Skip to main content
Log in

Equity, efficiency and environmental quality

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many government policies ostensibly designed to serve allocative ends appear to be driven primarily if not exclusively by redistributive considerations. This paper analyzes one such policy, the New Source Performance Standards of the Clean Air Act of 1977, using data derived principally from studies commissioned by and known to those involved in the policy making process. These data are used to produce estimates of the magnitude and relative efficiency of the wealth transfers effected by the policy. Among our conclusions are that, at least with respect to this particular episode, (a) environmental regulation is an extremely inefficient method of transferring wealth and (b) transfers between groups within regions of the U.S. are large relative to transfers between those regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, B.A., and Hassler, W.T. (1980). Beyond the New Deal: Coal and the Clean Air Act. Yale Law Journal 89 (July 1980): 1466–1571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B.A., and Hassler, W.T. (1981). Clean coal dirty air. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baughman, M.L., Joskow, P.L., and Kamat, D.P. (1979). Electric power in the United States: Models and policy analysis. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1976). Comment [on Peltzman]. Journal of Law and Economics 19 (August).

  • Becker, G. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 83 (August).

  • Browning, E. (1978). The marginal welfare cost of income redistribution. Southern Economic Journal 45 (July).

  • Browning, E., and Johnson, W.R. (1979). Taxes, transfers and income inequality. In G. Walton (Ed.), Regulatory change in an atmosphere of crisis: Current day implications of the Roosevelt years. Academic Press.

  • Browning, E., and Johnson, W.R. (1983). The distributional and efficiency effects of increasing the minimum wage: A simulation. American Economic Review 73 (March).

  • Browning, E., and Johnson, W.R. (1984). The trade-off between equality and efficiency. Journal of Political Economy 92 (April).

  • Crandall, R. (1982). Controlling industrial pollution: The economics and politics of clean air. Mimeo 27 May.

  • Crandall, R. and Lave, L. (1981). The scientific basis of health and safety regulation. Brookings Institution.

  • Danziger, S., Haveman, R., and Plotnick, R. (1981). How income transfer programs affect work, savings, and the income distribution: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 19 (September).

  • Harberger, A. (1971). Three basic postulates for applied welfare economics: An interpretive essay. Journal of Economic Literature 9.

  • Higgings, R.S., Shugart II, W.F., and Tollison, R.D. (1985). Free entry and efficient rent seeking. Public Choice 46.

  • Landsberg, H.H. (1982). ‘Energy haves’ and ‘have nots’. In K.A. Price (Ed.), Regional conflict and national policy. Washington: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T.G. (1978). The beneficiaries of trucking regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 21 (October).

  • National Economic Research Associates, (1981). Economic, energy and environmental impacts of revisions to New Source Performance Standards for electric generating plants. Mimeo 6 March.

  • Navarro, P. (1980). The politics of air pollution. The Public Interest (59) (Spring): 36–44.

  • Navarro, P. (1981). The 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments: Energy, environmental, economic and distributional impacts. Energy and Environmental Policy Center, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paglin, M. (1975). The measurement and trend of inequality: A basic revision. American Economic review 65 (September).

  • Pashigian, B.P. (1982). Environmental regulation: Whose self-interests are being protected? Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, University of Chicago, August.

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Towards a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19 (August).

  • Pigou, A. (1946). The economics of welfare 4th ed. London.

  • Posner, R. (1971). Taxation by regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (Spring).

  • Posner, R. (1975). The social costs of monopoly and regulation. Journal of Political Economy 83 (August).

  • Siegan, B.H. (1980). Economic liberties and the Constitution. University of Chicago.

  • Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (Spring).

  • Tullock, G. (1962). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopoly and theft. Western Economics Journal 5 (June).

  • Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison and G. Tullock, Towards a theory of a rent-seeking society. Texas A&M Press.

  • Tullock, G. (1985). Back to the bog. Public Choice 46.

  • U.S. Congress. (1977). The Clean Air Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. No. 95-95, 7 August.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1970). The Clean Air Act. Washington, D.C. December.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1979). New stationary sources performance standards: Electric utility steam generating unit. Federal Register 44 (113) 11 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M.B. (1981). The U.S. coal industry: The economics of policy choice. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are greatly indebted to Professor Martin Zimmerman for his assistance in this project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daly, G., Mayor, T. Equity, efficiency and environmental quality. Public Choice 51, 141–159 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125995

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125995

Keywords

Navigation