From genes to phenotype: dynamical systems and evolvability

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agur, Z. & Kerszberg, M., 1987. The emergence of phenotypic novelties through progressive genetic change. Am. Nat. 129: 862–875.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alberch, P., 1982. Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes, pp. 313–332 in Development and evolution, edited by J. T.Bonner. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alberch, P., 1989. The logic of monsters: Evidence for internal constraint in development and evolution. Geobios. mém. spéc. 12: 21–57.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alberch, P. & Gale, E., 1985. A developmental analysis of an evolutionary trend: Digital reduction in amphibians. Evol. 39: 8–23.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold, S. J., Alberch, P., Csanyi, V., Dawkins, R. C., Emerson, S. B., Fritzch, B., Horder, T. J., Maynard Smith, J., Starck, M. J., Vrba, E. S., Wagners, S. P. & Wake, D. B., 1989. How do complex organisms evolve? In: Complex organismal functions: Integration and evolution in vertebrates, pp. 403–433. D. B.Wake and G.Roth (eds.). J. Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buss, L. W., 1987. The evolution of individuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheverud, J. M., 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J. Theor. Biol. 110: 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dawkins, R., 1985. The evolution of evolvability. In: Proceedings First Los Alamos Conference on Artificial Life. C. Langton (ed.). Los Alamos, CA.

  9. Edelman G. M., Expression of cell adhesion molecules during embryogenesis and regulation. Expl. Cell Res. 16: 1–16.

  10. Gallin, W. J., Chuong, C. M., Finkel, L. H. & Edelman, G. M., 1986. Antibodies to L-CAM perturb inductive interactions and alter feather pattern and structure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 8235–8239.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gould, S. J., 1989. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. W. W. Norton & Co., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mayr, E. & Provine, W. B., 1980. The evolutionary synthesis: Perspectives on the unification of biology. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meinhardt, H., 1982. Models of biological pattern formation. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meinhardt, H., 1984. Models for pattern formation during development in higher organisms. In: Pattern formation. G. M.Malacinski and S. V.Bryant (eds.). MacMillan Publ. Co., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meinhardt, H., 1986. Hierarchical inductions of cell states. A model for segmentation. In: Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. Supp. 4: 357–381.

  16. Murray, J. D., 1981. Prepattern formation mechanism for animal coat patterns. J. Theoret. Biol. 88: 161–199.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McKinney, M.L. 1988. Heterochrony in evolution. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oster, G. & Alberch, P., 1982. Evolution and bifurcation of development programs. Evol. 36: 444–459.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oster, G., Shubin, N., Murray, J. D. & Alberch, P., 1988. Evolution and morphogenetic rules: The shape of the vertebrate limb in ontogeny and phylogeny. Evol. 42: 862–884.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Provine, W. B., 1971. The origins of theoretical population genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sapp, J., 1983. The struggle for authority in the field of heredity, 1900–1932: New perspectives on the rise of genetics. J. History Biol. 16: 311–342.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sober, E. & Lewontin, R. C., 1982. Artifact, cause and genic selection. Phil. Sci. 49: 157–180.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Turing, A. M., 1952. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 237: 37–72.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Waddington, W. C., 1957. The strategy of the genes. Allen and Unwin, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wimsatt, W. C., 1980. Reductionist research strategies and their biases in the units of selection controversy. In: Scientific discovery. T.Nickles (ed.). D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wolpert, L., 1990. The evolution of development. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. (In press).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alberch, P. From genes to phenotype: dynamical systems and evolvability. Genetica 84, 5–11 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123979

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dynamical System