Skip to main content
Log in

The estimation of secondary production in a natural population of Daphnia hyalina (Leydig) using alternative methods of computation

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A single set of population data for Daphnia hyalina was used to estimate production using four methods on a daily and annual basis. Estimates varied from 12.94 to 50.60 g dry weight m-2 y-1. The differences obtained are attributed to faults in the method such as the ignoring of post embryonic development times and poor estimates of basic variables used for the calculations. The latter include poor estimations of specific parts of the population census, particularly egg estimates, and choice of values used for weight estimates and duration times of stages. The normally used birth rate model probably underestimates production whereas the growth increment method probably overestimates production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew, T. E., 1977. Some Aspects of the Ecology of Zooplankton in Thames Valley Storage Reservoirs, with special reference to daphnids. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 296 pp.

  • Bevington, P. R., 1969. Data Reduction and Error Analysis in the Physical Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottrell, H. H., 1975. The relationship between temperature and duration of development in some epiphytic Cladocera and Copepoda from the River Thames, Reading, with a discussion of temperature functions. Oecologia 18: 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottrell, H. H., Duncan, A., Gliwicz, Z. M., Grygierek, E., Hillbricht-Ilkowska, A., Kurasawa, H., Larsson, P. & Weglenska, T., 1976. A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Norw. J. Zool. 24: 419–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., Costa, R. R., Rowe, R. E., Moshiri, G. A., Scanlon, R. M. & Zajdel, R. K., 1969. Ecological energetics of a natural population of the predaceous zooplankter Leptodora kindtii Focke (Cladocera). Oikos 20: 189–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, R. M., Shugart, H. H., Hildebrand, S. G. & Elwood, J. W., 1978. The effect of growth curve and sampling regime on instantaneous-growth, removal-summation, and Hynes/Hamilton estimates of aquatic insect production: A computer simulation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23: 184–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, A., Cremer, G. A. & Andrew, T., 1970. The measurement of respiratory rates under field and laboratory conditions during an ecological study of zooplankton. Polsk. Arch. Hydrobiol. 17: 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, A., 1975. The importance of zooplankton in the ecology of reservoirs. Proc. of a Water Research Centre Symposium. The effects of storage on water quality. 247–272, Reading, March 1975, The Centre, Medmenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, W. T., 1960. Reproductive rates of rotifers in natural populations. Mem. Ist. ital. Idrobiol. 12: 21–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, W. T., 1974. Secondary production. Mitt. int. Ver. Limnol. 20: 229–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, W. T. & Winberg, G. G., 1971. A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary productivity in freshwaters. IBP Handbook No. 17, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons, A. G. & Andrew, T. E. (in press). The zooplankton of Lough Neagh, 1968 to 1978; the seasonal succession of the zooplankton species. In R. B. Wood & R. V. Smith (Eds). The Limnology of Lough Neagh. Junk, The Hague.

  • Galkovskaya, G. A., 1968. Production of plankton rotifers. In: Methods of Assessment of Production of Aquatic Animals. Ed. G. G. Winberg, pp. 135–41. Minsk: Vysheishaya Shkova. (In Russian). Reported in Morgan (1980).

  • Geller, W., 1975. Food ingestion of Daphnia pulex as a function of food concentration, temperature, animal's body length and hunger. Arch. Hydrobiol. 2: 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, D. G., 1981. Zooplankton patchiness. Freshwater Biological Association Annual Report, 32–44.

  • George, D. G. & Edwards, R. W., 1974. Population dynamics and production of Daphnia hyalina in a eutrophic reservoir. Freshwat. Biol. 4: 445–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., 1956. Growth, size and reproduction in Daphnia (Crustacea Cladocera). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 126: 173–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. J., 1964. The dynamics of a natural population of Daphnia. Ver. int. Ver. Limnol. 15: 660–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, A., Anderson, R. S. & Mayhood, D. W., 1980. Production and population dynamics of Leptodiaptomus sicilis in a mountain lake in Alberta, Canada. Holarct. Ecol. 3: 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. R., Lack, T. J. & Jones, C. S., 1979. Population dynamics and production of Daphnia hyalina var. lacustris in Farmoor I, a shallow eutrophic reservoir. J. Plankton Res. 1: 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, W., 1977. Studies on the carbon balance of Daphnia pulex de Geer as related to environmental conditions. II. The dependence of carbon assimilation on animal size, temperature, food concentration and diet of species. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 48: 310–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLaren, I. A., 1964. Effects of temperature on growth of zooplankton and the adaptive value of vertical migration. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 20: 685–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N. C., 1980. Secondary production. In E. D. LeCren & R. H. Lowe-McConnell eds, IBP 22, The Functioning of Freshwater Ecosystems. Cambridge.

  • Munro, I. G. & White, R. W. G., 1975. Comparison of the influence of temperature on the egg development and growth of Daphnia longispina O. F. Muller (Crustacea Cladocera) from two habitats in Southern England. Oecologia 20: 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patalas, K., 1954. Porownawcze badania nad nowym typem somoczynnego czerpacza planktonowego i hydrochemicznego. (Comparative studies on a new type of self-acting water sampler for plankton and hydrochemical investigations.) Ecol. pol. A, 2: 231–242 (English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman, S., 1958. The transformation of energy by Daphnia pulex. Ecol. Monogr. 28: 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, J. E., 1964. Thermal stratification and thermocline control in storage reservoirs. Proc. Soc. Wat. Treatm. Exam. 13: 275–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, J. A. P., Duncan, A. & Andrew, T. E., 1972. The daily carbon gains and losses in the seston of Queen Mary Reservoir, England, during mid-1968. In Proc. IBP-UNESCO Symp. Productivity problems of freshwaters. Kazimierz Dolny, May 1970. Polish Scientific Publishers, Warszawa-Krakow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straskraba, M., 1967. Estimation of respiration in the field of natural populations of Cladocera and Copepoda using the quantitative method of plankton sorting. Arch. Hydrobiol. 63: 497–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stross, R. G., Neess, J. C. & Hasler, A. D., 1961. Turnover time and production of the planktonic Crustacea in limed and reference portions of a bog lake. Ecology 42: 237–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T. F., 1977. Secondary production in inland waters. Adv. Ecol. Res. 10: 91–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. C., 1965. The population dynamics and production of Daphnia in Canyon Ferry Reservoir, Montana. Limnol. Oceanogr. 10: 583–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle-Taylor, E., 1967. Forty-first report on the results of the bacteriological, chemical and biological examination of the London Waters for the years 1965–66. Metropolitan Water Board, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrew, T.E. The estimation of secondary production in a natural population of Daphnia hyalina (Leydig) using alternative methods of computation. Hydrobiologia 107, 3–18 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126698

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126698

Keywords

Navigation