Skip to main content
Log in

The methodological status of Popper's rationality principle

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Popper's account of situational explanations is contrasted with the models of Dray and Hempel. Popper's Rationality Principle has the unusual feature of positing causal connections between objective ideas (world 3) and human behaviour (world 1).

Popper's methodological policy concerning the Rationality Principle seems to be in direct conflict with his general theory of scientific method. However, I argue that Popper has underestimated the empirical content and criticizability of the Rationality Principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Dray, W. H., Laws and Explanation in History, Oxford University Press, London, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G., Aspects of Scientific Explanation, Free Press, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koertge, N., ‘On Popper's Philosophy of Social Science’, in K. F. Schaffner and R. S. Cohen (eds.), PSA 1972, Vol. XX: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974, pp. 195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., ‘Stages of Moral Development as a Basis for Moral Education’, in C. M. Beck, B. S. Crittenden, and E. V. Sullivan (eds.), Moral Education, University of Toronto Press, 1971, pp. 23–92.

  • Lakatos, I., ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, 1970, pp. 91–196.

  • Lee, W., Decision Theory and Human Behavior, Wiley, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, English ed., Hutchinson, London, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R., The Poverty of Historicism, 3rd ed., Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R., The Open Society and Its Enemies, 4th ed., Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962.

  • Popper, K. R., Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R., ‘La rationalité et le statut du principe de rationalité’, in E. M. Classen (ed.), Les Fondements Philosophiques des Systèmes Economiques, Payot, Paris, 1967, pp. 142–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R., Objective Knowledge, Oxford University Press, London, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Vol. XIV, The Library of Living Philosophers, Open Court, La Salle, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science 185 (1974) 1124–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. C. and Johnson-Laird, P. N., Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J. W. N., ‘Imperfect Rationality’, in R. Borger and F. Cioffi (eds.), Explanation in the Behavioral Sciences, Cambridge University Press, 1970, pp. 167–217.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koertge, N. The methodological status of Popper's rationality principle. Theor Decis 10, 83–95 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126332

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126332

Keywords

Navigation