Skip to main content
Log in

On the foundations of mean-variance analyses

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let (μ, σ) and (μ′, σ′) be mean-standard deviation pairs of two probability distributions on the real line. Mean-variance analyses presume that the preferred distribution depends solely on these pairs, with primary preference given to larger mean and smaller variance. This presumption, in conjunction with the assumption that one distribution is better than a second distribution if the mass of the first is completely to the right of the mass of the second, implies that (μ, σ) is preferred to (μ′, σ′) if and only if either μ > μ′ or (μ = μ′ and σ < σ′), provided that the set of distributions is sufficiently rich. The latter provision fails if the outcomes of all distributions lie in a finite interval, but then it is still possible to arrive at more liberal dominance conclusions between (μ, σ) and (μ′, σ′).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Bierwag, G. O., ‘The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis: Comment’, Amer. Econ. Rev. 64 (1974), 431–433.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bierwag, G. O. and Grove, M. A., ‘Indifference Curves in Asset Analysis’, Econ. J. 76 (1966), 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borch, K., ‘A Note on Utility and Attitudes to Risk’, Management Sci. 9 (1963), 697–700.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borch, K., ‘Indifference Curves and Uncertainty’, Swedish J. Econ. 70 (1968), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borch, K., ‘A Note on Uncertainty and Indifference Curves’, Rev. Econ. Stud. 36 (1969), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borch, K., ‘The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis: Comment’, Amer. Econ. Rev. 64 (1974), 428–430.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chipman, J. S., ‘The Foundations of Utility’, Econometrica 28 (1960), 193–224.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chipman, J. S., ‘Non-Archimedean Behavior under Risk: an Elementary Analysis - with Application to the Theory of Assets’, in Preferences, Utility, and Demand, (ed. by) J. S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M. K. Richter and H. F. Sonnenschein, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chipman, J. S., ‘The Ordering of Portfolios in Terms of Mean and Variance’, Rev. Econ. Stud. 40 (1973), 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cramér, H., ‘A Theorem on Ordered Sets of Probability Distributions’, Theory Prob. Appl. 1 (1956), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Debreu, G., ‘Representation of a Preference Ordering by a Numerical Function’, in Decision Processes (ed. by) R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs and R. L. Davis, Wiley, New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Feldstein, M. S., ‘Mean-Variance Analysis in the Theory of Liquidity Preference and Portfolio Selection’, Rev. Econ. Stud. 36 (1969), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fishburn, P. C., ‘A Study of Lexicographic Expected Utility’, Management Sci. 17 (1971), 672–678.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hausner, M., ‘Multidimensional Utilities’, in Decision Processes (ed. by) R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs and R. L. Davis, Wiley, New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klevorick, A., ‘A Note on “The Ordering of Portfolios in Terms of Mean and Variance”’, Rev. Econ. Stud. 40 (1973), 293–296.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levy, H., ‘The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis: Comment’, Amer. Econ. Rev. 64 (1974), 434–441.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Markowitz, H. M., ‘Portfolio Selection’, J. Finance 7 (1952), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Markowitz, H. M., Portfolio Selection, Wiley, New York, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Samuelson, P. A., ‘General Proof that Diversification Pays’, J. Finance Quant. Anal. 2 (1967), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Samuelson, P. A., ‘The Fundamental Approximation Theorem of Portfolio Analysis in Terms of Means, Variances, and Higher Moments’, Rev. Econ. Stud. 37 (1970), 537–542.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tobin, J., ‘Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk’, Rev. Econ. Stud. 25 (1958), 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tobin, J., ‘The Theory of Portfolio Selection’, in The Theory of Interest Rates (ed. by F. H. Hahn and F. P. R. Brechling), Macmillan, London, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tsiang, S. C., ‘The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis, Skewness Preference, and the Demand for Money’, Amer. Econ. Rev. 62 (1972), 354–371.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tsiang, S. C., ‘The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis: Reply and Errata for Original Article’, Amer. Econ. Rev. 64 (1974), 442–450.

    Google Scholar 

  25. von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by the Office of Naval Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fishburn, P.C. On the foundations of mean-variance analyses. Theor Decis 10, 99–111 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126333

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126333

Keywords

Navigation