Skip to main content
Log in

Liberty and development: A further empirical perspective

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses the Wright ratings of economic freedom to investigate the relationship between economic freedom and economic development for most countries in the world. This relationship is apparently strong and direct for such economic freedoms as freedom of property and freedom of movement but inverse for freedom of association. These findings appear to be independent of the type of economic system or civil liberties, as measured by the Gastil ratings, which have their own important effects on economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bilson, J.F.O. (1982). Civil liberty — an econometric investigation. Kyklos 35: 94–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, W. (Ed.) (1990). Rating economic freedom. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenery, H.B. and Syrquin, M. (1975). Patterns of development, 1950–1970. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1988). A statistical note on the Gastil-Wright survey of freedom. In M. Walker (Ed.), Freedom, democracy and economic welfare. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gastil, R.D. and Wright, L.M. (1988). The state of the world: Political and economic freedom. In M. Walker (Ed.), Freedom, democracy and economic welfare. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (1988). Government and economic growth: A nonlinear relationship. Public Choice 56(2): 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunst, R.F. (1984). Towards a balanced assessment of collinearity diagnostics. American Statistician 38: 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, J. and Blais, A. (1987). Government, special interest groups, and economic growth. Public Choice 54(1): 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabushka, A. (1988). Rating economic freedom. In W. Block (Ed.), Rating economic freedom. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, G.W. (1988). The institutional framework and economic development. Journal of Political Economy 96(2): 653–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spindler, Z.A. (1982). The overstated economy: Implications of public choice for the national income accounting. Public Choice 38(2): 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spindler, Z.A. (1990). Economic freedom ratings. In W. Block (Ed.), Rating economic freedom. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorhies, F. and Glahe, F. (1988). Political liberty and social development: An empirical investigation. Public Choice 58(1): 45–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L.M. (1982). A comparative survey of economic freedoms. In R. Gastil, Freedom in the world: Political rights and civil liberties — 1982. New York: Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (1988). Freedom, democracy and economic welfare. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

With the statistical assistance of Laurie D. Still. Comments on previous drafts by Iraj Aberdian, Merle Holden, Brian Kantor, John W. Kendrick, Peter Kennedy, Jack Knetsch, Chris Lingle, Denton Marks, Peter Moll, Frank Vorhies, an anonymous referee, and the participants of seminars at the University of Cape Town, the University of Natal and Simon Fraser University are gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spindler, Z.A. Liberty and development: A further empirical perspective. Public Choice 69, 197–210 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123847

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123847

Keywords

Navigation