Skip to main content
Log in

Legal images of the family in the United States: An exercise in using law as data

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary concern of the sociology of law properly has been the analysis of legal processes, professions, and institutions. Most sociologists who are not sociologists of law do not realize the usefulness of the substantive law as a source of data concerning their areas of interest. The utility of law as a source of data is illustrated with examples from recent law affecting the family. These examples are used to suggest a model of the relationship between the family as a unit, its members as individuals, and the larger society. In this model, the primary focus is on individuals but emphasis is given to the family as an important source of individual rights and expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, N. and E. Vogel (1960). “Toward a framework for functional analysis of family behavior,” in N. Bell and E. Vogel (eds.), A Modern Introduction to the Family. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., B. Berger and H. Kellner (1973). The Homeless Mind. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boli-Bennett, J. and J. Meyer (1978). “The ideology of children and the state: rules distinguishing children in national constitutions,” American Sociological Review 43: 797–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannan, P. (1968). “Law and legal institutions,” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 9. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. and H. Gintis (1976). Schooling in Capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W. (ed.) (1980). The Sociology of Law: A Social - Structural Perspective. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1971). “Modern systems and the family: a confrontation,” Social Science Information 10 (5): 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maine, H. (1861). Ancient Law. Boston: Beacon Press (1963 reprint).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy, W. (1930). “Torts among persons in domestic relation,” Harvard Law Review 43: 1033–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, W. (1971) Law of Torts (4th ed.). St. Paul, Minn.: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. (ed.) (1974). Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiger, M. and M. Levy (1977). Law and the Rise of Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribner's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M. Jr. (1964). “Family, marriage, and kinship,” in R. Faris (ed.), Handbook of Modern Sociology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thrall, C.A. Legal images of the family in the United States: An exercise in using law as data. Popul Res Policy Rev 2, 53–65 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123249

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123249

Keywords

Navigation