Skip to main content
Log in

Gauging Hispanic voting strength

Paradoxes and pitfalls

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How a minority group's demographic presence in a district translates into a presence among the voters in that district is a matter of growing importance to political scientists and courts. This paper examines technical problems in measuring the concentration of Hispanic voting strength among the eligible voters in an election district. We document and analyze several limitations with existing demographic data in localities where a minority has a distinctive citizenship, ethnic, and age makeup. Our findings show how different measurement techniques may distort or clarify one's view of local Hispanic voting strength. County-wide measures of age and citizenship have a generic limitation: using such measures to infer the character of particular county sub-areas may falsely inflate the apparent voting strength of Hispanics. Other specific limitations relate to (1) the use of voting-age population (or self-reported voting-age citizens) in gauging the actual concentration of Hispanic registrants in an area and (2) the definition of ‘Hispanic’ itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bean, F.D. and Tienda M. (1989).The Hispanic Population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.A.V. and Mueller, M. (1988). Hispanic relocation and spatial assimilation: A case study,Social Science Quarterly 69: 468–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.A.V. and Morrison, P.A. (1991). Demographic paradoxes in the Los Angeles voting rights case,Evaluation Review 15: 712–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., Haub, C. and Willette, J. (1983). US Hispanics: Changing the face of America,Population Bulletin 38: 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoefer, M. (1991). The legalization program in California. Presented at the 4th Annual Demographic Workshop on First Results of the 1990 Census, at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.C. (1982). Undocumented migration from Mexico: Some geographical questions,Annals of the Association of American Geographers 72: 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, P.A. and Clark, W.A.V. (1992). Local redistricting: the demographic context of local boundary drawing,National Civic Review (forthcoming).

  • Passel, J.S. and Woodrow, K.A. (1984). Geographic distribution of undocumented immigrants: Estimates of undocumented aliens counted in the 1980 Census by state,International Migration Review 18: 642–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passel, J.S. (1988). Letter to John Weeks, ‘Estimates of proportion Hispanic of citizens by age: 1980 Census, Los Angeles County, California‘.

  • Warren, R. and Passel, J.S. (1987). A count of the uncountable: Estimates of undocumented aliens counted in the 1980 United States Census,Demography 24: 375–394, and unpublished technical appendix.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, W.A.V., Morrison, P.A. Gauging Hispanic voting strength. Popul Res Policy Rev 11, 145–156 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125535

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125535

Keywords

Navigation