Skip to main content
Log in

Cytological studies on diploid and polyploid taxa of the genus Pennisetum Rich

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The cytology of thirteen taxa and two hybrids in the genus Pennisetum indicated the distribution of the taxa among the four basic chromosome numbers 5, 7, 8 and 9. The diploid nature of P. ramosum and P. typhoides and the genomic allotetraploid status of P. purpureum was further confirmed. P. massaicum (2n=32), P. orientale (2n=36) and P. subangustum (2n=36) suggested probable autotetraploid nature and the three hexaploids (2n=54) investigated (P. polystachyon, P. longistylis and P. squamulatum) revealed allohexaploid constitution. The natural triploid, P. ruppellii (2n=27) and pentaploid P. villosum (2n=45) were found to be apomicts and they were allotriploid and allopentaploid respectively. The tetraploid-hexaploid complex of P. pedicellatum showed them to be cytotypes only. The cytogenetical behaviour of the hybrid, P. typhoides x P. purpureum with 2n=21 and the trispecies hybrid (P. typhoides x P. purpureum) x P. squamulatum with 2n=48 brought out the homology within the genomes of x=7 and x=9 and also between the genomes with x=7 and x=9. The significance of the inter- and intragenomic chromosome pairing had been brought out from the interspecific hybrids and the natural allotriploid and allopentaploid species having one genome in the haploid condition.

The morphological sections of this genus did not correspond with the cytological groups. A high degree of evolutionary specialization was evident in species of the section Gymnothrix. A complete series of polyploids and high degree of heterogeneity from the morphological point of view was brought out in species with x=9.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avdulov, N. P. (1931). Karyo-systematische Untersuchung der Familie Graminen. Trudy prike. Bot. genet. Selek. 44 (Suppl.).

  • Bashaw, E. C. & E. C. Holt (1958). Megasporogenesis, embryosac development and embryogenesis in Dallisgrass, Paspalum dilatatum. Agron. J. 50: 753–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. V. & W. H. P. Emery (1957). Apomixis in the Gramineae: Tribe Andropogoneae: Themeda triandra and Bothriochloa ischaemum. Bot. Gaz. 118: 246–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrishi, N. J. (1952). Studies on the cytogenetics of six species of Pennisetums and their comparative morphology and anatomy. Genetica 26: 280–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauhar, P. P. (1968). Inter and intragenomal chromosome pairing in an interspecific hybrid and its bearing on basic chromosome number in Pennisetum. Genetica 39: 360–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (1962). Chromosomal exchange and evolution in Dactylis. 2. The chromosomal analysis of diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid species and hybrids. Genetica 32: 272–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. & M. Borril (1962). Chromosomal status, gene exchange and evolution in Dactylis. 3. The role of interploid hybrids. Genetica 32: 296–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnaswamy, N. & V. S. Raman (1951). Cytogenetical studies of the interspecific hybrid of Pennisetum typhoides Stapf and Hubb. x P. purpureum Scum. Proc. 1st Sci. Workers' Conf., Madras, pp. 47–71.

  • Krishnaswamy, N. & V. S. Raman (1953). Studies on the interspecific hybrids of Pennisetum typhoides x P. purpureum. II. Cytogenetics of 22 chromosomed F2 plants. Cytologia 18: 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, J. R. & C. A. N. Smith (1962). Tetraploid and hexaploid chromosome races of Phalaris arundinacea. Aust. J. agric. Res. 13: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntzing, A. (1937). The effects of chromosomal variation in Dactylis. Hereditas 23: 113–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntzing, A. (1954). Cytological basis for polymorphiam in Poa. Hereditas 40: 459–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, W. M. (1947). Cytology and genetics of forage grasses. Bot. Rev. 13: 319–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, K. N. (1951). Cytogeneties of apomixis in Pennisetum. Thesis, Univ. of California.

  • Narayan, K. N. (1961). Cited by K. Subramanyam, 1961, Sumposium on plant embryology, apomixis and polyembryony. J. Sci. Indust. Res. 20: 477–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, B. D. & Amar, Singh (1964). An interspecific cross in the genus Pennisetum involving two basic chromosome numbers. Curv. Sci. 33: 256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, B. D., N. W. Hardas & A. B. Joshi (1961). Autoalloploid nature of Pennisetum squamulatum. Nature 178: 1241–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, B. D., N. W. Hardas, K. P. O. Connor & S. K. Vohra (1962). Polyploidy in Pennisetum orientale Rich. Curr. Sci. 31: 161–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, V. S., M. K. Nair & D. Krishnasami (1962). The cytology of Pennisetum ruppellii-A reinvestigation. J. Ind. bot. Soc. 41: 243–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. W. (1948). Hybridity and apomixis in the perennial grass Paspalum dilatatum. Genetics 33: 628–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, L. A. (1953). A cytological study of Bouteloa gracilis from Texas and Eastern New Mexico. Am. J. Bot., 40: 702–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sree Rangasamy, S. R. & B. W. X. Ponnaiya (1963). A trispecific hybrid in Pennisetum (P. typhoides x P. purpureum) x P. squamulatum. Madras agric. J. 50: 239–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapf, O. (1934). Flora of Tropical Africa. Reeve, Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedbins, G. L. (1956). Cytogenetics and evolution of the grass family. Am. J. Bot. 43: 890–905.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sree Rangasamy, S.R. Cytological studies on diploid and polyploid taxa of the genus Pennisetum Rich. Genetica 43, 257–273 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123633

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123633

Keywords

Navigation