Summary
The modern view is stressed that the structuring of water around nonpolar solutes, a process called hydrophobic hydration, actually favors the solubility of nonpolar solutes in water, its associated positive free energy of transfer arising from the enthalpic input required to create a cavity in water to accommodate the solute. The results of a series of molecular dynamics simulations of methane in SPC/E water at different temperatures are reported. These results show the existence of a larger fraction of broken hydrogen bonds in the hydration-shell water of the nonpolar solutes with respect to the bulk water, the difference increasing with a rise in temperature. This supports Muller's modified hydration-shell hydrogen-bond model predictions, where hydration-shell water molecules have lower free energies of hydrogen-bond breaking than those in the bulk.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
TanfordC., The Hydrophobic Effect: Formation of Micelles and Biological Membranes, Wiley, New York, NY, 1973.
FranksF. (Ed.) Water, a Comprehensive Treatise, Vol. 4, Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1975, Ch. 1.
Ben-NaimA., Hydrophobic Interactions, Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1980.
MullerN., J. Solution Chem., 17 (1988) 661.
MullerN., Acc. Chem. Res. 23 (1990) 23.
CostasM., KronbergB. and SilvestonR.J., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 90 (1994) 1513.
KronbergB., CostasM. and SilvestonR.J., Dispers. Sci. Technol., 15 (1994) 333.
NémethyG. and ScheragaH.A., J. Chem. Phys., 36 (1962) 3401.
ShinodaK. and FujihiraM., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 41 (1968) 2612.
ShinodaK., J. Phys. Chem., 81 (1977) 1300.
HvidtA., Acta Chem. Scand. A, 37 (1983) 99.
PrivalovP.L. and GillS.J., Adv. Protein Chem., 39 (1988) 191.
PrivalovP.L. and GillS.J., Pure Appl. Chem., 61 (1989) 1097.
GillS.J., DecS.F., OlofssonG. and WadsöI., J. Phys. Chem. 89 (1985) 3758.
DecS.F. and GillS.J., J. Solution Chem., 14 (1985) 417.
DecS.F. and GillS.J., J. Solution Chem., 14 (1985) 827.
GillS.J. and WadsoI., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 73 (1976) 2955.
MirejovskyD. and ArnettE.M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 105 (1983) 1112.
LazaridisT. and PaulaitisM.E., J. Phys. Chem., 96 (1992) 3847.
GeigerA., RahmanA. and StillingerF.H., J. Chem. Phys., 70 (1979) 263.
ManceraR.L. and BuckinghamA.D., J. Phys. Chem., 99 (1995) 14632.
BradlS. and LangE.W., J. Phys. Chem., 97 (1993) 10463.
BradlS., LangE.W., TurnerJ.Z. and SoperA.K., J. Phys. Chem., 98 (1994) 8161.
HaselmeierR., HolzM., MarbachW. and WeingartnerH., J. Phys. Chem., 99 (1995) 2243.
ManceraR.L. and BuckinghamA.D., Chem. Phys. Lett., 234 (1995) 296.
SkipperN.T., Chem. Phys. Lett., 207 (1993) 424.
PattersonD. and BarbeM., J. Phys. Chem., 80 (1976) 2435.
Mancera, R.L., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., (1996) in press.
K.Refson, Molecular dynamics simulation code, Moldy, Department of Earth Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, U.K., 1988, 1992, 1993.
BerendsenH.J.C., GrigeraJ.R. and StraatsmaT.P., J. Phys. Chem., 91 (1987) 6269.
JorgensenW.L., MaduraJ.D. and SwensonC.J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106 (1984) 6638.
SciortinoF., GeigerA. and StanleyH.E., Nature, 354 (1991) 218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is based on a presentation given at the 14th Molecular Graphics and Modelling Society Conference, held in Cairns, Australia, August 27 September 1, 1995.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mancera, R.L. Towards an understanding of the molecular basis of hydrophobicity. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 10, 321–326 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124501
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124501