This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Ausubel, D.P. (1973). The nature of educational research. In H.S.Broudy, R.H.Ennis, & L.I.Krimerman (Eds.), Philosophy of educational research. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 79–88.
Bacharach, S.B., Conley, S., & Shedd, J. (1986). Beyond career ladders: Structuring teacher carrer development systems. Teachers College Record, 87 (4), 563–574.
Bell, T.H. (1984). The master teacher. School Business Affairs, 50 (7), 41–43.
Brickell, E.E. (1984). Our career program combines merit pay and master teacher plans. The American School Board Journal, 171 (2), 31, 40.
Connors, J. (1969). Building a career ladder. American Education, 5 (2), 15–17.
Cooper, J.M. (1972). Differentiated staffing: Some questions and answers. National Elementary Principal, 51, (4), 49–54.
Cronbach, L.J. (1973). Disciplined inquiry. In H.S.Broudy, R.H.Ennis & L.I.Krimerman (Eds.), Philosophy of educational research. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 6–16.
Edelfelt, R.A. (1972). Differentiated staffing: Where are we? National Elementary Principal, 51 (4), 46–48.
Freiberg, H.J. (1985). Master teacher programs: Lesson from the past. Educational Leadership, 42, 16–21.
Hansen, J.M. (1985). Career ladders: Working smarter, working better. NASSP Bulletin, 69, 116–117.
Hart, A.W., & Murphy, M.J. (1986). Career ladders and performance appraisal. National Forum, 66(2), 23–26.
Incentive programs for teachers and administrators: How are they doing? (1986, December). Career Ladder Clearinghouse Report.
Kerr, D.H. (1983). Teaching competence and teacher education in the United States. Teachers College Record, 84(3), 525–552.
Malen, B., & Murphy, M.J. (1985). A statewide decentralized approach to public school reform: The case of career ladders in Utah. Journal of Education Finance, 11, 261–277.
McNeely, R.L. (1984). Master teachers as master workers. Social Policy, 14(3), 57–60.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
National Science Commission on Precollege Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology. (1983). Educating Americans in the 21st century: A plan of action for improving mathematics, science, and technology education for all American elementary and secondary students so that their achievement is the best in the world by 1995. A report to the American people and the National Science Board. Washington, D.C.: National Science Board, National Science Foundation.
Parker, J.C. (1985). Career ladder/master teacher programs: Implications for principals. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Rosenholtz, S.J. (1986). Career ladders and merit pay: Capricious fads or fundamental reforms? The Elementary School Journal, 86(4), 513–529.
Rosenholtz, S.J., & Smylie, M.A. (1984). Teacher compensation and career ladders. The Elementary School Journal, 85(2), 149–166.
Schechty, P.C., Joslin, A.W., Leak, S.E., & Hansen, R.C. (1985). The Charlotte-Mecklenburg teacher career development program. Educational Leadership, 42, 4–8.
Shulman, L.S. (1984). The practical and the eclectic: A deliberation on teaching and educational research. Curriculum Inquiry, 14(2), 183–200.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M.C.Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., pp. 3–36.
Washburn, J.M. (1986). Sow grants among expert teachers, and your schools will reap the benefits. The American School Board Journal, 173(5), 44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clarridge, P.B. A research design perspective for career ladder plans. J Pers Eval Educ 2, 261–270 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127460
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127460