Skip to main content
Log in

The ‘crowding out’ effect of federal government outlay decisions: An empirical note

  • Notes
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary and conclusions

This note has addressed the empirical issue of crowding out by examining the proportion of GNP devoted to private investment in new physical capital as a function of the proportion of GNP devoted to federal government outlays. Three alternative models were estimated, all of which found evidence of (a) a definite pattern in which private investment is crowded out by government spending and (b) only partial, i.e., incomplete, crowding out. These findings are, in principle, compatible with the studies by Arestis (1979), Abrams and Schmitz (1978), and Zahn (1978).

We may infer at least two important policy implications from the above findings. First, federal government decisions which act to raise federal outlays tend to diminish private-sector investment in new physical capital. To the degree that this form of crowding out occurs, private sector unemployment is generated. This clearly acts to weaken the stimulatory direct effects of the increased federal spending. Second, to the extent that federal government spending decisions lead to diminished investment in new physical capital, the rate of capital formation is diminished. This tends to worsen long-term inflation by cutting down on the ability of aggregate productive capacity to keep pace with aggregate demand.

The two implications stated above cast potentially grave doubts upon the wisdom of federal government decisions that lead to increased federal outlays. Ideally, at the very least, each such spending decision should be scrutinized for its particular impact on investment in new physical capital. Clearly, although federal government expenditures in the aggregate lead to diminished private investment, certain specific forms of federal spending may not change private investment at all, whereas other forms of federal spending may even lead to increased investment. The latter could well be characteristic of federal outlays for new highway construction. Thus, there appears to be a pressing need to disaggregate according to federal spending type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abrams, B.A., and Schmitz, M.D. (1978). ‘The ‘crowding out’ effect of government transfers on private charitable contributions. Public Choice 33 (1): 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.L., and Jordan, J.L. (1968). Monetary and fiscal actions: A test of their relative importance in economic stabilization. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, November.

  • Arestis, P. (1979). The ‘crowding out’ of private expenditure by fiscal actions: An empirical investigation. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, No. 1.

  • Carlson, K.M., and Spencer, R.W. (1975). Crowding out and its critics. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, December.

  • Keran, M.W. (1969). Monetary and fiscal influences on economic activity — The historical evidence. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, November.

  • Keran, M.W. (1970). Monetary and fiscal influences on economic activity: The foreign experience. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, February.

  • Zahn, F. (1978). A flow of funds analysis of crowding out. Southern Economic Journal, July.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

We wish to thank Professors Gordon Tullock and Milton Kafoglis for helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cebula, R.J., Carlos, C. & Koch, J.V. The ‘crowding out’ effect of federal government outlay decisions: An empirical note. Public Choice 36, 329–336 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123789

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123789

Keywords

Navigation