Skip to main content
Log in

The metaphorical constraints to pay equity: Why so many economists are outraged by comparable worth

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The doctrine of comparable worth is frequently denounced by economists as inefficient, unnecessary, unworkable, incredibly costly, and replete with unfortunate consequences for the same low-wage workers it alleges to be helping. This paper attempts to identify an explanation for both the vigor and content of economists' common antipathy toward comparable worth. The methodology of the paper is taken from Donald McCloskey's recent The Rhetoric of Economics and Feyerabend's epistemology of conversation.

A content analysis of economists' criticisms of comparable worth reveals a much different methodology from that deified in the beginning chapters of Principles of Economics texts. Facts and empirical validation are not the primary bases responsible for their conclusions. The theoretical and empirical support for current relative wages is not solid enough to explain either the near-unanimity of economists' arguments or their vitriolic tone.

This paper analyzes the fundamental role played by metaphor in guiding economists' analysis of comparable worth. Metaphor is treated in this paper as a pre-rational image that, much like Kuhn's paradigms, provides insight and establishes blind spots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L., et. al. (1981). “The Shortage of Hospital Nurses: A New Perspective”, American Journal of Nursing 81: 1612–1615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, M. and R. Buchele (1986). The Economics of Comparable Worth. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. (1985). Midnight Economist: Broadcast Essay IX. Los Angeles: International Institute or Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almquist, E. (1979). Minorities, Gender, and Work. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1984). The Rhetoric and the Poetics of Aristotle. New York: Modern Library, 1984 edition, 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, H. (1984). Economic Theory Versus Economic Reality. Lansing, Mi.: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. and W. Capron (1959). “Dynomic Shortages and Price Rises: The Engineer - Scientist Cast”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 73: 292–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, C. (May 28, 1985). Statement reported in Sacramento Bee.

  • Barbano, J. (1982), “Characteristics of registered nurses”, Vital and Health Statistics Series 14, No. 27.

  • Barrett, N. (1979). “Women in the Job Market”, in The Subtle Revolution. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1984). “The Turn to Interpretation: An Introduction”, Partisan Review 51: 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. (1976). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, W. and J. Baron (1986). “Sex Segregation Within Occupations”, American Economic Review 76: 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, W. (1979). “Metaphor as Rhetoric: The Problem of Evaluation”, in S. Sacks (ed.), On Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. and H. Gintis (1986). Democracy andCapitalism: Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought. New Yor: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (1984). Models in Political Economy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, N. (1984). “The Fundamental Tension Between Market Wages for Women and Comparable Worth”, Journal of Law and Inequality 2: 473–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, N. (forthcoming). “Henry George and Comparable Worth: The Abuse of Market Ideology”, American Journal of Economics and Sociology.

  • Browne, N. and A. Giampetro (1986). “The Overriding Importance of Market Characteristics for the Selection of Pay Equity Strategies: The Relative Efficacy of Collective Bargaining and Litigation in the Nursing Industry”, paper presented at annual convention of he Southern Economics Association in New Orleans.

  • Bruner, J. and C. Feldman (1986). “Under Construction”, New York Review of Books 33: 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1983). The Tao of Physics. 2nd edition. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, B. and M. McEnroe (1985). “Eliminating the Gender-Based Earnings Gap: Two Alternatives,” Business Horizons 28: 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, C. (1984–85). “Keynote Address for Colloquium: Employment Discrimination in the 1980's”, New York University Review of Law and Social Change 13: 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1970). After the Revolution. New Haven: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckard, C. and H. Sherman (1974). “Monopoly Power and Sex Discrimination”, Politics and Society 4: 475–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis, A. (1982). “Power, Tactics, and the Professionalization Process”, Nursing and Health Care 15–23.

  • Doeringer, P. and M. Piore (1975). Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editor (1983). “Chicago Economics, the FTC, and the Education of the Federal Judiciary”, Antitrust Law & Economics Review 15: 1–3.

  • Eichner, A. (1983). Why Economics Is Not Yet A Science. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P. and G. Farkas (1986). Households, Employment and Gender. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldberg, R. (1984). “Comparable Worth: Toward Theory and Practice in the United States”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture nd Society 10: 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against Method: Outline of An Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filer, R. (1985). “Male-Female Wage Differences: The Importance of Compensating Differentials”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38: 426–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, W. (1984). The Equal Pay Act. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelin, R. (1985). “The Logic of Deep Disagreements”, Informal Logic 7: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, D. (1975). “Problems vs. Conflicts: Economic Theory and Ideology”, American Economic Review 65: 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garent, A. (1981). “Power, Leadership and Nursing”, Nursing Forum 20: 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graebner, W. (1984). “Doing the World's Unhealthy Work”, βThe Hastings Center Report 14: 28–37.

  • Gross, P. (1984–85). “Intellect Beyond the Law”, Cleveland State Law Review 33: 391–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, P. (1977). “The Role of Worker Expectancies in the Study of Employment Discrimination”, in P. Wallace and A. LaMond (eds.), Women, Minorities and Employment Discrimination. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelrigg, L. (1985). “Were It Not For Wods”, Social Problems 32: 234–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbroner, R. (1985). The Nature and Logic of Capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (1985). “Reason and Economic Justice”, in K. Kipnis and D. Meyers (eds.), Economic Justice: Private Rights and Public Responsibilities. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. (1981). Corporate Control, Corporate Power. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, S. (1986). A Lesser Life: The Myth of Women's Liberation in America. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1950), Leviathan. New York: E.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, L. (1977). Pink Collar Workers: Inside the World of Women's Work. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J. (1977). “The Public Image of Nursing Education in the U.S.”, Journal of Nursing Education 16: 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. (1986). Property and Prophets. 5th edition. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, S. et. al. (1984). “Comparable Worth: A Legal and Ethical Analysis”, American Business Law Journal 22: 407–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janeway, E. (1971). Man's World, Woman's Place. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalisch, P. and B. Kalisch (1980). “The Nurse Shortage, The President and Congress”, Nursing Forum 19: 138–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearny, M. (1984). World View. Novato, California: Chandler and Sharp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S. (1969). “Psychology Cannot Be A Coherent Science”, Psychology Today 3: 14, 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J. and L. Straub (1986). “Pay equity in occupations: the nursing profession”, Population Research and Policy Review 5: 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy, L. (1986). “Continuity in Change: Power and Gender in Nursing”, Journal of Professional Nursing 2: 28, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. (1985). Te Flight From Ambiguity. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilla, M. (1984). “On Goodman, Putnam, and Rorty: The Return to the Given”, Partisan Review 51: 220–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. (1977). Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C. and C. Shaor (1982). “County of Washington v. Gunther: Legal and Economic Considerations for Resolving Sex-Based Wage Discrimination Cases”, Supreme Court Review 1: 185–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C. (1980). Equal Pay for Comparable Work. Atlanta: Law and Economics Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C. (1984). Statement in βWomen in the Work Force: Pay Equity. Hearings before the Joint Economic Committee, 98th Congress, 2nd Session. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, D. and N. Settle (1980). “Financial incentive and labor supply of married professional nurses”, Nursing Research 29: 238–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D. and R. Harrison (1981). “Meaning Through Metaphor: Analogy as Epistomology”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 71: 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C. (1975). “Division of Labor Between the Sexes”, in Sex, Discrimination, and the Division of Labor 7–18.

  • Loebl, E. (1976). Humanomics. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macarov, D. (1982). Worker Productivity: Myths and Reality. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (1985). The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, W. (1986). Mythistory and Other Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, J. (1973). The Economics of Sex Discrimination New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, R. and B. Paulin (1984). “The Employment and Earnings of Women: The Comparable Worth Debate”, in Comparable Worth: Issue for the 80's, 196–214.

  • Marshall-Burnett J. (1981). “Socio-Economic Power - The Role of the Professional Organization”, International Nursing Review 28: 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oi, W. (1986). “Neglected Women and Other Implications of Comparable Worth”, Contemporary Policy Issues 4: 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, P. (1984). Internal Labor Markets. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozick, C. (1986). “The Moral Necessity of Metaphor”, Harper's Magazine 272: 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. (1985). “Background Logic, Critical Thinking, and Irrational Language Games”, Informal Logic 7: 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. (1984). “Critical Thinking: Fundamental to Education for A Free Society”, Educational Leadership 42: 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Pay Is Still on the Rise for RN's” (1984). American Journal of Nursing 1530–1539.

  • Polachek, S. (1979). “Occupational Segregation Among Women: Theory, Evidence, and Prognosis”, in C. Lloyd et. al. (ed.), Women in the Labor Market. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, S. (1984). “Women in the Economy: Perspectives on Gender Inequality”, in U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Comparable Worth: Issue for the 80's. Vol. 1.

  • Rabinow, P. and W. Sullivan (eds.) (1979). Interpretive Social Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remick, H. (1984). “Dilemmas of Implementation”, in H. Remick (ed.), Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination: Technical Possibilities and Political Realities. Philadelphia: Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1977). The Rule of Metaphor. Toronto: University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff, M. (1981). “At the Shrine of Our Lady of Fatima or Why All Political Questions Are Not All Economic”, Arizona Law Review 23: 1283–1304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleicher, N. (1984). “Nursing Is Not A Profession”, in T. Duespohl (ed.), Nursing in Transition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. and M. Ward (1984). Women's Wages and Work in the Twentieth Century. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1979). “The movement of women into the labor force”, in R. Smith (ed.), The Subtle Revolution. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L. (1983). Dangerous Currents: The State of Economics. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1986). “In search of exploited workers: one businessman's view of comparable worth”, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 9: 95–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turbayne, C. (1970). The Myth of Metaphor. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Health and Human Services (1982). Nurse Supply, Distribution and Requirements. Hyattsville, MD.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Health and Human Services (1981). The Recurrent Shortage of Registered Nurses. Hyattsville, MD.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandelt, A. et. al. (1982). “Why Nurses Leave Nursing and What Can Be Done About It”, American Journal of Nursing 72–81.

  • Wheelwright, P. (1967). Metaphor and Reality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (1985). Heracles' Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and Poetics of the Law. Madison: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. London: Anscombe and Von Wright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, F. (1981). Taking the Quantum Leap: The New Physics for Nonscientists. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yablon, C. (1985). “The Indeterminancy of the Law: Critical Legal Studies and the Problem of Legal Explanation”, Cardozo Law Review 6: 971–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zashin, E. and P. Chapman (1974). “The Uses of Metaphor and Analogy: Toward A Renewal of Political Language”, Journal of Politics 36: 290–326.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Browne, M.N. The metaphorical constraints to pay equity: Why so many economists are outraged by comparable worth. Popul Res Policy Rev 6, 29–46 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124801

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124801

Keywords

Navigation