Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative molecular field analysis of CCK-A antagonists using field-fit as an alignment technique. A convenient guide to design new CCK-A ligands

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) has been used as a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) method to correlate the affinities of several antagonists towards CCK-A receptors with their steric and electrostatic fields. In this publication, we describe, for the first time, a field-fit operation as an alignment technique. These results could serve as a guide for the design of new non-peptide antagonists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mutt, V. and Jorpes, J.E., Klin. Wochenschr., 48 (1970) 65.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morley, J.E., Life Sci., 30 (1982) 479.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moran, J.H., Robinson, P., Goldrich, M.S. and McHugh, P., Brain Res., 362 (1986) 175.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stacher, G., Psychoneuroendocrinology, 11 (1986) 39.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mutt, V., In Glass, G.B.J. (Ed.), Gastrointestinal Hormones, Raven, New York, (1980) 169–221.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lotti, V.J., Pendleton, R.G., Gould, R.J., Hanson, H.M., Chang, R.S.L. and Clineschmidt, B.V., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 241 (1987) 103.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Silverman, M.A., Greenberg, R.E. and Bank, S., Am. J. Gastroentero, 82 (1987) 703.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lybrand, T., McCammon, J.A. and Wipff, G., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83 (1986) 833.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bash, P.A., Singh, U.C., Langridge, R. and Kollman, P.A., Science, 235 (1987) 574.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goetz, M.A., Lopez, M., Monaghan, R.L., Chang, R.S.L., Lotti, V.J. and Chen, T.B., J. Antibiot., 38 (1985) 1633.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liesch, J.M., Hensens, O.D., Springer, J.P., Chang, R.S.L. and Lotti, V.J., J. Antibiot., 38 (1985) 1638.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chang, R.S.L., Lotti, V.J., Monaghan, R.L., Birnbaum, J., Stapley, E.O., Goetz, M.A., Albers-Schonberg, G., Patchett, A.A., Liesch, J.M., Hensens, O.D. and Springer, J.P., Science, 230 (1985) 177.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Evans, B.E., Bock, M.G., Rittle, K.E., Dipardo, R.M., Whitter, W.L., Veber, D.F., Anderson, P.S. and Freidinger, R.M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 (1986) 4918.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Evans, B.E., Bock, M.G., Rittle, K.E., Dipardo, R.M., Whitter, W.L., Veber, D.F., Anderson, P.S., Freidinger, R.M., Lundell, G.F., Chang, R.S.L., Lotti, V.J., Cerino, D.J., Chen, T.B., Kling, P.J., Kunkel, K.A., Springer, J.P. and Hirshfield, J., J. Med. Chem., 31 (1988) 2235.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guidotti, A., Furchetti, G.M., Corda, M.G., Konkel, D., Bennet, G.D. and Costa, E., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80 (1983) 3531.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bock, M.G., Dipardo, R.M., Evans, B.E., Rittle, K.E., Whitter, W.L., Veber, D.F., Anderson, P.S. and Freidinger, R.M., J. Med. Chem., 32 (1989) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Freidinger, R.M., Whitter, W.L., Gould, N.P., Holloway, M.K., Chang, R.S.L. and Lotti, V.J., J. Med. Chem., 33 (1990) 591.

    Google Scholar 

  18. SYBYL version 5.4, TRIPOS Associates, Inc., St. Louis, MO, running on Unix with Evans & Sutherland ESV III workstation.

  19. Clark, M., Cramer III, R.D., and VanOpdenbosh, N.J., Comput. Chem., 10 (1989) 982.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vinter, J.G., Davis, A. and Saunders, M.R.J., Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 1 (1987) 31.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berendsen, H.J.C., Postma, J.P.M., Van Gunsteren, W.F., Dinola, A. and Haak, J.R.J., Chem. Phys., 81 (1984) 3684.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Saunders, M.J., Am. Chem. Soc., 109 (1987) 3150.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cramer III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5959.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Clark, M., Cramer, R.D., Jones, D.M., Patterson, D.E. and Simperath, P.E., Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol., 3 (1990) 47.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nelder, J.A. and Mead, R., Comp. J., 7 (1965) 308.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marshall, G.R. and Motoc, I., Topics in Molecular Pharmacology, 3 (1986) 115.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gasteiger, J. and Marsili, M., Tetrahedron, 36 (1980) 3219.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wold, S., Ruhe, A., Wold, H. and Dunn III, W.J., J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 5 (1984) 735.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cramer III, R.D., Bunce, J.D., Patterson, D.E. and Frank, I.E., Quant. Struct. Act. Relat., 7 (1988) 18.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cruse, W.B.T., Egert, E., Viswamitra, M.A. and Kennard, O., Acta Cryst., B 38 (1982) 1758.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Borea, P.A., Arnzeim.-Forsch./Drug Res., 33 (1983) 1086.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rault, S., Bureau, R., Pilo, J.C. et al. Comparative molecular field analysis of CCK-A antagonists using field-fit as an alignment technique. A convenient guide to design new CCK-A ligands. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 6, 553–568 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126214

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126214

Key words

Navigation