The rationally uninformed electorate: Some experimental evidence

Abstract

This essay reports on a series of twenty-four election experiments in which voters are allowed to decide between voting retrospectively and purchasing contemporaneous information about the candidate challenging the incumbent. Each experiment consists of a series of election periods in which dummy candidates choose spatial positions which represent either their policy while in office or a promise about policy if elected. Subjects (voters) are told the value to them of the incumbent's policy, but they must decide, prior to voting, whether or not to purchase information about the value of the challenger's promise. In general, our data conform to reasonable expectations: voters purchase less information and rely more on retrospective knowledge when the candidates' strategies are stable, and their likelihood of purchasing information during periods of instability is tempered by the likelihood that their votes matter, by the reliability of the information available for purchase, and by the degree of instability as measured by changes in each voter's welfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Collier, K., McKelvey, R.D., Ordeshook, P.C., and Williams, K. (1987). Retrospective voting: An experiment study. Public Choice 53: 101–130.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McKelvey, R.D., and Ordeshook, P.C. (1985). Elections with limited information: A fulfilled expectations model using contemporaneous poll and endorsement data as information sources. Journal of Economic Theory 36: 55–85.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McKelvey, R.D., and Ordeshook, P.C. (1986). Information, electoral equilibria, and the democratic ideal. Journal of Politics 48: 910–937.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Palfrey, T.R., and Poole, K.T. (1986). The relationship between information, ideology, and voting behavior. Carnegie-Mellon University. Mimeo.

  6. Popkin, S., Gorman, J.W., Phillips, C., and Smith, J.A. (1976). What have you done for me lately?: Toward an investment theory of voting. American Political Science Review 70: 779–805.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a National Science Foundation grant to the University of Texas at Austin. We also wish to thank Peter Gray for preparing the network over which the experiments were conducted.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collier, K., Ordeshook, P.C. & Williams, K. The rationally uninformed electorate: Some experimental evidence. Public Choice 60, 3–29 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124309

Download citation

Keywords

  • Experimental Evidence
  • Public Finance
  • Spatial Position
  • Reasonable Expectation
  • Election Period