Skip to main content
Log in

The population genetics of reinforcing selection

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A common outcome of disruptive selection experiments between two differentiated populations which produce disadvantageous hybrids is an increase in homogamy. Experiments reported here result in another outcome when ‘classical’ selection experiments are redesigned. In these modified experiments, frequencies of genotypes in the mating population were not artificially maintained at parity but were instead determined from progeny proportions in the previous generation. In these selection lines another outcome, apart from an increase in homogamy, was demonstrated. Under a high selection coefficient against heterozygotes, elimination of a homozygote and the corresponding fixation of the other was observed. No selection line demonstrated the maintenance of two differentiated populations concurrently with the selection process of heterozygote disadvantage. A high number of generations of selection under this population genetical process is necessary to increase differences between two populations. However, the instability of gene frequencies which results in fixation or elimination of a homozygote is shown to be extremely rapid by comparison. Classical experiments were repeated and after 21 generations of selection there was no increase in divergence. For lower selection coefficients, high levels of introgression are apparent, and hence the genetical distinctness of the two populations decreases over time. This is in addition to the problem of an unstable equilibrium under selection against heterozygotes. Both aspects are important but not previously considered in experimental evidence for speciation models for which their implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayala, F. J., 1975. Genetic differentiation during the speciation process. Evol. Biol. 8: 1–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, S. A., 1974. Changes in mating behaviour produced by selection for ethological isolation between ebony and vestigial mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 28: 631–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M., 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper & Row, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., Ayala, F. J., Stebbins, G. L. & Valentine, J. W., 1977. Evolution, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. G., Whitten, M. J., Prout, T. & Gill, R., 1972. Chromosome rearrangements for the control of insect pests. Science 176: 875–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyama, D. J., 1979. Evolutionary biology. Sinauer Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, A. A. & Lambert, D. M., 1983. Disruptive selection for homogamy in mutant strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Dros. Inf. Serv. (in press).

  • Hoenigsberg, H. F., 1964. Selection for sexual isolation in Drosophila. Dros. Inf. Serv. 39: 128–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S., 1966. Selection for and against ethological isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution 20: 634–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, K., 1950. Natural selection for reproductive isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution 4: 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levene, H., 1953. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am. Nat. 87: 331–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C., 1974. The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. C., 1955. The stability of an equilibrium and the average fitness of a population. Am. Nat. 89: 281–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, M. J., 1981. Reproductive isolation ‘a critical review’. In: Evolution and Speciation. Essays in honor of M. J. D. White., eds W. R. Atchley & D. S. Woodruff: 298–334.

  • Mather, K. E., 1973. Genetical structure of populations. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J., 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biological Symposia 6: 71–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H. E. H., 1978. More evidence against speciation by reinforcement. S. Afr. J. Sci. 74: 369–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, S., 1960. An experimental study of sexual isolation with the species Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 8: 232–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, C., 1980. ‘How many genes are involved in sexual isolation?’ Genetika 12: 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, C., Kitagawa, O., Takanashi, E. & Nouaud, D., 1980. The failure to obtain sexual isolation by artificial selection. Genetica 54: 213–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., 1977. Genes in population. John Wiley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B., 1954. Genetic divergence of isolated populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Caryologia, 6. suppl.: 761–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B., 1968. Topics in population genetics. Norton, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, M. J., 1971. Insect control by genetic manipulation of natural populations. Science 171: 682–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. & Hedrick, A., 1982. Speciation and the economics of mate choice. Evol. Theory 6: 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Publication No. 2, Evolutionary Genetics Laboratory, University of Auckland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harper, A.A., Lambert, D.M. The population genetics of reinforcing selection. Genetica 62, 15–23 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123305

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123305

Keywords

Navigation