Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of the diffuse stage in the male meiotic prophase and karyotype of Scapteriscus borellii (Orthoptera: Grylloidea)

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the mole cricket Scapteriscus borellii (2n ♂=22+XO) male meiotic prophase was studied by C-banding, fluorescent banding and silver impregnation. The nucleolus grows through early stages and reaches maximum size at a mid-diplotene phase which is characterized by a typical ‘diffuse’ stage has been described in numerous species, a variability in such descriptions is observed. These differences could arise from the confusion between morphologically similar but not comparable stages. Based on the information available at present, the existence of two different types of diffuse stage is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry, E. G., 1969. The diffuse diplotene stage of meiotic prophase in Neurospora. Chromosoma 26: 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavente, R. & Wettstein, R., 1980. Ultrastructural characterization of the sex chromosomes during spermatogenesis of spiders having holocentric chromosomes and long diffuse stage. Chromosoma 77: 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanov, Y. F., 1977. Formation of cytoplasmic synaptonemallike polycomplexes at leptotene and normal synaptonemal complexes at zygotene in Ascaris suum male mciosis. Chromosoma 61: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, H. & Di Tomaso, M. V., 1980. Regiones heterocromaticas y organizadora nucleolar durante la meiosis de Zoniopoda tarsata (Orthoptera-Romaleidae). Mendeliana 4: 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, H. & Dutra, A., 1979. The Neo-X Neo-Y sex pair in Acididae, its structure and association. Chromosoma 70: 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, H., Peceli, A., Dutra, A. & Mazzella, M. C., 1984. The timing and RNA transcription of the diffuse stage of meiotic prophase in the mole cricket. Chromosoma 90: 349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, H., Saez, F. A. & Brum-Zorrilla, N., 1974. Location, structure and behaviour of C-heterochromatin during meiosis in Dichroplus silveiraguidoi (Acrididae-Orthoptera). Chromosoma 48: 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresser, M. E. & Moses, M. J., 1980. Synaptonemal complex karyotyping in spermatocytes of the Chinese hamster (Cricctulus griseus). IV. Light and electron microscopy of synapsis and nucleolar development by silver staining. Chromosoma 76: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia de la Vega, C., López-Fernández, C., Gosálves, J., & Rufas, J. S., 1982. Cytogenetic studies on Chorthippus jucundus (Fisch.) (Orthoptera). II. Heterochromatin variation and NOR localization. Cytobios 34: 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giménez-Martín, G., De La Torre, C., López-Sáez, J. F. & Esponda, P., 1977. Plant nucleolus: structure and physiology. Cytobiologie 14: 421–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofgärtner, F. J., Schmid, M., Krone, W., Zenzes, M. T. & Engel, W., 1979. Pattern of activity of nucleolus organizer during spermatogenesis in mammals as analized by silverstaining. Chromosoma 71: 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kczer, J. & Macgregor, H. C., 1971. A fresh look at meiosis and centromeric heterochromatin in the red-backed salamander Plethodon cinereus cinereus (Green). Chromosoma 33: 146–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klášterská, I., 1976. A new look on the role of the diffuse stage in problems of plant and animal meiosis. Hereditas 82: 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klášterská, I., 1978. Structure of the eukaryotic chromosomes: the differences between mammal (mouse), grasshopper (Stethophyma) and plant (Rosa) chromosomes as revealed at the diffuse stage of meiosis. Hereditas 88: 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klášterská, I. & Natarajan, A. T., 1974. The role of diffuse stage in the cytological problems of meiosis in Rosa. Hereditas 76: 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klášterská, I., Natarajan, A. T. & Ramel, C., 1977. A highly radiation-sensitive stage in the late prophase of mouse spermatocyte meiosis. Hereditas 87: 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • León, P. E., 1975. Function of lumpbrush chromosomes: a hypothesis. J. theor. Biol. 55: 481–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levan, A., Fredga, K. & Sandberg, A., 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, B. C., 1967. The course of meiosis and centriole behaviour during the ascus development of the ascomycete Gelasinospora calospora. Chromosoma 22: 210–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luciani, J. M., 1970. Les chromosomes meiotiques de l'homme. II. Le nucléole. Les chiasmas. III. La stérilite masculine. Annls Génét. 13: 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moens, P. B., 1964. A new interpretation of meiotic prophase in Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Chromosoma 15: 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel, B., Quack, B. & Benezech, M., 1978. Le bivalent sexuel des mammiferes observé par marquage argentique au stade pachytène. Annls Génét. 21: 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oud, J. L., Jong, J. M. & Rooij, D. G., 1979. A sequential analysis of meiosis in the male mouse using a restricted spermatocyte population obtained by a hydroxyurea/triaziquone treatment. Chromosoma 71: 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oud, J. L. & Reutlinger, A. H. H., 1981. The behaviour of silver positive structures during meiotic prophase of male mice. Chromosoma 81: 569–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, F., 1912. The chromosomes of Gryllotalpa borealis. Arch. Zellforsch. 9: 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, F., 1916. A study of the germ cells of Gryllotalpa borealis and Gryllotalpa vulgaris. J. Morphol. 28: 287–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogosianz, H. E., 1970. Meiosis in the Djungarian hamster. I. General pattern of malc meiosis. Chromosoma 31: 392–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rufas, J. S., Gosálvez, J., López-Fernández, C. & Cardoso, H., 1983. Complete dependence between AG NORs and C-positive heterochromatin revealed by simultaneous AG-NOR C-banding method. Cell Biol. Int. Repts. 7: 275–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, D., Loser, C., Schmidtke, J. & Engel, W., 1982. Evolutionary conservation of a common pattern of activity of nucleolus organizers during spermatogenesis in vertebrates. Chromosoma 86: 149–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzacher, H. G., Mikelsaar, A. V. & Schnedl, W., 1978. The nature of the Ag-staining of nueleolus organizer regions. Electron-and light-microseopic studies on human cells in interphase, mitosis and meiosis. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 20: 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotelo, J. R., Garcia, R. B. & Wettstein, R., 1973. Serial sectioning study of some melotic stages in Scapteriscus borellii (Grylloidea). Chromosoma 42: 307–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, G. M. & Oliver, G., 1978. Identification of the nuclsomal organizer and cytological evidences of ribosomal DNA amplification in Gryllus argentinus, Rev. Mic. élect. 5: 50–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tres, L. L., 1975. Nucleolar RNA synthesis of meiotic prophase spermatocytes in the human testis. Chromosoma 53: 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B., 1925. The cell in development and heredity, (3rd. Ed.) Macmillan Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winiwarter, H. de, 1927. Etude du cycle chromosomique chez diverses races de Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa (L.). Arch. Biol. 37: 515–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, S. L. & John, B., 1965. The organization and ultrastructure of male meiotic chromosomes in Oneopeltus fasciatus. Chromosoma 17: 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cardoso, H., Stoll, M., Dutra, A. et al. Characterization of the diffuse stage in the male meiotic prophase and karyotype of Scapteriscus borellii (Orthoptera: Grylloidea). Genetica 71, 23–29 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123229

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123229

Keywords

Navigation