Skip to main content
Log in

The ambiguities of U.S. temporary foreign worker policy

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expansion of temporary worker programs has figured prominently in recent proposals to reform United States immigration policy. The Florida sugar cane industry has been using foreign workers from the English-speaking Caribbean since 1943. The 8000 to 9000 workers annually admitted under section H-2 of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act to cut cane constitute the largest legal nonimmigrant labor force in the United States. Examination of the Florida H-2 program reveals that existing temporary worker policy is ambiguous, if not contradictory, on the issues of the displacement of domestic workers; the characteristics and value of H-2 workers; their impact on local communities in the United States; and the effects of seasonal labor migration on the migrant and his country. Suggestions for improving policy include strengthening of statutory guidelines and administrative agencies, adoption of a more market-sensitive adverse effect wage rate, making farm labor more attractive to American workers, removing distinctions between foreign and domestic workers, and measures to improve the lot of the migrant and his home society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allstrom, Peter (1982). Packet of Materials Detailing AFL-CIO Position on H-2 Provisions of Simpson-Mazzoli (August 30).

  • Caribbean/Central American Action (1981). C/CAA's Caribbean Databook. Washington, DC: C/CAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, George (1983). “Testimony of Attorney with Florida Rural Legal Services before House Subcommittee on Labor Standards,” Belle Glade, Florida, April 11 (photocopy of prepared statement).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel (1975). “Immigration of workers and class struggles in advanced capitalism: the Western European experience,” Politics and Society 5: 33–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Sugar Cane League(1980–1984). Florida Sugar Cane News.

  • Kramer, Peter (1966). The Offshores: A Study of Foreign Farm Labor in Florida. St. Petersburg.

  • Martin, Philip L. (1984). “Illegal Immigration in California Agriculture,” paper delivered at the 1984 Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington.

  • Martin, Philip L. and Mark J. Miller (1980). “Guestworkers: lessons from Western Europe,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 33: 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, Terry L. (1984a). “The Impact of U.S. Temporary Worker Programs on Caribbean Development: Evidence from H-2 Workers in Florida Sugar,” paper delivered at the conference on “Migration and Development in the Caribbean,” sponsored by the School of Public Affairs, University of Maryland.

  • McCoy, Terry L. (1984b). “U.S. Sugar Policy and its Effects on the Caribbean,” paper delivered at the IX Annual Conference of the Caribbean Studies Association, St. Kitts.

  • McCoy, Terry L. and Charles H. Wood (1982). “Caribbean Workers in the Florida Sugar Cane Industry,” Occasional Paper No. 2 of the Caribbean Migration Program, Center for Latin American Studies, University of Florida.

  • Migrant Legal Action Program et al. (1980). “The H-2 Program: Temporary Alien Workers in U.S. Agriculture,” An Analysis and Position Paper Submitted to the Select Committee on Immigration and Refugee Policy (photocopy).

  • Mulkey, David and John Gordon (1979). “The Economic Importance of the Sugar Industry in South Florida,” Staff Paper 117, Food and Resource Economics Department, Institute for Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.

  • National Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Forum (1983–84). Forum Information Bulletin.

  • North, David S. (1980). Nonimmigrant Workers in the U.S.: Current Trends and Future Implications. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, Robert (1984). “Migration and Development in the Caribbean: The Policy Challenge,” paper delivered at conference on “Migration and Development in the Caribbean,” sponsored by the School of Public Affairs, University of Maryland.

  • Pastor, Robert Rosemarie Rogers (1984). “Using Migration to Enhance Development in the Caribbean: A Proposal,” paper delivered at conference on “Migration and Development in the Caribbean,” sponsored by the School of Public Affairs, University of Maryland.

  • Portes, Alejandro (1983). “Of borders and states: a skeptical note on the legislative control of immigration,” in Wayne A. Cornelius and Ricardo Anzaldua Montoya (eds.), America's New Immigration Law: Origins, Rationales, and Potential Consequences. Monograph Series 11, San Diego, California: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, Joshua (1981). “The migrant syndrome: seasonal U.S. wage labor and rural development in central Mexico,” Human Organization 40: 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reubens, Edwin P. (1979). Temporary Admission of Foreign Workers. Special Report on Employment, National Commission Policy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reubens, Edwin P. (1981). “Interpreting migration: current models and a new integration,” Occasional Paper No. 29. New York: New York Research Program in Inter-American Affairs, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, Hymie (1983). “Remittances and rural underdevelopment in the English-speaking Caribbean,” Human Organization 42: 295–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy (1981). U.S. Immigration Policy and the National Interest. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorn, George, F. and James Terrill (1983). “Testimony of the Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association Before House Subcommittee on Labor Standards. Presented on behalf of the Florida Sugar Cane Employers of H-2 Workers,” hearing held at Belle Glade, Florida, April 11 (photocopy of prepared statement).

  • State of Florida, Department of Labor and Employment Security, Division of Employment Security, Bureau of Employment Services (1980). Field Memorandum: Sugar Cane Clearance Orders. Tallahassee.

  • United States Congress, Senate, Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Immigration (1978). The West Indies (BWI) Temporary Alien Labor Program, 1943–1977: A Study, 95th Congress, 2nd Session. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (1978). “Temporary employment of alien agricultural and logging workers in the U.S.: labor certification process,” Federal Registrar 43, No. 48: 10306–10318.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Employment Service, Division of Labor Certifications (1982). “Labor Certifications Granted for Temporary Foreign Workers (H-2s) in Agriculture and Logging Occupations,” (photocopy January 29).

  • Weintraub, Sidney and Stanley R. Ross (1982) “Temporary” Alien Workers in the United States: Designing Policy from Fact and Opinion. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Robert A. (1981). “Testimony before the Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommit- tee on Immigration and Refugee Policy, United States Senate, Concerning Temporary Worker Program,” (photocopy of prepared statement).

  • Williams, Robert A. (1982). “The Task Rate System in Sugarcane,” Memo from Florida Rural Legal Services Attorney (November 3).

  • Wood, Charles, H. (1982). “Equilibrium and historical-structural perspectives on migration,” International Migration Review 16: 298–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Charles, H. (1984). “West Indian Cane Cutters in Florida: A study of the Relative Cost of Foreign and Domestic Labor,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Antonio, Texas.

  • Wood, Charles H. and Terry L. McCoy (forthcoming). “Seasonal migration, remittances and development: a study of Caribbean cane cutters in Florida,” International Migration Review.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is drawn from a study funded by a grant from the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD-14277-01). The Center for Latin American Studies and the Division of Sponsored Research of the University of Florida provided additional financial support for field work in the Caribbean. Fuller discussions of the results are found in McCoy (1984a), McCoy and Wood (1982) and Wood and McCoy (forthcoming). The author would like to acknowledge the suggestions of Jose Alvarez, Robert Bach, Marian Houston, Steve Sanderson and Charles Wood, his collaborator on the larger project. The comments of David North and especially Edwin Reubens on an earlier version, presented at the 1984 meeting of the American Political Science Association, are also appreciated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCoy, T.L. The ambiguities of U.S. temporary foreign worker policy. Popul Res Policy Rev 4, 31–49 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125540

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125540

Keywords

Navigation