Conclusion
For the most part, economic studies have not exhibited even a rudimentary awareness of the elements of the consolidation record discussed in the previous section. This neglect stems from an implicit assumption that the institutional structure underlying consolidation has no impact on outcomes. Models have been constructed as if real-world consolidations require the consent of all parties. While not logically contradictory, we have argued that this approach has little to do with actual processes. Most successful consolidations simply do not provide all residents of the metropolitan community with the opportunity of choosing between the status quo and agglomeration. Redistributive processes are the norm. Future studies on consolidation must proceed from this basic observation.
References
Chinitz, Benjamin, and Cowing, Thomas G. “The Impact of Local Public Service Consolidation on Urban Spatial Structure,” Local Service Pricing Policies and Their Effect on Urban Spatial Structure, Edited by Paul B. Downing, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1977, pp. 267–85.
Ellickson, Bryan. “Jurisdictional Fragmentation and Residential Choice,” American Economic Review, 62, May, 1971, pp. 334–39.
Koleda, Michael. “A Public Good Model of Governmental Consolidation,” Urban Studies, 8, June, 1971, pp. 103–110.
Toma, Mark. “Institutional Structures and Local Government Consolidation,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1977.
Additional information
California State University, Northridge. This paper is based on research presented in my dissertation. I thank Richard Wagner for his direction during the original research, and I also appreciate the comments by colleagues on a draft given in a seminar at California State University, Northridge.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toma, M. The impact of institutional structures on city-country consolidation outcomes. Public Choice 34, 117–122 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125757
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125757