Abstract
Planners and administrators in North American rural communities proximate to cities have struggled over the last decade to cope with expanding populations. Amongst the questions posed by this population growth, those associated with the municipal provision of services are considered to be of paramount importance by many commentators. This article examines conventional wisdom on the service-provision implications of rural population growth in light of evidence gained through surveys of rural residents in an urbanizing region of Southern Ontario, Canada. A trade-off game is used to produce budget-constrained community preferences on priorities of municipal service provision; preferences are shown to be more complex in their relationship to residents' characteristics, such as length of residence, than is often suggested in the literature. Moreover, when asked to indicate their preference concerning the broad trade-off between service levels and taxes, 41 percent preferred the status quo and 40 percent opted for increased services and taxes, whilst only 10 percent preferred to save on taxes by sacrificing service quality. It is suggested that policy makers consider carefully the design limitations of survey instruments prior to phrasing policy on service provision. In situations like those created by Proposition 13 in California and Proposition 2 1/2 in Massachusetts, the implications of budget cuts became apparent to residents only as services seriously deteriorated or disappeared altogether. By conducting a trade-off game or some suitable alternative, the implications of tax changes for service provision became apparent to residents without the changes having to occur in reality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, R.W. (1973). “Land speculation and scattered development: failures in the urban fringe land market”, Urban Studies 10: 367–382.
Golob, T.F., E.T. Canty, and R.L. Gustafson (1972). “An analysis of consumer preferences for a public transportation system,” Transportation Research 6: 81–102.
Harvey, R.D. and W.A.V. Clark (1965). “The nature and economics of urban sprawl”, Land Economics 41: 1–9.
Hennigh, L. (1978). “The good life and the taxpayers' revolt”, Rural Sociology 43: 178–190.
Hoinville, G. (1971). “Evaluating community preferences”, Environment and Planning 3: 33–50.
Joseph, A.E. and A. Poyner (1982), “Interpreting patterns of public service utilization in rural areas”, Economic Geography 58: 262–273.
Joseph, A.E. and B. Smit (1981). “Implications of exurban residential development: a review”, Canadian Journal of Regional Science 4: 207–224.
Joseph, A.E. and B. Smit (1983). “Preferences for public service provision in rural areas undergoing exurban residential development—a Canadian view”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 74: 41–52.
Joseph, A.E., B. Smit, and K.B. Beesley (1982). Public Input Into Planning for Municipal Service Provision: A Method and Case Study. Report No. 14, Studies in Rural Adjustment, Guelph, Ontario: Department of Geography, University of Guelph.
Joseph, A.E., B. Smit, and A. Poyner (1980). The Provision of Municipal Public Services in Wellington County. Report No. 10, Studies in Rural Adjustment, Guelph, Ontario: Department of Geography, University of Guelph.
Knight, R.L. and M.D. Menchik (1974). Residential Environmental Attitudes and Preferences: Report of a Questionnaire Survey. Report No. 24, Institute of Environmental Studies, Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin.
Metcalf, J. (1968). Satisfaction and Housing Standards. IN 159/67, Building Research Station, Garston: England.
Mogulof, M. (1980). “Assessing the reactions to proposition 13”, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 50: 221–224.
Peterson, G. (1968). “Values and goals for urban development”, in Barton-Aschman Associates, Guidelines for New Systems of Urban Transportation. Vol. II, Chicago: Barton-Aschman Associates.
Pollio, H.B. (1974). The Psychology of Symbolic Activity. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
Reynolds, I. and C. Nicholson (1970). Estate Outside the Dwelling. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
Robinson, I.M., W.D. Baer, T.K. Banerjee, and P.G. Flachsbart (1975). “Trade-off games”, in W. Michelson (ed.), Behavioural Research Methods in Environmental Design. Stroudsburg: Bowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
Schwarzweller, H.K. (1979). “Migration and the changing rural scene”, Rural Sociology 44: 7–23.
Scitovsky, T. (1971). Welfare and Competition. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Smit, B. and A.E. Joseph (1982). “Trade-off analysis of preferences for public services”, Environment and Behaviour 14: 238–258.
Smit, B. and A.E. Joseph (1983). “Taxpayers' views on the provision of municipal services”, Plan Canada 23: 4–13.
Smit, B., A. Joseph, S. Alexander, and G. McIlravey (1984). Non-Farm Residential Development, Service Provision, Taxes and Policy: The Case of Puslinch Township. Occasional Paper No. 4, Department of Geography, University of Guelph.
Webber, M.M. (1973). “Alternative styles for citizen participation in transport planning”, DMG-DRS Journal: Design Research and Methods 7: 60–64.
Wilson, R.L. (1962). “Livability of the city: attitudes and urban development”, in F.S. Chapin and S.F. Weiss (eds.), Urban Growth Dynamics in a Regional Cluster of Cities. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Research Grant No. 410-80-0442) and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (Program 40).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joseph, A.E., Smit, B. Taxes versus services: Municipal service provision in growing rural communities. Popul Res Policy Rev 4, 51–66 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125541
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125541