Skip to main content
Log in

The process of discovery

  • Machine Discovery
  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that all discoveries, if they can be viewed as autonomous learning from the environment, share a common process. This is the process of model abstraction involving four steps: act, predict, surprise, and refine, all built on top of the discoverer's innate actions, percepts, and mental constructors. The evidence for this process is based on observations on various discoveries, ranging from children playing to animal discoveries of tools, from human problem solving to scientific discovery. Details of this process can be studied with computer simulations of discovery in simulated environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anzai, Y. (1984), Cognitive control of real-time event-driven systems, Cognitive Science 8, 221–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1935), The World I See It, Translated by Alan Harris, London, J. Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, D. and Simon, H.A. (1988), Processes of scientific discovery: The strategy of experimentation, Cognitive Science 12 (2).

  • Kohler, W. (1925), The Mentality of Apes, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslowski, B. and Bruner, J. (1972), Learning to use a lever, Child Development 43, 790–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G.L., and Żytkow J.M. (1987), Scientific Discovery—Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes, The MIT Press.

  • Lenat, D. (1976), AM: an AI Approach to Discovery in Mathematics as Heuristic Search, PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, Stanford University.

  • Mendel, G. (1865), Experiments in plant-hybridization, Reprinted in: ‘Classic Papers in Genetics, Edited by Peters, J.A. Prentice-Hall.

  • Mill, J. S. (1843), A System of Logic, University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul, Reprinted in 1963.

  • Newell, A. and Simon, H.A. (1976), Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search, Communications of the ACM 19 (3), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952), The Origins of Intelligence in Children, Norton, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954), The Construction of Reality in the Child, Ballantine, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1959), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Torchbook, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, W-M. (1990), Functional transformation in ai discovery systems, Artificial Intelligence 41 (3), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, W-M. (1993), Discovery as autonomous learning from the environment, Machine Learning 12, 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, W-M. and Simon, H.A. (1993), Fitness requirements for scientific theories containing recursive theoretical terms, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44, 641–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, W-M. (1994), Autonomous Learning from the Environment, W.H. Freeman, Computer Science Press.

  • Turing, A.M. (1950), Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind 59, 433–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, WM. The process of discovery. Found Sci 1, 233–251 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124612

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124612

Key words

Navigation