Abstract
While prediction is a necesary requirement for the acceptance of a scientific theory, the prediction and control of behavior is not a neutral criterion for evaluating psychological theories. Appeal to prediction and control of behavior as a criterion, or objective of psychological theory is intelligible only if Skinner's conception of man is accepted. Emphasis upon control as criterion, as elaborated by Skinner, is not only inadequate but also dangerous. Finally some questions are raised about the relationship between psychological theories and methodology, and background conceptions of man.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Bandura, A., ‘Social-Learning Theory of Identificatory Processes’, in D. A. Gosling (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1969.
Bandura, A., ‘Behavior Theory and the Models of Man’, American Psychologist 29 (1974), 859–869.
Chomsky, N., ‘Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior’, Language 35 (1959), 26–58.
Chomsky, N., For Reasons of State, Vintage Books, New York, 1973.
Chomsky, N., Reflections on Language, Pantheon Books, New York, 1975.
Fodor, J., The Language of Thought, Crowell, New York, 1975.
Gewirtz, J. L., ‘Mechanisms of Social Learning: Some Roles of Stimulation and Behavior in Early Human Development’, in D. A. Gosling (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1969.
Lacey, H. M., ‘The Scientific Study of Linguistic Behavior: a Perspective on the Skinner-Chomsky Controversy’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 4 (1974), 17–51.
Lacey, H. M., ‘On Operants and Voluntary Behavior’, Ethics 85 (1975), 349–352.
Lacey, H. M., ‘On the Value Neutrality of the Sciences’, in preparation.
Lacey, M. I., ‘Aplicação da Análise do Comportamento: com Referência Especial a Estudos da Sala de Aula’, Ciência e Cultura 27 (1975), 43–49.
Levine, F. M. and Fasnacht, G., ‘Token Rewards May Lead to Token Learning’, American Psychologist 29 (1974), 816–820.
Nelson, R. J., ‘Behaviorism is False’, The Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969), 417–451.
Nelson, R. J., ‘Behaviorism, Finite Automata, and Stimulus-Response Theory’, Theory and Decision 6 (1975), 249–268.
Rachlin, H., ‘On the Tautology of the Matching Law’, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 15 (1971), 249–251.
Schwartz, B., ‘Meanwhile, Back in the Box: New Developments in Operant Conditioning and their Implications’, in Gergen, K. J., Greenberg, M., and Willis, R. (eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, Wiley, New York, in press.
Scriven, M., ‘An Essential Unpredictability in Human Behavior’, in B. Wolman and E. Nagel (eds.), Scientific Psychology: principles and approaches, Basic Books, New York, 1965.
Skinner, B. F., Science and Human Behavior, Macmillan, New York, 1953.
Skinner, B. F., Verbal Behavior, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1957.
Skinner, B. F., Contingencies of Reinforcement, a Theoretical Analysis, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1969.
Skinner, B. F., Beyond Freedom and Dignity, Knopf, New York, 1971.
Skinner, B. F., Cumulative Record, 3rd edition, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1972.
Skinner, B. F., About Behaviorism, Knopf, New York, 1974.
Willems, E. P., ‘Behavioral Technology and Behavioral Ecology’, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 7 (1974), 151–165.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this paper was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation (Grant No. SOC75-08464), and it was written while the author was a visiting scholar at Standford University. I am grateful to D. Bullock, Maria I. Lacey, Howard Rachlin and E. E. Smith for helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lacey, H.M. Skinner on the prediction and control of behavior. Theor Decis 10, 353–385 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126347
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126347