Work and Occupations 9: 271–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. and B. Morash (1982). “Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment,” Journal of Social Issues 38: 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. (1979). “Capitalism, patriarchy, and job segregation by sex,” in Z. Eisenstein (ed.), Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N.C.M. (1983). Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Law Review (1984). “Sexual harassment claims of abusive work environment under Title VII,” 97: 1449–1467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, A.R. and J. Backman (1982). Sex Role Attitudes among High School Seniors. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.F., Jr. and c.K. Behrens (1981). “Love in the office: a guide for dealing with sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,” DePaul Law Review 30: 581–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, I. and B. Gutek (1982). “Attributions and assignment of responsibility for sexual harassment,” Journal of Social Issues 38: 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korda, M. (1972). “Sex and sexism,” in M. Korda (ed.), Male Chauvinism: How It Works. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman-Blumen, J. and Tickamyer (1975). “Sex roles in transition: a ten-year perspective,” in A. Inkeles (ed.), Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 1. Palo Alto, California: Annual Reviews, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J. (1982). “Responses to sexual harassment on the job: legal, organizational and individual actions,” Journal of Social Issue 38: 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machung, A. (1984). “Word processing: forward for business, backward for women,” in K. Sacks and D. Remy (eds.), My Troubles Are Going To Have Trouble with Me: Everyday Trials and Triumphs of Women Workers. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. (1979). Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (1980). Breaking and Entering: Policewomen on Patrol. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1980). October 24: A20.

  • Pinkstaff, M. and A.B. Wilkinson (1979). Women at Work: Overcoming the Obstacles. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R.E. (1977). “Coping with cupid: the formation, impact, and management of romantic relationships in organizations,” Administrative Science Quaterly 22: 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasnic, C.D. (1982). “The evolvement of an action for sexual harassment under Title VII,” St. Louis Law Journal 26: 875–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L.W. (1981). The Dynamics of Sex and Gender. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemer, J. (1979). Hard Hats. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, V.M. (1977). “Rape as a social problem: a by-product of the feminist movement,” Social Problems 25: 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, C. (1975). “The traffic in women: notes on the ‘political economy’ of sex,” in R. Reiter (ed.), Towards An Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, L. (1976). Worlds of Pain: Life in the Working-Class Family. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran, C. (1976). “What men do to women on the job: a shocking look at sexual harassment,” Redbook (November): 149.

  • Schneider, B.E. (1982). “Consciousness about sexual harassment among heterosexual and lesbian women workers,” Journal of Social Issues 38: 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B.E. (1984a). “Put up and shut up: sexual assaults at the workplace,” unpublished manuscript.

  • Schneider, B.E. (1984b). “The office affair: myth and reality for heterosexual and lesbian women workers,” Sociological Perspectives 27: 443–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B.E. (1984c). “Graduate women and the contradictions of the academy: sexual harassment and university policy,” unpublished manuscript.

  • Schur, E.M. (1984). Labeling Women Deviant: Gender, Stigma, and Social Control. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, A.K. (1980). “Sex and power: sexual bases of radical feminism,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 5: 590–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1976). “Sexual harassment: working women's dilemma,” Quest: A Feminist Quarterly 10: 346–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. (1981). “Law and the control of women's sexuality: the case of the 1950's,” in B. Hutter and G. Williams (eds.), Controlling Women: The Normal and the Deviant. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snitow, A., C. Stansell and S. Thompson (1983). Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S.J., C.M. Bonjean, W.T. Markham, and J. Corder (1982). “Social structure and intergroup interaction,” American Sociological Review 47: 587–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangri, S., M. Burt, and L.B. Johnson (1982). “Sexual harassment at work: three explanatory models,” Journal of Social Issues 38: 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Merit Systems Protection Board (1981). Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Is It a Problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C. (1984). Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. Boston, Massachusetts: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkowitz, J. (1980). “The politics of prostitution,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 6: 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshok, M. (1981). Blue Collar Women: Pioneers on the Male Frontier. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber-Burdin, E. and P. Rossi (1982). “Defining sexual harassment on campus: a replication and extension,” Journal of Social Issues 38: 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, W. and N. Fligstein (1979). “Sex and authority in the workplace,” American Sociological Review 44: 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

Cases Cited

  • Bundy v. Jackson (1977). Federal Reporter Second Series 641: 934–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson v. City of Dundee (1982). Federal Reporter Second Series 682: 897–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz v. Dole (1983). Federal Reporter Second Series 709: 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller v. Bank of America (1976). Federal Supplement 418: 233–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller v. Bank of America (1979). Federal Reporter Second Series 600: 211–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins v. Public Service Electric and Gas Company (1977). Federal Reporter Second Series 568: 1044–1049.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, B.E. Approaches, assaults, attractions, affairs: Policy implications of the sexualization of the workplace. Popul Res Policy Rev 4, 93–113 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127546

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127546

Keywords

Navigation