Skip to main content
Log in

On categorical notions of compact objects

  • Published:
Applied Categorical Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the nature of compactness, there are several interesting ways of defining compact objects in a category. In this paper we introduce and study an internal notion of compact objects relative to a closure operator (following the Borel-Lebesgue definition of compact spaces) and a notion of compact objects with respect to a class of morphisms (following Áhn and Wiegandt [2]). Although these concepts seem very different in essence, we show that, in convenient settings, compactness with respect to a class of morphisms can be viewed as Borel-Lebesgue compactness for a suitable closure operator. Finally, we use the results obtained to study compact objects relative to a class of morphisms in some special settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adámek, J., Herrlich, H., and Strecker, G. E.: Abstract and Concrete Categories, Wiley, New York-Chichester-Brisbane-Toronto-Singapore, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Áhn, P. N. and Wiegandt, R.: Compactness in categories and interpretations, Preprint, 1990.

  3. Castellini, G.: Compact objects, surjectivity of epimorphisms and compactifications, Cahiers Topologie Geom. Differentielle Categoriques 31 (1990), 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Čech, E.: Topological Spaces, Revised by Z. Frolík and M. Katětov, Academia, Praha, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clementino, M. M.: Separação e Compacidade em Categorias, PhD Thesis, Universidade de Coimbra, 1992.

  6. Clementino, M. M., Giuli, E., and Tholen, W.: Topology in a category: compactness, Preprint.

  7. Dikranjan, D. and Giuli, E.: Closure operators I, Topology Appl. 27 (1987), 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dikranjan, D. and Giuli, E.: Compactness, minimality and closedness with respect to a closure operator, in: Categorical Topology and Its Relations to Analysis, Algebra and Combinatorics, Proc. Int. Conf. Prague, World Scientific, Singapore-New Jersey-London-Hong Kong, 1988, pp. 284–296.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dikranjan, D., Giuli, E., and Tholen, W.: Closure operators II, in: Categorical Topology and Its Relations to Analysis, Algebra and Combinatorics, Proc. Int. Conf. Prague, World Scientific, Singapore-New Jersey-London-Hong Kong, 1988, pp. 297–335.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Freyd, P. J. and Kelly, G. M.: Categories of continuous functors, I, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 2 (1972), 169–191, Erratum ibid. 4 (1974), 121.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnstone, P. T.: Stone Spaces, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. MacLane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematician, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manes, E. G.: Compact Hausdorff objects, Topology Appl. 4 (1974), 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sousa, L.: Orthogonality and closure operators, Cahiers Topologie Geom. Differentielle Categoriques, to appear.

  15. Sousa, L.: α-sober spaces via the orthogonal closure operator, Applied Categ. Structures 4 (1996), 87–95 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Partial financial assistance by Centro de Matemática da Universidade de Coimbra and by a NATO Collaborative Grant (CRG 940847) is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clementino, M.M. On categorical notions of compact objects. Appl Categor Struct 4, 15–29 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124111

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124111

Mathematics Subject Classifications (1991)

Key words

Navigation