Skip to main content
Log in

Mean utility preserving increases in risk for state dependent utility functions

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paperFootnote 1 defines the concept of a mean utility preserving spread across states (MUPSAS) for state dependent utility functions and analyzes the behavioural impact of shifts in the probability distribution of wealth across states such that overall mean utility is preserved. The main result provides an alternative way of ranking state dependent utility functions according to their degree of risk aversion (thus extending Kami's theorem of comparative risk aversion) and establishes a link between increases in risk and risk aversion for state dependent preferences. In a portfolio problem where preferences and the rate of return of the risky venture are state dependent, we find sufficient conditions to determine the impact of a MUPSAS on the optimal share of the portfolio invested in the risky asset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This paper is revised version of Essay 2 of my Ph.D. dissertation written at The John Hopkins University. I am grateful to my thesis advisers, Edi Kami and Itzhak Zilcha, to Mark Machina, who discussed the paper at the Winter 1984 meeting of the Econometric Society in Dallas, and to Fanny Demers for valuable comments. I also thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Ministry of Education of the government of Quebec for financial support.

References

  • Arrow, Kenneth J.: 1974, ‘Optimal insurance and generalized deductibles’, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1–42.

  • Cook, Philip, J. and Daniel A. Graham: 1977, ‘The demand for insurance and protection: The case of irreplaceable commodities’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 91, 143–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Peter A. and Joseph E. Stiglitz: 1974, ‘Increases in risk and risk aversion’, Journal of Economic Theory 8, 337–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, Georges: 1982, ‘Moral hazard and state-dependent utility function’, Journal of Risk and Insurance 49, 405–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freixas, Xavier and Jean-Jacques Laffont: 1984, ‘On the irreversibility effect’, in Marcel Boyer and Richard Kihlstrom (eds.), Bayesian Models in Economic Theory (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.), 105–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freixas, Xavier and Richard Kihlstrom: 1984, ‘Risk aversion and information demand’, in Marcel Boyer and Richard Kihlstrom (eds.), Bayesian Models in Economic Theory (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.), 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni, Edi: 1983a, ‘Risk aversion for state-dependent utility functions: Measurement and applications’, International Economic Review 24, 637–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni, Edi: 1983b, ‘On the correspondence between multivariate risk aversion with state-dependent preferences’, Journal of Economic Theory 30, 230–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni, Edi: 1983c, ‘Risk aversion in the theory of health insurance’, in E. Helpman, A. Razin and E. Sadka (eds.), Social Policy Evaluation: An Economic Perspective (New York: Academic Press), 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni, Edi: 1985, ‘Increasing risk with state-dependent preferences’, Journal of Economic Theory 35, 172–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni, Edi: 1985, Decision-Making under Uncertainty: The Case of State-Dependent Preferences (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni, Edi and Itzhak Zilcha: 1983a, ‘Risk aversion in the theory of life insurance’, Working Paper, No. 99, Department of Political Economy, The Johns Hopkins University.

  • Karni, Edi, David Schmeidler, and Karl Vind: 1983, ‘On state-dependent preferences and subjective probabilities’, Econometrica 51, 1021–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, Mark: 1982, ‘Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom’, Econometrica 50, 277–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, Mark: 1983a, ‘Generalized expected utility analysis and the nature of observed violations of the independence axiom’, in B. Stigum and F. Wenstop (eds.), Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory with Applications (Dordrecht, Holland; D. Reidel Publishing Co.), 263–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, Mark: 1983b, ‘The economic theory of individual behavior toward risk: Theory, evidence and new directions’, Center for Research on Organizational Efficiency, Technical Report, No. 433, Stanford University.

  • Marshall, John M.: 1984, ‘Gambles and the Shadow Price of Death’, American Economic Review 74, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roëll, Ailsa: 1984, ‘Essays in the theory of comparative risk aversion with special reference to the case-state dependent preferences’, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Economy, The Johns Hopkins University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demers, M. Mean utility preserving increases in risk for state dependent utility functions. Theor Decis 23, 113–128 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126301

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126301

Keywords

Navigation