Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reviews

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, J.R. (1978). Michael Polanyi's contributions to the cause of freedom in science. Minerva 16: 382–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M., and Tullock, G. (1962). The caluclus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, M. (1977). Die Bedeutung der Entscheidungskosten in Universitätsgremien: Eine Anwendung des Konzeptes der gesellschaftlichen Interdependenzkosten. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 133: 110–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1978). Science in a free society. London.

  • Freiden, A.N., and Staaf, R.J. (1973). An economic model of student behavior. The Journal of Human Resources 396–404.

  • Hayek, F.A. von. (1960). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lith, U. van. (1979). Die Kosten der akademischen Selbstverwaltung: Eine vergleichende Untersuchung über den Zeitaufwand und die Kosten der Gremientätigkeit an vier deutschen Universitäten. München, London, Paris, New York.

  • Lith, U. van. (Forthcoming). Der Bildungsbereich als marktheoretisches Paradigma — Verfügungsrechte, ökonomische Effizientz und Chancengleichheit. Walter-Eucken-Institut. Vorträge und Aufsätze. Heft 80. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.

  • McKenzie, R.B., and Staaf, R.J. (1974). An economy of learning: Student sovereignty and academic freedom. A Public Choice Monograph. Blacksburg, Va.: University Publications.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Hohenberg, P. (1968). A primer on the economic history of Europe. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (1976a). The persistence of English common fields. In W. Parker and E. Jones (Eds.), European peasants and their markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (1976b). The economics of enclosure. In W. Parker and E. Jones (Eds.), European peasants and their markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (1976c). English open fields as behavior toward risk. Research in economic history, 1 (1976).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas A&M University, USA

    Morgan Reynolds

  2. University of California, Davis

    Morgan Reynolds

  3. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA

    Joseph D. Reid Jr.

  4. Faculty of Economics and Statistics of the University of Constance, FRG

    Jürgen Backhaus

  5. Center for Study of Public Choice, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA

    Gordon Tullock

Authors
  1. Ulrich van Lith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Morgan Reynolds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joseph D. Reid Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Geoffrey Brennan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jürgen Backhaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gordon Tullock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Lith, U., Reynolds, M., Reid, J.D. et al. Reviews. Public Choice 36, 351–371 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123792

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123792

Search

Navigation