Abstract
Current U.S. immigration policy places a heavy emphasis on kinship ties with a U.S. citizen or resident alien in rationing immigration visas. An alternative policy is to focus on the skills of visa applicants. Immigrants with higher levels of schooling and with skills that are more readily transferable to the U.S. labor market are more productive, as measured by their earnings. A larger proportion of skilled workers in a cohort of immigrants tends to narrow the differences in earnings among skill groups in the native-born population. This reduces income inequality and reduces the use of income transfers by the low-skilled native-born population. More highly-skilled immigrants also make less use of income-contingent transfers. A point-system would be necessary to combine the multidimensional aspects of skill. The adoption of skill-based rationing with a point system in Canada led to an increase in the skill level of the immigrants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blau, F. (1982). “The Use of Transfers by Immigrants.” Urbana: University of Illinois. Mimeo.
Cafferty, P., B.R. Chiswick, A. Greeley, and T. Sullivan (in press). Beyond the Golden Door. New Brunswick: Transaction Press.
Chiswick, B.R. (1978). “A longitudinal analysis of the occupational mobility of immigrants,” in Barbara Dennis (ed.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Winter Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association. Madison, Wisconsin: I.R.R.A.
Chiswick, B.R. (1979). “The economic progress of immigrants: Some apparently universal patterns,” in William Fellner (ed.), Contemporary Economic Problems, 1979. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
Chiswick, B.R. (1981). “Guidelines for the reform of immigration policy,” in William Fellner (ed.), Essays in Contemporary Economic Problems, 1981/1982. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
Chiswick, B.R. (1982a). “The impact of immigration on the level and distribution of economic well-being,” in Barry R. Chiswick (ed.), The Gateway: U.S. Immigration Issues and Policies. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
Chiswick, B.R. (1982b). The Gateway: U.S. Immigration Issues and Policies. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
Federal Register (1980). “Labor certification process for the permanent employment of aliens in the United States: Final rule,” Part 9. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Vol. 45, No. 246, December 19, 1980: 83, 926–983, 949.
Goldfarb, R. (1982) “Occupational preferences in U.S. immigration law: An economic analysis,” in B.R. Chiswick (ed.), The Gateway: U.S. Immigration Issues and Policies. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
Morgan, L.C. and B.L. Gardner (1982). “Potential for a U.S. guest-worker program in agriculture: Lessons from the Braceros,” in B.R. Chiswick (ed.), The Gateway: U.S. Immigration Issues and Policies. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
North, D. (1971). “Alien Workers: A Study of the Labor Certification Program.” Washington, D.C.: Transcentury Corporation. Mimeo.
Parai, L. (1975). “Canada's immigration policy: 1962–74,” International Migration Review 9: 469–472.
U.S. Department of Justice (1980). 1978 Statistical Yearbook, Immigration and Naturalizatioin Service. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Justice (various years). Annual Report, Immigration and Naturalization Service. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Usher, D. (1977). “Public property and the effects of migration upon other residents of the migrants' countries of origin and destination,” Journal of Political Economy 85: 1001–1020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is a revision of my written testimony presented before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and Refugee Policy, November 1981. It was also presented at the Society of Government Economists Meeting, Washington, D.C., December 1981.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiswick, B.R. An alternative approach to immigration policy: Rationing by skill. Popul Res Policy Rev 2, 21–33 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123247
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123247